Risk Factors

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I need an explanation for this Social Science question to help me study.

You have learned risk factors for children in foster care, and risk factors for individual family members, and the family unit of military service members. In addition to risks, you have been asked to analyze resiliency of the various individuals, families, and groups within society. As a human service professional it is imperative to understand risks and resiliency. This is necessary to better offer programming to increase success for members of society presently at risk for negative outcomes.

For this Assignment please answer the following:

Part 1

Examine a societal issue impacting a family and discuss risks factors for this group as a whole and as individuals.

Part 2

Using the same societal issue impacting a family in Part 1, please distinguish resiliency between individual family members and the family unit.

Part 3

Analyze resilience theory by explaining salient points of this theoretical construct.

Part 4

In Part 1, risks for individual family members and the family unit were applied. In part 2, resiliency was applied to individual family members and the family unit. In part 3, resiliency theory is analyzed. For this final part it is now necessary to differentiate interventions that can be utilized with individual family members, and the entire family with the purpose of increasing resiliency.

This paper should be 4–6 pages (not including the cover page and reference page) in APA style format. Your paper should include a minimum of three academic peer-reviewed journal articles. Provide appropriate citations and references for any information you use in this paper. For help with citations, refer to the APA Quick Reference. For additional writing help, visit the Writing Center and review the guidelines for research, citation, and plagiarism.Analyze problems of everyday life: nursing homework help
Need help with my Communications question – I’m studying for my class.

Please give me the outline(one page explanation) in 6 hours. With what situation you will write about, which two concept you will choose, and then I will upload the readings of concept you choose.

What was that about? Why do they keep doing this thing that’s not working? They always do this. Everyday life is usually familiar, habitual — those happenings and practices we rarely take notice of. But breakdowns happen. These can include, but aren’t limited to, miscommunication, mistreatment, problematic patterns, marginalization, or devaluation of that which you value. This project asks you to identify a breakdown and use tools from the course to gain insight.

For the final, you will choose one breakdown, observe and describe it in thoughtful detail, and analyze the situation using two different theories from the course. Conclude by reflecting on what you have learned in the course. For this project, a breakdown can be any situation you find problematic.

Process

1. Plan and observe: Choose the problematic situation you want to analyze. Write notes on your memories of the situation. Carefully observe and make notes about people, practices, and spaces related to the situation. Choose the two readings you would like to use to shed light on why the situation happened.

2. Write a 1 page note explain the problematic situation, your observations to date, why it is important or interesting to you, and what readings you think you might draw on to shed light on the problem.

3. Write up the final deliverable: Your final project will be a report with the following four sections. Make sure you have incorporated feedback from your TA. The format should be 12 pt double spaced with 1-inch margins:

I. Description of the problematic situation: Who and what practices did it involve? What details of the situation offer clues or evidence for understanding what happened and why? Offer evidence from your notes and observations. (1-1.5 pages)

II. Analysis using the first reading from the course (1 page)

You have to observe people in your everyday life. And use the concept to explain it

III. Analysis using the second reading from the course (1 page)

You have to observe people in your everyday life. And use the concept to explain it

IV. Reflection on how what you observed and analyzed is different from how you would have understood the situation before 100A (1-1.5 pages)

V. Appendix: Notes on your observations

Here is the concepts…Please told me which concept you will choose…
Theme / Key Concepts

Theory Reading

Example Reading

Mediating the Person: Infrastructure
Torque Infrastructure Classification
Bowker & Star Ch 1

Bowker & Star Ch 6

Mediating the Person: Communities of Practice
Communities of Practice Legitimate peripheral participation Membership Visibility / Invisibility
Lave & Wenger, pp. 52-58, 76-79

Forte & Bruckman

Irani

Mediating the Person: Institutions
Access Description Labor
Cavallo (2015)

Dr. Louise Hickman’s lecture
Membership Body project Body as process Body as product Passing Fragmentation Multiplicity
Ong (2005)

Ong (2005)

Conveying the Person: Infrastructures, Movement, and Community
Space-time compression Power geometry Social differentiation Progressive sense of place
Massey (1991)

Rivera (2006), Sleep Dealer
Strategies Tactics
DeCerteau pp. 25-26, 29-37, 91-93APA Style Reflection Paper
I’m stuck on a Psychology question and need an explanation.

Content – Student provides a comprehensive 1 1/2 – 2 page reflection of the reading(s), incorporating examples and evidence from the article to support his/her reflection.

Personal Reflection – Student provides a good personal reflection on the readings, identifying specific ideas or concepts that he/she connected with or found interesting.

