Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
QUESTION
Shirley Chisholm’s Ethical and Inclusive Leadership
Who is an ethical and inclusive leader? And what are the key attributes that one ought to display to be classified as a leader promoting egalitarianism? Such questions aim to guide the key concepts of this research as we evaluate Shirley Chisholm, the first African American woman to run for Congress and seek nomination for presidential candidacy in the years 1968 and 1972, respectively (Michals, 2015). Thus, based on the aforementioned queries, an ethical and inclusive leader can be categorized as one who acts on a set of principles and values that ensure fair treatment and equal administration of opportunities to all despite their social status, race, ethnicity, or religion (Tamunomiebi & Ehior, 2019). Consequently, he/she should outline the key traits of integrity, respect, fairness, and transparency that ought to structure positive relationships among individuals, teams, and the organization. Based on Shirley Chisholm, this paper evaluates her ethical culture, ethical leadership, ethical challenges, stakeholders’ unison, galvanization of support, and her legacy.
How Shirley Chisholm Demonstrates and Promotes a Positive Ethical Culture
An ethical culture is one in which the organization’s top managers or employees are guided by a set of values compelling them to do the right thing. Lighthouseserv (2019) states that for one to accurately demonstrate a positive ethical culture within an organization, he/she needs to create an ethics-based environment that clearly outlines his/her value statement as well as the code of conduct. Consequently, within Shirley Chisholm’s organization, she demonstrates these qualities through her various strong value statements that communicate her set of principles.
The famous Shirley Chisholm value statements that guided her principles include: “unbought and unbossed” and “if they don’t give you a seat at the table, bring a folding chair” (DiMauro, 2022). By projecting herself as being unbought nor unbossed, Chisholm promotes a positive ethical culture of transparency and respect, key traits that shape the leadership of any successful organization. Simply, through it, she communicates to her colleagues the values that they are supposed to embody and the roadmap that is supposed to guide their actions and decisions when handling matters pertaining to the public/governmental services. On the other hand, by bringing a folding chair to the table, Chisholm champions the concept of inclusivity. Through this phrase, Chisholm aims to tailor an organization that is not guided by the bases of race, religion, or ethnicity but one that considers individuals based on their ideologies and merit. Hence, her seven-year term representing women and the minority in the United States house of representatives.
How Chisholm Demonstrates Ethical leadership
Diversity
Shirley Chisholm’s efforts to abolish literacy tests champion her ethical leadership in promoting diversity. Literacy tests were examinations issued by the state of New York to all the non-natives who had recently migrated to the United States. Thus, through them, the New York state assessed the literacy levels of each individual, an activity that Chisholm defended against in the state assembly. The primary reason for her disparity was that it was illogical to determine someone’s capabilities based on a language that he/she did not understand (DiMauro, 2022). Hence, a person may function much better through his/her native language, thereby unjustifying his/her classification as an illiterate/unproductive individual.
Inclusivity
In promoting inclusivity, Chisholm’s ethical leadership is discernible through the various bills that she championed and sponsored. While in office, some of the bills that she sponsored and paved the way for their federal funding include: a bill on children’s education and welfare and a bill to guarantee annual minimum wages for the poor (Ogundana, 2020). Moreover, Chisholm championed immigration rights and women’s rights. By promoting migration rights, she aimed to help people of color easily obtain citizenship and an easy pass into the United States. On the other hand, her focus on women’s rights was geared toward increasing women’s leadership positions; thence, her contribution to the formation of the congressional women caucus in 1977 (DiMauro, 2022). Through the women’s caucus, Chisholm advanced their inclusivity by pushing for their interests in Congress and publicizing legislative activities important to them.
Social Change
Chisholm’s key advances in achieving a positive social change can be noted in her efforts to promote racial desegregation. These efforts can be related to her visit to George Wallace and her relentless promotion of the civil rights movement. By paying a hospital visit to George Wallace, an avowed supporter of racial segregation, Chisholm communicated the importance of unity regardless of race by stating- “I would not want what happened to you to happen to anyone” (DiMauro, 2022). Additionally, her efforts to aid the civil rights movement can be attributed to her zeal in advocating for social justice that later enabled African Americans to obtain equal rights as the native whites.
