Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
Help me study for my Sociology class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.
Before posting to the FORUMS:
Make sure to read the Discussion Posting Information page Make sure to read all assigned readings for the week
After posting to the FORUMS:
After participating in the discussion forums, you must choose your two best postings** and copy and paste them to this assignment link. DO NOT COPY AND PASTE A LINK TO THE DISCUSSION FORUM. Take the time to actually copy and paste your postings to this submission link. Thank you!
Please note:** two post must be your response to a topic and two posting must be your response to a classmate. YOU MUST SUBMIT YOUR TWO POSTS THROUGH THIS LINK BY THE DUE DATE IN ORDER TO GET CREDIT FOR THEM!!! Simply posting to the forums will not earn you credit for this assignment. Please do not disregard this step. I will not give students credit for anything not submitted through discussion assignment links.
Reminders:
It is YOUR responsibility to choose your two best posts each week and submit them through the weekly assignment links. If you do not do this, you will not receive credit for your discussion posting so make sure that you do not miss this crucial step.
To respond to a discussion topic, you must first submit your response to the discussion topic. Then you will be able to read other student’s postings.
Make sure to read the Discussion Posting Information located in the Course Toolkit course module.Week 3 Discussion: Living in Our State of Nature
I’m stuck on a English question and need an explanation.
Week 3 Discussion: Living in Our State of Nature
Required ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 6, 10, 12 (section: “The Modern Period”)
Ruggiero, V. R. (2012). Thinking critically about ethical issues (8th ed.). New York: Mc-Graw Hill. type in book title, then google books, once you click the link, go the search bar and search the chapters as needed. make sure to use book in paper AND 2 scholarly sources.
Lesson Minimum of 1 scholarly source
IntroductionSocial contract theorists say that morality consists of a set of rules governing how people should treat one another that rational beings will agree to accept for their mutual benefit, on the condition that others agree to follow these rules as well.
Hobbes runs the logic like this in the form of a logical syllogism:
We are all self-interested. Each of us needs to have a peaceful and cooperative social order to pursue our interests. We need moral rules in order to establish and maintain a cooperative social order. Therefore, self-interest motivates us to establish moral rules.
Hobbes looked to the past to observe a primitive “State of Nature” in which there is no such thing as morality, and that this self-interested human nature was “nasty, brutish, and short” – a kind of perpetual state of warfare.
Locke disagreed, and set forth the view that the state exists to preserve the natural rights of its citizens. When governments fail in that task, citizens have the right – and sometimes the duty – to withdraw their support and even to rebel. Locke addressed Hobbes’s claim that the state of nature was the state of war, though he attribute this claim to “some men” not to Hobbes. He refuted it by pointing to existing and real historical examples of people in a state of nature. For this purpose he regarded any people who are not subject to a common judge to resolve disputes, people who may legitimately take action themselves to punish wrong doers, as in a state of nature.
Initial Post InstructionsFor the initial post, address the following:
Which philosophy do you espouse? How much authority should be granted to governments (e.g., the right to kill (death penalty/capital punishment/use of deadly force)? How much would you give up in return for safety? If you side with Hobbes, do you support at any point recourse if the government violates its own contract (if so, you probably have a bit of Locke in your thinking)?
Writing Requirements
Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source) APA format for in-text citations and list of references
GradingThis activity will be graded using the Discussion Grading Rubric. Please review the following link:
Link (webpage): Discussion Guidelines
Weekly Objectives (WO)WO2.3-2.5, 4.Final Project: Part 3: Interview Write-up: my nursing assignment help
I’m trying to study for my Psychology course and I need some help to understand this question.
When you conducted your interview for Part 2 of the Final Project, you completed a critical portion of your project. This interview will provide you with significant information and insight concerning the counseling group and setting that interests you.
With this foundation, you can now analyze what was discussed during the interview more thoroughly, and consider how it might impact your disposition and methods moving forward. You can also reflect on your original vision of your professional life and consider whether anything from the interview may affect that.
For Part 3 of your Final Project, you will submit the write-up of your interview with the mental health counselor you selected. For your interview and final write-up, you will demonstrate both breadth and depth of knowledge and critical thinking appropriate to graduate-level scholarship. Refer back to any pertinent Learning Resources throughout this course that might support your write-up. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate your mastery of the concepts presented throughout this course. APA style citations throughout your paper are required.