Grammar/Spelling/APA – Reflection was well written with minimal technical errors and was APA compliantPublic Service Ethics
I don’t know how to handle this Political Science question and need guidance.

The tabletop exercise serves to provide students with a framework for the application of ethical decision-making in real-world scenarios. For each scenario, your small group will be assigned a role which you are to assume. After reviewing the scenario and the assigned role, form a small group response outlining your decision and the reasoning behind it. Be sure to consider ethical theories and principles and answer in earnest. Your decision may not always be the most ethical choice, however you should explain the constraints in your decision-making process and state relevant reasons for your response. Responses should be at least one page and should be well thought out, organized, and thorough. Be sure to submit your group response by the due date according to instructions. Also, be sure to title each of your responses with the name of the scenario (e.g., Bad Boss) and your role (e.g., Executive Director).

Reviewing the Tabletop Exercise from this week’s Learning Resources.
Respond to the questions in the scenario from the perspective of the role to which you have been assigned Analyze the ethical implications of your question responses and justify your responses
Look at Table Top Ex. Attachment

Scenario 5—Bad Boss: Independent Auditor (1 page)

Scenario 4—Bad Parent: Neighbor (1 Page)

Scenario 3—Bad Teacher: PTA President (1 Page)

Scenario 2—Bad Cop: Community Member (1 Page)

Scenario 1—Bad President: Industry Executive/Dono (1 Page)

APA Format

References:
Public Service Ethics: Individual and Institutional Responsibilities
Chapter 9, “Corruption Control” (pp. 165-200)

Chapter 10, “Whistleblowing in Organizations” (pp. 201-227)

Bowman, J. S., & West, J. P. (2015).
Blind Spots
Chapter 5, “When We Ignore Unethical Behavior” (pp. 77-99)

Bazerman, M., & Tenbrunsel, A. (2011).
To Serve with Honor: Doing the Right Thing in Government
Chapter 6, “How Do Organizations Foster Unethical Behavior?” (pp. 71-86)

Newell, T. (2015).

The Whistleblower
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 120 minutes

Piovesan, C. (Producer), Rattray, C. (Producer), Kondracki, L. (Director). (2010). The whistleblower [Motion picture]. United States: Samuel Goldwyn Films.COMM 130: Application Paper: Interpersonal Relationship Analysis: Becoming less defensive in relationships: online nursing assignment help
I’m working on a Communications question and need guidance to help me study.

Description and Purpose:

The application paper will assess successful analysis of the self and improving an interpersonal relationship. It also includes research and applying concepts to a variety of interpersonal relationships and their contexts to help manage and resolve conflicts. Adler and Proctor (2017) describe the importance of applying concepts to a variety of interpersonal contexts, which take into consideration how we communicate through the symbolic aspects of language and the physiological, psychological, and cultural factors that shape us in relation to interpersonal relationships. Becoming a better individual through behavioral and attitude change is paramount in interpersonal relationships.

Instructions:

Instructions:
Create an essay with an introduction (includes an attention-getter, thesis, and main points), body, and conclusion (restate thesis, main points, and have last impression). Choose a topic for your interpersonal relationship analysis. Below are some examples:
Enhancing relationships with friends Improving romantic relationships Improving relationships with relatives Enhancing relationships with parents Improving relationships with siblings Improving relationships with family members Improving relationships with extended family Overcoming shyness in relationships Becoming less defensive in relationships Becoming more responsible in relationships Etc.
Explain your close relationship(s). Define and explain close relationships in terms of intimacy and its 4 dimensions. Provide examples of each. Explain conflict encountered. Define and explain conflict, its characteristics, and the five conflict styles (competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating). Provide examples of each. Explain how you will become better in the relationship by applying two or more of the following concepts from our required textbook, such as listening, empathy, responsibility for feelings, perception checking, showing effective emotions, etc. Explain how you will improve your relationship with each step of the win-win collaborative problem-solving and provide lessons learned and growth.Requirements
It must be 1,400 words minimum. It is typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman, size 12 font, and submitted as a MS-Word document via Canvas by the due date. College-level writing is expected with proper spelling, grammar, vocabulary, and diction. Arguments must have relevant examples and strong reasoning. Define, explain, and apply the concepts (please see questions 2-5) by citing our required textbook in APA. Cite at least three credible outside sources (e.g., scholarly journal articles, documentaries, encyclopedias, magazines, book reviews, chapter reviews, news articles, studies from websites) which are defined and explained well. All sources must be cited properly by summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting using APA in-text citations and include all sources in the References page.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services