Video Clip Response 2

Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

I’m trying to learn for my Sociology class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Instructions

Choose one of the below films only!

Gender Identity: Meant to Be Maddie

https://mediaplayer.pearsoncmg.com/assets/_video.true/sociology_2017_blue_chalk_videos-Meant_to_Be_Maddie
Although Maddie’s parents knew early on that something was different about her, her father did not fully accept that Maddie was transgender until her counselor confirmed it unequivocally. Why do you think a family might be hesitant to accept that their child is transgender? Maddie’s father said that one of the biggest difficulties he faced was the mourning process—that is, mourning the loss of a son—which initially caused a rift between him and Maddie. How do you think parents are affected by having transgender children? What difficulties might they face in responding to their child’s transition? Maddie’s parents are fully supportive of her transition, but this is not the case for all transgender people. Young transgender people are 41% more at risk to commit suicide than their peers. How might parental support such as that Maddie receives help mitigate this risk? How can communities support young transgender people?
Watch the film clip prompt above. Answer the 3 questions in 300 words or more. Post your answers to this dropbox in Word. Be sure to include your word count.

OR

Transgender Bathrooms: The Debate in Washington State

https://mediaplayer.pearsoncmg.com/assets/_video.true/sociology_2017_blue_chalk_videos-The_Debate_in_Washington_State
The video focuses on two groups on opposite sides of a debate over a ballot initiative to overturn Washington state’s nondiscrimination laws protecting the rights of transgender people. Ballot initiatives often play an important role in American democracy, but should the rights of vulnerable groups such as transgender people be determined by popular vote? Why or why not? Just Want Privacy supporters argue that the nondiscrimination laws that protect the right of transgender people in Washington state to use restrooms and locker facilities that match their gender identity allow any man to use a women’s restroom simply by claiming to be a woman. Is this a valid argument? Why or why not? Just Want Privacy supporters argue that they just want to overturn the nondiscrimination laws to protect their privacy, while the Washington Won’t Discriminate supporters argue that the nondiscrimination laws are essential for protecting their equality. Who has the stronger argument? Do you think the law should protect privacy over equality or equality over privacy? Why? In America, restroom and locker facilities are traditionally segregated by gender. Do you think this is an effective system? Consider not only the issues related to transgender rights, but also the practical and logistical problems this system often causes, such as much longer lines in women’s restrooms at large events. Can you think of a more effective system that would protect the rights of everyone to privacy and equality?Video Clip Response 3
Need help with my Sociology question – I’m studying for my class.

Instructions

Watch the film clip below and answer the questions in 300 words or more. Be sure to include your word count. Post in Word to this dropbox.

Is America a Christian Nation and Why Does It Matter?

https://mediaplayer.pearsoncmg.com/assets/_video.true/sociology-2017-blue_chalk_videos-christian_america

Tell students to remember examples provided to use during the class discussion.
The Pledge of Allegiance and U.S. money contain references to God—when was “God” added? Why? There are two reasons the founders of the United States wanted to separate religion and government. What are the reasons? Legally, the United States is not a Christian nation, but demographically and culturally it is. Discuss what this means. The United States is also a nation of religious and cultural diversity. How will the increasing diversity impact the use of Christianity as the culturally dominant religion? (For example, will more holidays become “official” in the United States?)now the professor added a discussion for this week, where we have to answer 2 classmates, I will post the question: nursing assignment help services
I’m studying and need help with a Psychology question to help me learn.

Week 1 Discussion

Who Am I?

This is our first discussion and it ends 11:59pm Sunday night, February 16th. In order to avoid having 20 points deducted from your discussion grade, please make sure that you submit your first post by 11:59pm Thursday night.

Please read pages 104-106 for Kohlberg and Gilligan, then pages 98-101 for Erikson’s psychosocial tasks at different stages of life, and finally pages 465-466 for readings on suicide.

Most of us have asked ourselves the question “Who am I?” at one point or another in our lives. Coon, Mitterer, and Martini (2019) discuss the difficulties teenagers face in establishing their own identity: “Many problems stem from the unclear standards about the role adolescents should play within society” (p. 110). Our text also explains that teenagers experience ambiguity, or unclear interpretations when defining their roles. This adds to their confusion of a clear and solid sense of self.

More and more often we are seeing cases presented in the media about teens who have taken their own lives as a result of bullying and cyber-bullying (Wang, 2016). Coon, Mitterer, and Martini (2019) have argued that adolescence is a tumultuous time. However, Karen Horney’s theory explains that basic anxiety occurs because we live in a hostile world. An example is Wang’s report of a suicide by a 13-year-old girl in response to racial and social prejudice against perceived sexual orientation.

