The readings and videos this week explored how the East is meeting the West. We

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

The readings and videos this week explored how the East is meeting the West. We read about many factors that influence our individualism and collectivism. The purpose of this week’s debate is to argue whether or not technology is driving such globalization.
You will participate in this debate by completing two tasks: (a) posts and (b) one reply. When participating in the debate, apply the scientific method to develop robust and scientifically-sound arguments.
You have learned how critical thinking and course debates parallels the theory and hypothesis testing, methodology and experimentation, data collection and analysis, and acceptance or rejection of hypotheses and concluding arguments. Theory and hypothesis development occur as you learn about a topic (in this case, the experience economy) and develop an argument for or against the motion posed in the debate. Methodology refers to the gathering of sources of information and evaluating potential biases or validity/reliability concerns with both peer-reviewed and non-referred sources. Data collection and analysis involves gathering and assessing the actual information in these sources. Hypothesis testing and conclusions occur when you post your debate arguments and then respond to a counter-argument from your group members (i.e., where they improperly substantiated or overly simplified; what reliability and validity issues are present in the source of information and data used to justify the claim?). In this way, you participate in a peer-review process where your “manuscripts” are critiqued by peers, and they have to respond to the “reviewers” concerns to justify their “science.”
Also, pay attention to the difference between theories (statement demonstrated or verified empirically) and opinions (a belief or attitude that has not been tested), and arguments built on reason (conclusions that can be clearly and logically explained or justified) and prejudice (preconceived judgments based on feelings, not reason). An important part of the scientific method is being aware of personal biases and evaluating our beliefs. Course debates encourage the development of these skills by exposing you to a variety of contradictory, sometimes extremely different, perspectives. You are required to identify a group member’s argument contrary to your own and identify the argument, evaluate the sources of information on which the argument is based, evaluate the evidence in favor of the argument, and critique the logic of the argument itself.
Part 1. Posts
Each student must submit a Group Discussion Initial Post by Thursday using the following guidelines.
A. State your position
Hit “reply” and in the first line of your post, state whether you (a) strongly disagree, (b) disagree, (c) agree, or (d) strongly agree with the following statement:
Technology is the main driver bringing the East closer to the West.
B. Defend your position
Then, in the same “reply,” explain your position on the statement above. Your response must be between 250 and 300 words to be eligible for full credit (10 points). There are no right or wrong answers; grading will be based on how well you integrate the material from the readings to support your position. 2 pts. Include at least two materials from class (i.e., textbook chapters, readings, videos, etc). Correctly use APA in-text formatting and a correctly-formatted reference list for eligibility for full credit.
Part 2. Debate Reply
Each student must reply to one of their group members’ Initial Posts by Friday using the following guidelines.
First, perform a quick peer evaluation of your group member’s post. To do this, read the post through once quickly without pausing to write comments. Then put the post aside and answer the following questions without looking back (if you can’t answer the question, write “I don’t know.”) (a) What single feature of the post stands out to you as a reader? (b) What do you think is the writer’s main point? (c) Was there anything in the paper that seemed confusing to you? If so, explain briefly. Write your answers to these questions in five sentences or less.
Next, reread the post in greater detail and summarize whether you largely agree or disagree with their position. Identify an argument they used to support their position that you felt was strong. Explain why you thought it was strong. Also, identify an argument they used to support their position that you felt was weak, and explain why you thought it was weak. Last, summarize an argument against their position that they did not include in their Post. This argument can be one discussed in your Post.
Your entire submission (peer evaluation and detailed reply) to your group member’s post must be between 100 and 150 words to be eligible for full credit (10 points). Try to address all the questions mentioned above. Include at least one material from class (i.e., textbook chapters, readings, videos, etc). Correctly use in-text formatting; however, no reference list is required if the full citation was included in the original post. If you introduce a new citation, or the original post does not have a reference list, you must include a reference list for full credit.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services