NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet

By

NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet
Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief
It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember. NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet and use the grid to complete the remaining.
Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate recently and as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck to cover their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debates ever since.
As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance, or opinions on healthcare matters and depth understating of your selected as they are debated for inclusion into a new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policies and responses to changes in legislation. For these reasons, you should be prepared to speak to the nation about issues and how you might solve healthcare issues by making the news.
In this Assignment, you might position it politically based, and you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of the current or proposed policy.
To Prepare:

Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations.
Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by each of the last three U.S. presidential administrations.
Reflect on the focus of their respective agendas, including the allocation of financial resources for addressing the healthcare issue you selected.
Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or staff member for inclusion on the agenda.

The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page Fact Sheet)
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid
Use the Agenda Comparison Grid assignment template for part 1 in the Learning Resources and complete Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations and their agendas related to the public health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

Identify and briefly describe the population health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.
Describe the administrative agenda focus related to the issue you selected.
Identify the financial and other resource allocations the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.
Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis
Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template by addressing the following:

Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?
How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there?
Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents? NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet. Complete the remaining part 2.

Part 3: Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief
Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a staff member about this healthcare issue. You can use Microsoft Word or PowerPoint to create your Fact Sheet or Talking Point Brief. Be sure to address the following:

Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.
Justify the role of the nurse in agenda-setting for healthcare issues.

By Day 7 of Week 2
Submit your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment and template found in the learning.
Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You can also “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than five days to provide you with quality feedback.

Discussion: Presidential Agendas
Regardless of political affiliation, every citizen has a stake in healthcare policy decisions. Hence, it is little wonder why healthcare items become such high-profile components of presidential agendas. It is also little wonder why they become such hotly debated agenda items.
Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each president (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?
To Prepare:

Review the Resources and reflect on the importance of agenda setting.
Consider how federal agendas promote healthcare issues and how these healthcare issues become agenda priorities.

By Day 3 of Week 1
 Part 3 of your assignment Post your response to the discussion question: Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each president (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?
By Day 6 of Week 1
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their response and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example. Comparison grid template agenda comparison and selected and the presidential agendas.
Example Discussion Approach 1

Discussion – Week 1

COLLAPSE

Presidential Agendas- The use of Opioids remains a crisis in the United States; due to the improper use of drugs/medications, one can become addicted. Many addictions have caused overdoses, resulting in many deaths and increased over the years. For example, the use of heroin and painkillers has gotten much attention as well as popularity. The issue has met a bipartisan politically based on the presidential consensus among civilians and government officials. Because of this, it has gained the attention of various presidents, such as George Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, their administrations, and staff for this healthcare issue! Each administration has addressed and set up measures in different approaches to attack the issue. NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet 
 
President Bush- Regarding the opioid crisis, this administration advocated and enforced a policy to trail the heroin trade across borders on the agenda comparison grid template found. This action created a way to decrease the exposure of opioids to American civilians as it relates to limited resources for buying. To add, there were strict policies on immigrants, especially across the Mexican borders, which initiated the fight against the opioid crisis and other drugs in America.
 
President Obama- This administration funded major programs and signed the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act “ in 2016, which cost approximately 180 million dollars yearly and was disbursed throughout the states. It was the first major federal addiction legislation since the 1970s and the most comprehensive to face the opioid crisis. The Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act consists of 6 pillars to attack the opioid crisis: prevention, treatment, recovery, law enforcement, criminal justice reform, and overdose reversal. Each pillar was funded accordingly. Also, this was a vision of an outline comprehensively intended to halt the crisis.
 
President Trump- This administration demonstrated a similar approach as the Obama administration performed in the fight against the opioid crisis. However, Trump made a bigger budget and take on the magnitude and impact of the crisis, mainly drawing on opinions of the civilians across different states. Also, the Trump administration wanted to be better than the Obama administration by emphasizing improving the resolution for interventions in treating opioid addicts, although using a similar concept. Trump administration identified and established a mechanism for the number of addicts that doctors could treat to enable multiple benefits and positive impacts related to the interventions.
 
With that being said, I would do a combination of all the presidential administrations, such as controlling the borders, which will result in a decrease of resources to American civilians, and having programs in place for addicts that are suffering from opioid addiction. However, I will closely follow the census of the individual outcomes from the programs, during and afterward, to observe the benefits or to see if they are benefits because the goal is to prevent relapse and positive outcomes; longevity.
 
