Rhetorical Analysis And Summary Exercise, Second Reading

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m studying for my English class and need an explanation.

Read “What Nobody Told Me About Small Organic Farming: I Can’t Make a Living” by Jaclyn Moyer. As you read, make marks in the margin or on a separate piece of paper when you notice aspects of the article that you find interesting or surprising.

Part 1 (101 Review):

Once you have finished reading and taking notes, right a short (minimum 400 words) response of your initial impressions. Include rhetorical analysis: What kind of purpose do you believe the authors had for writing this essay? How do you know? What kinds of choices do the authors make that help you come to this conclusion? Who is the audience for this article? How do you know?

Part 2 (Summary):

Write a 250-word summary of “What Nobody Told Me About Organic Farming: I Can’t Make a Living.” Your summary should:
Demonstrate a strong understanding of the authors’ ideas using your own words Describe the authors’ moves in the article, not plot points Focus on key points, not details Remain objective, avoiding first person (“I”) and second person (“You”)
Begin your summary by using the author’s last name and a verb, such as “Bittman, et al, believe that…” or later, “The authors claim that…”

Part 3 (Response):

Write a brief (200 words), informal, and clear response to the authors’ ideas. You could disagree with the author (and explain why), agree partially (and explain why), agree fully and expand on what the authors say with your own ideas, etc. It is acceptable but not necessary to use the first person in your response. For example, you might begin your response with, “I agree with the authors, but they fail to consider…”capstone project partial draft 1: nursing case study help
I’m trying to learn for my Law class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Assignment Description
In Unit 2, you proposed a topic and prepared your Criminal Justice Capstone Project Overview and Outline. Based on the feedback from your instructor, ensure you adjust your topic to enable you to meet all project requirements. Drafting will begin this unit. Throughout the units, you will build out your project content specific to each competency.
Instructions
In this unit, you will prepare your draft addressing the following competency based on your topic. Note: Use a library tool, such as RefWorks, to track your sources for the duration of your Criminal Justice Capstone Project.

Explain the antecedents and consequences of crime in the broader context of interdisciplinary knowledge.
Explain the antecedents of the crime, connecting knowledge from multiple disciplines. Explain the consequences of crime, connecting knowledge from multiple disciplines.
Requirements
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting. Number of References: 2–3 peer-reviewed references. Length of paper: 3–4 typed double-spaced pages. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Use the scoring guide for headings and hit distinguished in all areas of the scoring guide.

Scoring guide
Criteria Non-performance Basic Proficient Distinguished
Explain the antecedents of the crime, connecting knowledge from multiple disciplines based on the Criminal Justice Capstone Project topic selection draft. 45% Does not explain the antecedents of the crime, connecting knowledge from multiple disciplines based on the Criminal Justice Capstone Project topic selection draft. Partially explains the antecedents of the crime, connecting knowledge from multiple disciplines based on the Criminal Justice Capstone Project topic selection draft. Explains the antecedents of the crime, connecting knowledge from multiple disciplines based on the Criminal Justice Capstone Project topic selection draft. Thoroughly explains the antecedents of the crime, connecting knowledge from multiple disciplines based on the Criminal Justice Capstone Project topic selection draft.
Explain the consequences of crime, connecting knowledge from multiple disciplines based on the Criminal Justice Capstone Project topic selection draft. 45% Does not explain the consequences of crime, connecting knowledge from multiple disciplines based on the Criminal Justice Capstone Project topic selection draft. Partially explains the consequences of crime, connecting knowledge from multiple disciplines based on the Criminal Justice Capstone Project topic selection draft. Explains the consequences of crime, connecting knowledge from multiple disciplines based on the Criminal Justice Capstone Project topic selection draft. Comprehensively explains the consequences of crime, connecting knowledge from multiple disciplines based on the Criminal Justice Capstone Project topic selection draft.
Employ the professional communication skills expected of a criminal justice practitioner. 10% Does not employ the professional communication skills expected of a criminal justice practitioner. Partially employs the professional communication skills expected of a criminal justice practitioner. Employs the professional communication skills expected of a criminal justice practitioner. Thoroughly employs the professional communication skills expected of a criminal justice practitioner.Revise your annotated bibliography
I need help with a English question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Instructions

By the due date assigned, submit your revised Annotated Bibliography.

Revise your annotated bibliography based on the feedback you have received from your instructor and your peers. Proofread your work carefully, ensuring that your in-text citations and reference entries conform to APA style. Use this APA Citation Helper for guidance.

INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE ANNOTATED Bibliography:

By the due date assigned post a rough draft of your annotated bibliography, following the assignment guidelines below.

By the end of week, comment on at least two of your classmates’ submissions, following the Peer Response Guidelines below.

Assignment Guidelines

After deciding on the topic for your researched argumentative essay, locate at least three credible sources in the South University Online Library. (You may include more if you like.) Take notes on your sources, following the methods outlined in the Week 3 lecture about note-taking. For each source, note the main idea, evaluate the credibility of the author, and consider how the text relates to your topic. Remember to create your references as you search for use in the bibliography and locating the articles again when you begin writing the essay.