To Prepare:
Review your notes and the audiotape of your interview with the mental health counselor. In the Week 1 Spark Discussion, you described your vision for your future professional life as a counselor. Return to this Spark Discussion and consider what you wrote. Please review the Bureau of Labor Statistics report in this week’s Learning Resources. Relevant labor market information starts on page 12 of the report. For Part 3 of your Final Project, you must follow APA Publication Manual guidelines; eliminate typographical, spelling, and grammatical errors; and adhere to Walden’s Academic Integrity guidelines. (Information on scholarly writing may be found in the APA Publication Manual and at the Walden Writing Center website. Also, see “Policies on Academic Honesty” under Walden University Policies and Information in the Guidelines and Policies area.) Please review the Final Project Rubric located in the Course Information section of the course. Use the Final Project Template found in this week’s Learning Resources to help create your write-up for this Final Project Part 3.
Final Project Part 3
Your write-up should be 5 to 7 pages in length (double-spaced), not including the title page and references. It should include the following:
A detailed write-up of the interview, with links back to the Learning Resources. Note: Your write-up should be presented as a narrative rather than a listing of questions and answers. In your write-up include how this information relates to the material in the course. (Cite the Learning Resources from the course consistently throughout your paper using APA style citations.) Provide a reflection on the following questions:
Consider your response to the Week 1 Spark Discussion question. How has your vision changed over the past 10 weeks? What is the same? What new insights have you gained? What did you learn from the interview that you did not learn in the course? What, if anything, did you learn from the interview that contrasted with what you learned in the course? What do you anticipate the impact of being a clinical mental health counselor may be on who you are personally?
References:Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). Occupational employment and wages- May 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ocwage.pdfCritical Commentaries: nursing case study help
I need support with this Political Science question so I can learn better.
For this course, students are required to write three critical commentaries. Commentary #1 is due online by 9 am on January 30th. This commentary should explore topics in the readings assigned through January 30th.
The aim of each paper is comparative inquiry and analysis, not mere description. The emphasis is on reasoning and critical thinking. It is not enough simply to recapitulate what each reading has to say about a given theme. You must compare and contrast what they have to say about a topic of your own choosing. To do this, you must evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the types of analysis and theories presented, and offer some conclusion of your own. Thus, each paper should include the following:
A clear, persuasive introduction with an explicit thesis statement and a roadmap to tell me where and what you will try to demonstrate in the paper. A very brief summary or literature review of the selected readings for the paper, with an emphasis on key arguments, type of analysis and conclusions found in each work. Avoid summarizing details. Stick to the main points. A brief summary of the theme to be discussed in your paper. What are the issues involved and why are they important? What do we learn from each paper? A comparative inquiry and analysis of what the readings have to say about the theme. What do we learn from these discussions? How does the chosen analysis advance or weaken the key arguments? Which cultural or political perspectives are at play? What remains to be learned?
Important Notes:
Papers are due online on before the start of class (9:00 am). Late papers will be accepted by email for up to 48 hours, but will receive a deduction for tardiness. Each of the three papers should be 5 pages double-spaced with normal 1” margins and 12 pt., Times New Roman font. All papers must be in APA style and include in-text citations and a full bibliography. In grading your commentaries, I will evaluate the ideas you present, how you link your ideas to course materials and how well the paper is organized and executed. A rubric is available on Canvas for further information.Peer and Family Influence on Self-esteem
I don’t understand this Psychology question and need help to study.
Imagine you have been asked to speak to a group of parents about promoting self-esteem in school-age children. You need to research the topic and prepare a visually appealing PowerPoint slideshow to accompany your presentation. Your PowerPoint slideshow will need to:
Have a title slide. Contain 5-10 content slides that include Speaker Notes which provide supporting details to use when elaborating on the slide contents. Address the following questions:
How does level of self-esteem typically change during middle childhood? What factors contribute to this change? What are some influences on school-age children’s self-esteem? Does very high self-esteem always have positive effects on children’s adjustment? Why or why not? What are the typical consequences of low self-esteem? What are some other strategies that parents and teachers can use to promote children’s self-esteem? What behaviors should adults avoid, and why?
Be written using proper spelling/grammar. Cite at least 3 academic references and present the sources in APA format on a References slide