Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
I’m stuck on a Psychology question and need an explanation.
-What is your health goal for summer? Go to the gym more often? Stop binging Netflix? Quit smoking? Having trouble sticking to it already? For 3 weeks you will track your daily behavior in a health-relevant area of your choice to see if you can improve/change your habits. You will be responsible for writing a 5-page paper (in APA style: Times New Roman, 12-pt font, first line indent, heading levels).
Your paper should include one of the health models we discuss in class or be anchored on one of the other concepts we discuss through the course that applies to your 3-week health project. You will document your “methods” (i.e., did you use an iWatch/FitBit to keep track of workouts), and your findings. Include a section on your challenges and difficulties, and things you learned along the way.
The title, abstract, & reference pages don’t count towards the 5 pages
-I went to training classes taught by a personal trainer, 3 days a week with a full food diet plan for a whole month. Started on 07/05/2019, ended on 07/26/2019. The diet plan is attached. Used Electronic Digital Handheld BMI Monitor – Body Mass Index Analyzer Machine with LCD Display Readout, Sports Body Fat Measurement Percentage Device (Method). I started with 30% body fat percentage and 150 pounds, by the end of the 3 weeks I was down to 28% body fat and have lost 6 pounds total.
-The health models and self-regulation slides are attachedAnalytical essay assignment english 102
I’m studying for my English class and need an explanation.
English 102: Essay #2
Rhetorical Analysis
Genre: Analytical
Length: 3-5 pages
Format: MLA
Assignment
Write a rhetorical analysis that analyzes a primary text. You may choose from the speeches in Blackboard or contact your instructor to request approval to analyze a different speech. Links for the speeches and additional resources are provided at the end of this document.
As you read the speech, identify and make note of each time the speaker appeals to the logic, ethics, or emotion of the audience. The rhetorical appeals (logos, ethos, and pathos) are the lenses for your analysis. Review your textbook and the Forest of Rhetoric website to gain understanding of the importance and function of rhetorical appeals.
Student Learning Outcomes
De-center enough to ask tough questions about your writing and apply the fundamental principles of critical thinking to all writings and readings Read “tough”—that is: read to evaluate, read to analyze, and read to think. You will be able to summarize whole articles, paraphrase relevant passages from these articles, draw inferences from the readings, and then reach your own conclusions on tough issues
Key Points
Introduction:
Introduce the reader to the speech and your argument, which requires a clear understanding of the rhetorical situation
Who is the speaker? What is the social context of the speech (what is happening)? Is the speech effective? How do you know?
Thesis statement
What is your claim/argument?
Body Paragraphs:
Analyze the rhetorical appeals and devices used in the speech, which requires understanding of the appeals and devices as analytical tools. Each paragraph requires a clear topic sentence that introduce the appeal used in the paragraph in relation to your thesis statement. Some helpful questions to help develop each body paragraph include:
Topic sentence:
What appeal is used and what is the purpose?
Development:
How is the appeal identified? What words or phrases identify the appeal? How does the appeal relate to the speaker’s purpose? Is the appeal used effectively or ineffectively? What does the speaker not say? Why is important that the speaker avoids that point? Why would it be helpful for the speaker to address that point?
Transitional sentence
Conclusion
Apply your argument to a higher level Wrap-up all lose ends in your essay
Sources
For the analytical essay, you will broaden your knowledge of research and format by incorporating three sources into your text. This task should build on the knowledge gained during the Persuasive Essay process. The first source is your primary text. This is the text you are analyzing. Two outside sources are also required. You will locate these sources in the library’s databases. They may be journal, magazine, or newspaper articles—the choice is yours. However, they all must be reputable sources, and you should incorporate each source into your essay in a manner that helps develop your analysis. Remember that incorporating sources requires an introduction, quote, in-text citation, and bibliographic entry. Utilize your Noodle Tools account to help manage your research, citations, and Works Cited page.
Required Sources
Primary text Two outside sources from the library’s databases
Both sources must be located in the library’s databases
Databases
Consider beginning your research with one of the following databases:
Opposing Viewpoints Points of View Reference Center NewsBank
Each database is user friendly and easy to locate in the EN102 Library Guide under “Find Subject Specific Articles”.
Speeches
“I Have Dream” by Dr. King
“The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel
“Gender Equality is Your Issue Too” by Emma Watson
Other Speeches (American Rhetoric Website)
Rhetorical Appeals
Forest of Rhetoric: Rhetorical Appeals and DefinitionsCommenting on two classmates discussion on civil commitment to prevent future crimes: nursing coursework help
Need help with my Law question – I’m studying for my class.
I chose oppose the use of civil commitment to prevent future crimes.
Then, post two responses to the discussion thread on the opposing viewpoint. In your responses, be sure to use ethical arguments that support your assigned viewpoint
Classmate # 1 Christina
Although I support the use of civil commitment, I do not think that it should be used as a crime prevention tool. Testa & West explain the ethical implications of civil commitment, “Physicians’ professional responsibilities are derived from the ethical principles of medical practice dating back to the time of Hippocrates. The first and foremost principle of medical ethics is the principle of nonmaleficence—the physician’s duty to “do no harm.” One way that physicians can avoid harming patients is by showing respect for their autonomy (i.e., by allowing patients to make their own decisions regarding whether to accept or reject recommended medical care). Physicians are also bound by a professional obligation to help patients. This duty is prescribed by the ethical principle of beneficence,1,2 which requires that doctors provide to patients services that will benefit them (2010).” Committing someone to an institution, especially involuntarily, can send a person much further over the edge than they already are. People who are committed need around the clock care and medication to subdue the outbursts and otherwise outwardly erratic behaviors often displayed by patients who have psychological disorders. Many times a person may know right from wrong but have no impulse control. There is a difference between an irresistible impulse and an impulse not resisted. People who have irresistible impulses are the ones who may need more psychiatric care. When a person just acts on impulse by choice they are displaying defiant behavior that if need be should be met with consequences through the criminal justice system. To use civil commitment as a form of punishment with eventually lead to an over medicated population that doesn’t need it and could create a whole other host of issues within the jail system. I feel that people who generally get committed to lifelong sentences in a mental hospital or institution actually belong there and could possible thrive in life through the proper interventions.
Classmate # 2 Ryan
In my case to support civil commitments if have found that, “hospitalization is often a critical first step in initiation of psychiatric care. For this reason, involuntary hospitalization, or civil commitment, has been a mainstay of psychiatric care since the inception of the field”. (Testa & West, 2010)
The state plays a big role in civil commitment. There are two main legal principles in the civil commitment process known as “parent of the country” and “police power”. Parent of the country “refers to a doctrine from English common law that assigns to the government a responsibility to intervene on behalf of citizens who cannot act in their own best interest”. (Testa & West, 2010) Police power “requires a state to protect the interests of its citizens”. (Testa & West, 2010) “The state has the right to write statutes for the benefit of society at large, even when providing this benefit may come at the cost of restricting the liberties of certain individuals.” (Testa & West, 2010)
While I don’t think civil commitments work in every scenario they are certainly a great tool for medical providers and the state to utilize in providing services to those in need, or unwilling to obtain help.]=]