These are the two readings for the discussion post. https://www.theatlantic.com/

Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

These are the two readings for the discussion post.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/11/if-youre-not-paranoid-youre-crazy/407833/
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/going-online-in-the-age-of-conspiracy-theories/411544/
After reading Going Online in the Age of Conspiracy Theories, hopefully you have an initial understanding of the academic pursuit of understanding conspiracy theories and some of the factors that drive them. This article is, of course, in stark contrast to what we read in If You’re Not Paranoid, You’re Crazy. Here’s what I would like from you:
First, review our lesson on logical fallacies, then choose a specific conspiracy theory mentioned in one of these articles (e.g. surveillance helicopters, Hollywood predicted 9/11, etc) and identify logical fallacies present in the conspiracy that you have chosen. For example, you might choose to discuss how confirmation bias, especially in the form of apophenia, drives the cherry-picking of evidence that sometimes leads to these conspiracy theories appearing to be more credible than they actually are.
Next, tell us what theory you have chosen, what fallacies you find presented in the alleged evidence and logic supporting said theory, and how these fallacies undermine support for said fallacy.
Note: You may choose to focus on a conspiracy theory that is not mentioned in either of these articles, but be sure to connect your discussion in some way to the articles so that I can be sure you have completed the assigned readings.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services