References
– Kennedy, P. J., Madras, B., & Bondi, P. (2017). The president’s commission on combating drug addiction and the opioid crisis. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, Nov 1.
-Vivolo-Kantor. A., Puja, S., Gladden, M. (2017). “Vital Signs: Trends in Emergency Department Visits for Suspected Opioid Overdoses— United States, July 2016-September 2017.”
-Jaffe, S. (2017). Trump administration begins to confront the opioid crisis. The Lancet, 390(10108), 2133. NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid  template agenda comparison grid and Fact Sheet 
Example Discussion Approach 2

Discussion – Week 1

COLLAPSE

Since the Supreme Court handed down its 1973 decisions in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, states have constructed a lattice work of abortion law, codifying, regulating, and limiting whether, when, and under what circumstances a woman may obtain an abortion (An Overview of Abortion Laws, 2020). That said, abortions have been a hot topic for discussion in politics and healthcare. It is also a platform for presidential elections to voice their opinions of pro-life or pro-choice. Pro-life is the right for the fetus to be born full-term, whereas pro-choice is the women’s right to determine whether to terminate the pregnancy. Most people in the US believe that abortion should be legal and take a pro-choice position (Urao, n.d.). Agenda comparison grid to document information.
President Bush- President Bush was an advocate for pro-life. When Bush became president, he appointed the U.S. Supreme Court two justices, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito (Presidential Record, n.d.). President Bush set in place a few other pro-life measures that he found to be crucial. One measure was the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, which recognizes unborn children as victims of violent federal crimes (Presidential Record, n.d.). The second measure was the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act. The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act allows babies who have survived abortions the same legal protections as babies who are born spontaneously but also prematurely, and legislation is to prevent healthcare providers from being penalized by the federal, state, or local governments for not providing abortions.
President Obama- President Obama made it clear from the start of his presidency that he was pro-choice. At the beginning of his presidency, he appointed pro-abortion advocates Elena Kagan (2010) and Sonia Sotomayor (2009) to the U.S. Supreme Court. In 2010 when Obamacare was passed, it included that the health plans would pay for elective abortions. In 2011, Obama was adamant about keeping funding available for Planned Parenthood. The Obama Administration blocked efforts by several states to cut off government funds to Planned Parenthood (Presidential Record, n.d.).
President Trump- President Trump is also an advocate for pro-life along with President Bush. Trump has selected Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh for the U.S. Supreme Court. In 2017 President Trump signed a resolution into law that overturned an eleventh-hour regulation by the Obama Administration that prohibited states from defunding certain abortion facilities in their federally funded family planning programs (Presidential Record, n.d.). Later, in 2018, Trump’s Heath and Human Services passed regulations stating that Title X funding does not go to any facility that performs abortions or refers for abortions. NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet. Use this agenda comparison grid. Brief assignment template for part.
After reviewing each president’s stance on abortions, I would have to side with President Obama. Although there may not be other topics I agree with his, I am a firm believer in a pro-choice agenda comparison grid to complete. There must be available resources for women to have a safe and nonjudgmental abortion if they decide it is in their best interest. Brief description of the population and depth understanding of your selected.
An Overview of Abortion Laws. (2020, May 8). Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws. 
Presidential Records. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.nrlc.org/federal/potus/
Urao, Ayako. (n.d.).  Pro-Life, Pro-Choice, Retrieved from http://www2.smc.edu/voices/forerunner/volume1_3/1_3politics/choice.htm.

Rubric Detail for NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

Grid View
List View

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid-
-Identify a population health concern
-Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

The response clearly and accurately identifies and describes a population health concern. NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet. The topic of healthcare.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

The response vaguely identifies and describes a population health concern.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

The response inaccurately identifies and describes a population health concern.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Identifying and describing a population health concern are missing or incomplete; identify and provide a brief.

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid-
– Describe the administrative agenda focused on this issue for the current and two previous presidents.
– Identify the financial and other resource allocations of the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.
– Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response clearly and accurately describes the presidential administration’s focus on the concern and the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern. It explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. At least three resources are used.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response vaguely describes the presidential administration’s focus on the concern and the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern. It explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Only two resources are used.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response inaccurately describes the presidential administration’s focus on the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and how each presidential administration approached the issue. Only one resource is used. NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The description of the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explanation for how each presidential administration approached the issue is missing. No resources are used to focus related to this issue.

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:
-Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?
-How might your selected healthcare issue get on the agenda? How does it stay there? NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet
-Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?

23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

-The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue.
-Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.
– The response clearly and accurately identifies the selected healthcare issue’s entrepreneur/champion/sponsor.