How much does emotional turbulence versus social hostility count as an explanation for teen suicide? Or is it a combination of the two?

Drawing upon Kohlberg’s theory of stages of moral development, Gilligan’s theory of caring, and Erikson’s psychosocial stages theory, discuss reasons why an adolescent might turn to suicide. Then, using one of these theories, suggest how to help a teen who has been a victim of bullying.

References
Coon, D., Mitterer, J.O., & Martini, T. (2019). Introduction to psychology: Gateways to mind and behavior (15th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. Wang, Y. (2016). After years of alleged bullying, an Ohio teen killed herself. Is her school district responsible? The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com
IMPORTANT:

1.) 3 posts per discussion2.) First post must be at least 200 words3.) Second post must be at least 150 words4.) Third post must be at least 150 words5.) First post must be submitted by 11:59pm Thursday

6.) First post must contain at least one sourceChapter 11 Content Discussion – What are some variations in self-esteem, and how are they linked to children’s development?: nursing essay help
I need an explanation for this Psychology question to help me study.

CHAPTER 11: Content Discussion

Step 1: Answer the following questions in paragraph format, using at least 300 words in each.

What are some variations in self-esteem, and how are they linked to children’s development?

What role do parent-child relationships play in self-esteem?

Step 2: Post your response on the discussion forum by using the HTML Editor to either compose or paste your response. **(do not submit/ attach a word document) Please avoid “text messaging” language in your response.For your discussion board assignment this week, you are required to respond to one of the readings and evidence your argument with ONE other scholarly source. You simply must explain how or why traditional interpretations of minorities has affected curre
I’m studying for my Humanities class and need an explanation.

This week we are examining and analyzing readings by Sandra Cisneros and a critical chapter by Walter Benn Michaels. “A Rice Sandwich,” “Hips,” “No Speak English,” “Boys and Girls,” “My Name,” and “Born Bad” are included in House on Mango Street, and “Aboriginal America” appears in Our America by Benn Michaels. Read the required chapters or narratives, not the entire books.

The above readings are grouped for two specific reasons: The works do any excellent job of addressing the individual Chicana from the double minority status, and in many cases, they present a more realistic view of women of color and their communal lives and concerns via art, rather than mainstream versions of history.

In “A Rice Sandwich,” Cisneros sets up the narrative by focusing on both class and race. For example, she depicts her classmates with “working” parents as able to eat in the canteen, a prized social action and interaction. However, we must question the notion of work and what it actually entails: Is it activity one is paid for, or is it time, energy, and effort? Second, she is careful to convey that her brothers’ heroes are not their own; they are an idealized product of Western civilization: Spartans. How does the subsequent outcome reflect both types of disconnection from the reality of her situation?

In “Hips,” Cisneros addresses the coming of age of her protagonist, but more than that fact, she specifically tackles gender and how it is categorized or fetishized by distinct traits that offer both power and new avenues of oppression. Think about the cadence and aesthetics of the piece. From both a visual and imagined audible perspective, Cisnero “sings” her audience into pacification, but why? On one hand, she is direct about hips and their relation to childbirth and rearing, but on a broader level, those ideas linked to sexuality and, in turn, the “use” of women within both Cisnero’s culture and larger society. Thus, what is a women’s power and is relegated to procreation or at least the potential for it or activity?

In “No Speak English,” Cisnero’s broaches the subject of linguistics within the context of translation and social judgments. Now, I use the term translation to address how the phrase “no speak English” is used in two ways: first, it is a coping mechanism for the character that is utilized to avoid contact with the outside world, but second, it is also a request: She literally does not want her son to speak English because it is outside the realm of what she believes is her “home” tongue. Therefore, the texts begs specific questions about diasporic communities and peoples who must re-conceptualize their ideas about home within the scope of new places and spaces (including language) that are unfamiliar to them. Cisnero is then not advocating either regression into older views of culture or society or assimilation; she is pointing out the problems with the reality of the situation: one can never go backward, and forward presents them with a new set of cultural and social constraints.

“Boy and Girls” sets-up a clear dichotomy between world of boys and girls, but what is most significant is Cisnero’s focus on her narrator role with the family dynamic. Her brothers are not responsible for anyone, yet she is tasked with the care and proper upbringing of her younger female sibling. Thus, she is a mother (or in the role of mother) simply because of her social consignment as a female.

