Which Better Portrays The Condition Of Non-Resident Indians, Bend It Like Beckham Or The Namesake?

Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

I need support with this History question so I can learn better.

A: Which better portrays the condition of Non-Resident Indians, Bend it Like Beckham or The Namesake? explain in 2-3 paragraphs.

B: do you agree or disagree with the following statement. explain why in couple sentences.”While BILB does exhibit the friction and somewhat uneasy intercultural discourse between Indian and white Brits, especially with Jess’ parents’ unwillingness to let her pursue a career in football (soccer), it seems to me to be less successful in portraying the condition of Non-Resident Indians than The Namesake.

The reason for which I make this argument is that the latter presents a veritable identity crisis, in which Gogol genuinely struggles to figure out how truly Indian he is, in every sense. While Gogol goes from a highly-Americanized youth to a more culturally and heritage-aware adult, Jess appears to have very little, if any interest in living the life of a typical Indian woman, something which only worsens throughout the narrative.

Though I myself am not Indian, I am the son of a French father and Scottish Mother, who has never lived longer than two years in either of my ancestral countries. When you grow up or even move to a land which is not your own, you are bound to be pulled this way and the other, and to be confused about which nation and cultural heritage to which you really belong. For me, The Namesake captures this much more than BILB.”

C:do you agree or disagree with the following statement. explain why in couple sentences “The Bend it like Beckham focuses on the main character’s desire to play football (soccer) and the conflict she faces due to her obligations to her traditional Sikh family. The character, Jess, must make the decision to pursue football or follow her parent’s wishes and complete school and marry and Indian man. Her parents have a hard time understanding Jess’ interpersonal conflict with them because they have chosen to remain separated from the British community, rather than integrate. Jess’ parents are afraid the living in Britain will influence the lives and behaviors of their daughters. They believe that their culture is the correct one and make comments about how one of their daughters marrying a white man or a Muslim would be shameful.

On the other hand, in Namesake, Gogol struggles with a sense of belonging to his family and his Bengali culture and heritage throughout his life in the course of the novel. Born and raised in the U.S., while his parents spent their entire life in India following Bengali culture and practices and moved on to America as young adults. Gogol must try to find a sense of belonging as he deals with trying to belong in American society, while following his Bengali traditions. He is bewildered as to why his father named him Gogol as it not Bengali nor a normal American name which leads him to struggle to understand himself and his identity. In Bengali families, “individual names are sacred, inviolable. They are not meant to be inherited or shared” (28). However, Gogol grows up living in America, where children are often ashamed of their differences from others. As a teenager, Gogol desires to blend in and to live unnoticed. This presents a struggle between two cultures. “Compensation & bonuses for managers: my nursing assignment help
Need help with my Accounting question – I’m studying for my class.

The readings for this module focused on different ways of measuring segment performance. In addition to being a good management practice, segment performance is also evaluated to often determine the compensation or bonuses for managers. Do you think compensation for senior segment managers should be tied to the segment performance using Return on Investment (ROI)? Why or why not? Which method of evaluation do you think would be best and why?

1- APA style.

2- 4-5 paragraphs

3- (2-3) references and don’t forget to reference inside the text.Assignment 2: Courts, Prosecution, and the Defense
I’m trying to study for my Law course and I need some help to understand this question.

The courts have one of the most important roles in the criminal justice system. They are responsible for the interpretation and application of law when crimes are committed, They exert some of their greatest influence when it involves due process under the law. The due process model argues that the greatest concern of the justice system should be providing fair and equitable treatment to those accused of crime. This perspective is demonstrated through the courts’ involvement with the police in controlling search and seizure and interrogation, protecting the rights of the accused, in cases like Miranda v. Arizona and Weeks v. United States. Have concerns over due process and protecting the “allegedly” innocent led to the guilty also being spared, as the crime control model would argue?

Criminologist Herbert Packer’s assembly line concept finds that although there are many people who commit crime and are arrested and charged, only about 21 adults are incarcerated for every 1000 serious crimes committed. Additionally, 80 percent of all felony cases and over 90 percent of misdemeanors are settled without trial.

On the other hand, over time, the Supreme Court has been diminishing the scope of the exclusionary rule. This normally excludes improperly obtained evidence by permitting more exceptions, thus allowing more “improperly obtained evidence” into court. For example, evidence is now admissible in court if the police officers acted in good faith by first obtaining court approval for their search, even if the warrant they received was deficient or faulty. This has come to be known as the good faith exception.

Based on your understanding from the readings in chapters 6-8, and keeping in mind the due process and crime control models, write a 2- to 3-page paper in which you discuss:

1. Have criminals been given too many rights by the courts?

2. Should courts be more concerned with the rights of victims or the rights of the offenders?

3. Should illegally seized evidence be excluded from trial, even though it is conclusive proof of a person’s criminal acts?

Use your textbook and at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Explain the development of American courts and illustrate the concept of the dual-court system.

• Distinguish between the various courtroom participants and describe the stages in a criminal

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using this rubric.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services