20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

-The response vaguely identifies an administrative agency that may be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue.
-Response adequately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.
-Identification of the selected healthcare issue’s entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor is vague.

18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

-Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is inaccurate.
-Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains vague or inaccurate.
-Identification of the selected healthcare issue’s entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.

0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

-Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing.
-Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
-Identification of the selected healthcare issue’s entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor is vague, inaccurate, or missing.

Narrative:
Based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a staff member for this healthcare issue.
-Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.
 
-Justify the role of the nurse in agenda-setting for healthcare issues

32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

Creates a well-developed, accurate narrative.
The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and 2-3 course-specific resources supporting the summary provided. Responses accurately and thoroughly justify in detail the nurse’s role in agenda-setting for healthcare issues. NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

Creates an accurate and thorough narrative.
The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response integrates at least one outside resource and 2-3 course-specific resources that may support the summary provided. Responses accurately justify the role of the nurse in agenda-setting for healthcare issues.

25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

Creates a narrative that is partially accurate or incomplete.
The response provides a vague or inaccurate summary of outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided. The responses partially justify the nurse’s role in agenda-setting for healthcare issues.

0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of no outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided. A comparison grid should be posted.
Responses justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate the continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long, rambling, short, nor lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria. Nurs 6050 agenda comparison grid

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
The assignment’s purpose, introduction, and conclusion are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
The assignment’s purpose, introduction, and conclusion are vague or off-topic.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows the correct APA format for the title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses the correct APA format with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 Name Nurs 6050 Assignment Module01 _Week02_Assignment_Rubric. NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis and Fact Sheet Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Agenda comparison grid agenda Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric Grid View nurs 6050 List View Excellent Good Fair Poor Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid- -Identify a population health concern. -Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) The response clearly and accurately identifies and describes a population health concern. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) The response vaguely identifies and describes a population health concern. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) The response inaccurately identifies and describes a population health concern. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Identification and description of a population health concern are missing or incomplete. Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid- – Describe the administrative agenda focused on this issue for the current and two previous presidents. – Identify the financial and other resource allocations of the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue. – Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The response clearly and accurately describes the presidential administration’s focus on the concern and the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern. It explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. At least three resources are used. NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The response vaguely describes the presidential administration’s focus on the concern and the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern. It explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Only two resources are used. 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response inaccurately describes the presidential administration’s focus on the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and how each presidential administration approached the issue. Only one resource is used and provides a brief description. 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The description of the presidential administrations’ focus related to the concern, financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explanation for how each presidential administration approached the issue is missing. No resources are used. Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following: -Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? -How might your selected healthcare issue get on the agenda? How does it stay there? -Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents? 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) -The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue. Completing this grid -Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. – The response clearly and accurately identifies the selected healthcare issue’s entrepreneur/champion/sponsor. 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) -The response vaguely identifies an administrative agency that may be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue. -Response adequately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. -Identification of the selected healthcare issue’s entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor is vague. 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) -Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is inaccurate. -Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains vague or inaccurate. -Identification of the selected healthcare issue’s entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue. 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) -Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing. -Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague and inaccurate or is missing. -Identification of the selected healthcare issue’s entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor is vague, inaccurate, or missing. Narrative: NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet Based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a staff member for this healthcare issue.   -Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. -Justify the role of the nurse in agenda-setting for healthcare issues 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) Creates a well-developed, accurate narrative. The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and 2-3 course-specific resources supporting the summary provided. Responses accurately and thoroughly justify in detail the nurse’s role in agenda-setting for healthcare issues. 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) Creates an accurate and thorough narrative. The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course-specific resources that may support the summary provided. Responses accurately justify the role of the nurse in agenda-setting for healthcare issues. 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) Creates a narrative that is partially accurate or incomplete. The response provides a vague or inaccurate summary of outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided. The responses partially justify the role of the nurse in agenda-setting for healthcare issues and the talking points brief assignment template. Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Assignment Template for Part 1 and Part 2 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) The response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of no outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided. Responses justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues are inaccurate and incomplete or are missing. Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate the continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long, rambling, short, nor lacking substance and understanding of your selected issue.  A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided, which delineates all required criteria. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. The assignment’s purpose, introduction, and conclusion are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. The assignment’s purpose, introduction, and conclusion are vague or off-topic. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows the correct APA format for the title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses the correct APA format with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric NURS 6050 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services