“My Name” links the message of “Boys and Girls” and “Born Bad” together by emphasizing how gender discrimination (even within the context of one’s own race) is oppressive. Cisneros not only noted that women are subject in other minority groups, but that she literally does not want to be “born” to “inherit” her grandmother’s “place at the window”: destine to look out at the world but never to participate in it as an equal to men or the majority. In long line of Women’s writing, the notion of affliction is associated with their position in the world. For example, Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Kate Chopin speak of the struggle against women’s oppression as wrongly classified as mental illness, and Silvia Path argues that the desire for social equality for women is tantamount to being in the throws of a hallucinogenic fever. (“The Yellow Wall Paper,” “The Story of an Hour,” The Awakening, and “Fever 103”.)_

“Born Bad” is poignant in a different type of fashion, but nevertheless, poverty and gender issues play into its larger interpretation. On a personal level, Cisnero’s (the child) and family must deal with her aunt’s disease, but they do so by normalizing its debilitating elements. Viewed from a cultural perspective, the text implies that most minorities are receptive to their placement and oppression in society in much the same fashion. How many times have you heard someone say, “that is just the way it is, or we cannot change the world.” First, according to Nietzsche, the end of the world as we know it is dependent on our own acceptance of subject and apathy towards the ability to change life for ourselves and people around us. His treatise in this regard is literally titled The Antichrist, and his overall claim revolts around the fact that modern Judeo-Christian beliefs promote a New Testament version of religion that hinges on the idea of an unproved afterlife as a reward for suffering and struggling in this life. As a counter to such believes, Nietzsche champions the advantages of Old Testament self-reliance and conqueror. Now, both are specifically Western ideas, but the latter can be applied to contemporary minority struggle in both theme and historical context. First, the narrator and her aunt are trapped in traditional gender roles: they do dishes, and the husband simply wants his wife back, not a person, and all the narrator desires is the freedom and strength to not be born “bad.” Second, African American traditionally embraced Christianity because of the “God created man in his own image” clause that implies equality. However, the New Testament was used by both the dominant and minority to excuse worldly suffering—i.e. one should not complain about their plight on earth because it is temporary. For example, Stowe’s Uncle Tom fails to act against his master because of his piety. Cassie, on the other hand, fights against Simon Legree in variety of ways, becoming a hero of sorts to both African Americans and women of the time period.

In “Aboriginal America,” Benn Michael’s addresses the same general time period as Whippman’s article and argues that the rise of minorities in the United States (especially due to immigration and attempts at post-Civil War integration) threatens Anglo-Saxon dominance in three different ways: biologically through breeding, economically through replacement, and psychologically via disruption of social and cultural norms. Yet, the views on how each Anglo-Saxon gender is endangered are on opposite sides of the spectrum. Minority men are view as animalistic, who take by force, but minority women are seen as seductresses, who provoke animal like sexual reactions white men. Furthermore, the only vestige of purity left for white women who can only choose from impotent white men (Jake Barnes—war injury still makes him a hero) and minority men is becoming a lesbian—another minority, ironically, that can be cataloged, oppressed, and controlled by white men because they no longer fit within the scope of social standards. Thus, what we see from the fields of literature, art, science, etc. are depictions of minorities as both less than human and not as any clear sub-group with their own external or internal self-identification: they are the all-encompassing “foreigner” in their land—the aboriginal African, the Plumed Serpent Mexican/Indian, the savage Native, the fallen woman, and the Jew who rejected Christ.

These people are then, in fact, erased from society and culture by discourse and rhetoric that disseminated the notion that American was a type of blank space (Conrad’s Heart of Darkness and Achebe’s Things Fall Apart) before the arrival and thoughts of Franklin, Jefferson, Adams, Jackson, etc. As Benn Michael’s makes so exceedingly clear in his example of Eliot’s “Tradition and the Individual Talent,” the “whole” of literature consigned to British and American compositions. Eliot does, in his criticism and faction, advocate the study of other art, but they too are linked directly to “classically” western interpretations of the world (Greek, Roman, etc.) and, as Benn Michael later notes, aligned directly to modern “Civilization.”

This notion is then transferred to the entirety of America and defines all peoples within it as “American,” while simultaneously discounting and discriminating against those who do not share Anglo-Saxon characteristics by deeming them “Un-American” in their own country. Thus, a paradox is created where peoples from the Americas are viewed as foreign, and those who colonized the continents are accepted Native and their philosophy and practices regarded as Nativism or Nationalism. When Benn Michaels cites Cather’s statement that “The Mexican where always Mexicans, the Indians were always Indians,” he is emphasizing how colonizers use such labels to exclude and diminish minority indigenous rights and contributions to the collective United States. They are simply an afterthought, with no culture, customs, beliefs of their own; they are there to be exploited and used, dead or objectified in the same sense that Silko describes the conqueror’s version of land and animals. Economic terminology and ideology then replace any commitment to specific sections of humanity based on the idea that the “good of nation” is more important than right or wrong or ethics and morals for the majority, making both minorities and the dominant inhuman.

https://blackboard.odessa.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-34161…

https://blackboard.odessa.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-34161…

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services