Ethical Challenges Faced and Overcame
Ethical challenges experienced by Shirley Chisholm during her political campaigns were discrimination and conflicts of interest. Michals (2015) outlines instances of Shirley’s discrimination that rendered her a double-handicap, meaning one that is both female and black. Consequently, this act of discrimination can be traced to the 1972 democratic party presidential nomination, where Chisholm was unlawfully barred from participating in the televised primary debates. Regarding Chisholm’s conflict of interest, an excellent instance can be noted from her speech during the announcement of her presidential bid in 1972. In her speech, Chisholm states that she was not focused on creating a black America or a women’s movement although she was a proud black and a proud woman for that matter (Lowen, 2020). This is indication that she had the competing forces of race and gender, necessitating her loyalty and favor distribution.
In order to overcome her unlawful sidelining at the presidential nomination, Chisholm obtained a legal action, while to avoid the conflicts of interest, she raised her own campaign money. By taking legal action, Chisholm was allowed to take part in the televised presidential nominations, although she was only accorded one speech from which she managed to obtain at least 152 votes supporting her candidature (Michals, 2015). In terms of raising her own campaign money, Chisholm avoided conflicts of interest usually propagated by endorsements received from personal affiliations. Specifically, Lowen (2020) approximates her total expenditure to about $300,000 in the entire electioneering process held between July 1971 and July 1972.
Sample Solutions
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Phasellus hendrerit. Pellentesque aliquet nibh nec urna. In nisi neque, aliquet vel, dapibus id, mattis vel, nisi. Sed pretium, ligula sollicitudin laoreet viverra, tortor libero sodales leo, eget blandit nunc tortor eu nibh. Nullam mollis. Ut justo. Suspendisse potenti.
Get sample solution
Order Now
Sed egestas, ante et vulputate volutpat, eros pede semper est, vitae luctus metus libero eu augue. Morbi purus libero, faucibus adipiscing, commodo quis, gravida id, est. Sed lectus. Praesent elementum hendrerit tortor. Sed semper lorem at felis. Vestibulum volutpat, lacus a ultrices sagittis, mi neque euismod dui, eu pulvinar nunc sapien ornare nisl. Phasellus pede arcu, dapibus eu, fermentum et, dapibus sed, urna.
Morbi interdum mollis sapien. Sed ac risus. Phasellus lacinia, magna a ullamcorper laoreet, lectus arcu pulvinar risus, vitae facilisis libero dolor a purus. Sed vel lacus. Mauris nibh felis, adipiscing varius, adipiscing in, lacinia vel, tellus. Suspendisse ac urna. Etiam pellentesque mauris ut lectus. Nunc tellus ante, mattis eget, gravida vitae, ultricies ac, leo. Integer leo pede, ornare a, lacinia eu, vulputate vel, nisl.
Suspendisse mauris. Fusce accumsan mollis eros. Pellentesque a diam sit amet mi ullamcorper vehicula. Integer adipiscing risus a sem. Nullam quis massa sit amet nibh viverra malesuada. Nunc sem lacus, accumsan quis, faucibus non, congue vel, arcu. Ut scelerisque hendrerit tellus. Integer sagittis. Vivamus a mauris eget arcu gravida tristique. Nunc iaculis mi in ante. Vivamus imperdiet nibh feugiat est.
Ut convallis, sem sit amet interdum consectetuer, odio augue aliquam leo, nec dapibus tortor nibh sed augue. Integer eu magna sit amet metus fermentum posuere. Morbi sit amet nulla sed dolor elementum imperdiet. Quisque fermentum. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis xdis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Pellentesque adipiscing eros ut libero. Ut condimentum mi vel tellus. Suspendisse laoreet. Fusce ut est sed dolor gravida convallis. Morbi vitae ante. Vivamus ultrices luctus nunc. Suspendisse et dolor. Etiam dignissim. Proin malesuada adipiscing lacus. Donec metus. Curabitur gravida