Write 2-3 paragraphs for each article 5 articles in Communication in veterans / Agenda setting theory must be peer-reviewed

Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

2-3 paragraphs for each article
5 articles in Communication in veterans / Agenda setting theory must be peer-reviewed
An annotated bibliography will be due before your final paper. Annotations are short explanations of the source used. Annotated bibs must contain at least five peer reviewed sources (meaning they come from a refereed, scholarly journal). You may need more than five sources. Annotated bibs must be written in APA 6th edition format, and will not receive credit if written in other formats. Grading will consider format, APA style, and quality of annotations.
Written assignments will filtered with TURNITIN software which scans for plagiarism and duplication the following deductions will be applied to your grade based on the TURNITIN scans : 10% off if the duplication rate is 36%-40%, 15% off if the duplication rate is 41%-50%, and 20% if the duplication rate is 51% and higher.
Rubric
Annotated Bibliography Rubric
Annotated Bibliography Rubric
Criteria    Ratings    Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStructure and formatting
Accurate spacing and indentation; proper citation structure; at least five peer-reviewed articles used.
3 pts
Distinguished: Included at least five peer-reviewed articles; proper spacing and indentation
2.25 pts
Satisfactory: Included at least five peer-reviewed articles; minor errors in spacing and indentation
1.5 pts
Below Average: Included a majority of the five required peer-reviewed sources; significant errors in spacing and indentation
0.75 pts
Unsatisfactory: Included only a couple peer-reviewed sources; extreme errors in spacing and indentation
0 pts
Not included: No peer-reviewed sources included
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
Proper use of APA style; accurate order of citations; appropriate fonts
3 pts
Distinguished: Used correct APA style in citations; page limit was met; proper font and point size used
2.25 pts
Satisfactory: Use APA style in citations; page limit was met; minor errors in font and/or APA style
1.5 pts
Below average: Did not use APA or had major errors and/or did not meet the page limit; used the proper font and point size required
0.75 pts
Unsatisfactory: Did not use APA style in citations; failed to meet page length; did not use font and point size required
0 pts
Not included: No attempt made
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and spelling
3 pts
Distinguished: Had no spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors
2.25 pts
Satisfactory: Had minor spelling, grammatical or punctuation errors
1.5 pts
Below average: Had major spelling, grammatical or punctuation errors
0.75 pts
Unsatisfactory: Had more than 15 spelling, grammatical or punctuation errors
0 pts
Not included: No attempt made
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of article
Coherent summary of cited articles: What are the main points of the articles? What topics are covered?
8 pts
Distinguished: Coherent and comprehensive summary of articles
6 pts
Satisfactory: Mostly coherent and adequately comprehensive summary of articles
4 pts
Below average: Often incoherent and/or sparse summary of articles
2 pts
Unsatisfactory: Mostly incoherent and/or inadequate summary of articles
0 pts
Not included: No attempt made
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation of article
Substantive commentary on the strengths and weaknesses of the article and how it fits into the student’s research
8 pts
Distinguished: Substantive commentary on the strengths and weaknesses of the articles and how they fit into the student’s research
6 pts
Satisfactory: Adequate commentary on strengths and weaknesses of the articles and how they fit into the student’s research; a few holes
4 pts
Below average: Significant gaps in evaluation of articles; often sparse or incoherent commentary; somewhat inadequate evaluation of how the articles fit the student’s research
2 pts
Unsatisfactory: Mostly sparse or incoherent commentary on articles; inadequate evaluation of how the articles fit the student’s research
0 pts
Not included: No attempt made
8 pts

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services