Steps to Take
Draft a references page in APA format. Include at least three sources. After each reference entry, provide a paragraph about the source, including the following:
Summarize relevant information from the source. Evaluate the credibility of the author. Explain how the source relates to the position you plan to argue in your research paper.
View some annotated bibliography examples.

Here is help for Creating Annotated Bibliographies.

MY BIBLIOGRAPHY,AND MY INSTRUCTORS COMMENTS:

I have decided to research corporal punishment in children as my argumentative essay. There is a saying” spare the rod spoil the child”. My parents have mentioned to me several times that I received spankings on several occasions, and I turned out just fine. I never used corporal punishment with my children and they turned out great. Several states still have corporal punishment within their school. I remember moving from Kansas without Corporal punishment to Louisiana where the school still incorporates corporal punishment within the school system, that was in 2008. Who is right?

I was helped by the librarian with this research , we found the following sources:

Title: MORE HARM THAN GOOD: A SUMMARY OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ON THE INTENDED AND UNINTENDED EFFECTS OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENT ON CHILDREN By: Elizabeth T. Gershoff, Law and Contemporary Problems, 00239186, , Vol. 73, Issue 2Database:JSTOR Journals.

This summary discussed corporal punishment, as an old fashion way of raising children. The summary also mentioned the religious view points on corporal punishment. In this summary the author discussed the modern-age rearing of children. Parents do have short- or long-term goals when they use corporal punishment to correct their child’s misbehavior. The author explains that the short-term goal is to get the child to stop engaging in the unacceptable behaviors immediately . The key to the long-term goal is to reduce the likelihood that the child will not repeat the undesirable behavior and to increase the likelihood that the child will behave in socially acceptable ways. The summary discusses the unintentional effects of corporal punishment to children, the mental health effects, and the physical injuries and abuse from using corporal punishment on children.
The effect of corporal punishment on antisocial behavior in children
Grogan-Kaylor, Andrew. Social Work Research; Oxford Vol. 28, Iss. 3, (Sep 2004): 153-162. DOI:10.1093/swr/28.3.153.

This research explains how they performed the research and listed several references .

I could not find a useful 3rd resource in the library, even with the help of the librarian.

I found this resource on the effects of corporal punishment in children , while researching online.

https://www.hellomotherhood.com/the-long-term-effects-of-physical-punishment-on-a-child-5646757.html

This article discusses the aggression, depression, poor resilience that could happen when children are exposed to corporal punishment. This article also discusses positive parenting skills to practice.

Hi Hope-Thanks for posting your discussion board response. Make sure to include a full reference for a website. You still have titles, authors, publication or last updated dates, etc. I’m glad the librarian was able to help. Did you find any counterarguments for your paper?Dr. Reamer
ReplyBalancing goals and empowering others
I need an explanation for this Law question to help me study.

No plagiarism please. Use headings for each criterion. Use references and hit the distinguished marks for all areas of the scoring guide.

Leaders are required to focus on several key areas that have vast impacts. Focusing on goals, leaders must understand the balance between setting goals that are achievable for an agency and raising the bar of expectations in order for personnel to exceed previous levels of performance. Failure to make goals attainable could result in a lack of effort by those tasked with attempting to reach the goals. Making goals too attainable could result in complacency.

Strategic planning is also connected to goal setting and is an important leadership function. The implementation of a strategic plan requires the assigning of projects and goals, both to individuals and throughout an organization. You will find that many of the people utilized in the implementation have never started anything from scratch.

In your main post:
Explain how a leader balances setting attainable goals against raising the bar to set the stage for enhanced performance. Describe how a leader empowers individuals involved in strategic planning to seize the opportunity and work outside their own comfort zones. Propose two best practices for optimizing employee performance through the setting of goals specific to a criminal justice organization. Assess the possible impacts of empowerment in the strategic planning process, using two criminal justice organization examples.
Scoring Guide
Criteria Non-performance Basic Proficient Distinguished
Main Discussion Post Response (60%)
Apply critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post. 50% Does not apply elements of critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post. Applies some elements of critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post. Applies critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post. Applies critical thinking or problem solving to the main discussion post in a comprehensive, step-by-step manner.
Use credible information or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion. 10% Does not use credible information or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion. Responds to the discussion, but some or all of the resources used for support are not credible. Uses credible information or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion. Uses well- developed, relevant support from credible resources or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion and impartially considers conflicting data or other perspectives.please read the attached article: online nursing assignment help
I’m trying to study for my Psychology course and I need some help to understand this question.

For this assignment, please read the attached article. Then, working on your own, answer the following questions:

1. At what point in the semester was the stress rating the highest? Did this surprise you? Why or why not?

2. The authors found gender differences in reported stress levels. What were the differences and why do you think they occurred?

3. The authors report a limitation of the study as the fact that it only included students who were current users of Twitter. Why is this a limitation? How do you think this impacted the results?

4. The authors report a limitation of the study as the fact that the majority of the participants were health science majors. Why is this a limitation? How do you think this impacted the results?

Your response should be a 1-2 page typed response, 12 pt. Times New Roman font, double spaced with 1″ margins and a .Word .doc or .docx.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services