Write an essay about China’s zero-covid policy, critique the pop-source you choo

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Write an essay about China’s zero-covid policy, critique the pop-source you choose and praise it with data support.
For this assignment, you will critique an article from a popular media source (pop-source) that is reporting on a recent study in a field of your choosing. Then you will find the original scholarly article the pop-source is based upon, and explore the pop-source’s degree of fidelity to the actual research, determining exactly how it uses (or misuses) the information from the original scholarly source. This information will become part of a more thorough analysis and critique of the pop-source.
Though you will eventually produce one complete essay, we will approach the task in three parts.
Part I: Locate an article from a popular media source that reports on a on a recent study in a field of your choosing. These stories are everywhere—on Salon, Vox, Buzzfeed, Mashable, etc. The article should be for a general audience, and must be no more than one year old. We will look at examples in class.
Part II. Use your research skills in any academic library databases to find the scholarly source study for your pop-source. In other words, where did Mashable or Vox find the study they are writing about? Once you’ve found it, you’ll need to read and understand it. This is hard, but it’s great practice!
Part III. In essay form, write your critique of the pop-source (not the scholarly article), including the following three components:
An analysis of the research. Does the pop-source get the information right, wrong, or something in between? What important elements are omitted? What is distorted? Obscured? Exaggerated? Be precise. Is the pop-source audience getting misled, intentionally or not, and if so, what might be the consequences?
An evaluation of the key writing approach and techniques used by the author of the pop-source. For example, how does the writer attempt to establish credibility and build authority? What is the writer’s tone? Identify and evaluate one or two such telltale moves, and consider the effects these techniques might have on the audience. Remember: don’t just describe these techniques—evaluate them.
Explore the why behind these moves. Why does the pop-source author make the moves she makes? As you pursue this line of reasoning, move beyond the obvious (i.e., that one article was written for a scholarly journal, and one for a popular audience), and consider not only the differing purposes of the articles, but what is lost or gained. Show insight and powerful critical thinking here. This is an opportunity to do some thinking about the wide gap that exists between scholarly source material and the sorts of things everyone else reads.
To make your own writing successful, show the evidence and reasoning that support your claims. That means quoting to illustrate your specific analytical points (evidence), and explaining why those passages deserve your evaluation (reasoning).
You need not follow the order of the bullet points above, and you can intermix these components if you wish. Although your writing and thinking will involve continually comparing these sources, your critique is more than a compare-and-contrast essay.
Finally, write several drafts of the paper, and remember what Mark Twain told us. When you get to your later drafts, put the paper in MLA style, using the correct formatting, in-text citations, and references page. And then, late in the drafting stage, apply our golden rule: If you can cut it, cut it. Since you’re now experts at writing concisely and precisely, I’ll expect that you can fit 4-5 pages of insight and information into a finished essay of 2-3 pages. Good luck!
PreviousNext

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services