Review And Analyze The Below Articles, Once Reviewed Summarize Each Article, What Is The Reason For The Conclusion And Why?

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m trying to learn for my Business Law class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

John Discussion Post #1

The defendant Carz Bazaar has a strong case that they should not be responsible for the accident of Charles Wilson. The company has a procedure for key-control. Under the procedure, the attendant inputs all necessary information into a template request form and the reason must always be for company use only (University of Maryland Global Campus, 2020). Charles Wilson and Gina Mitchell did not follow those procedures. They have both violated the company’s policy. In this case, Charles Wilson and Gina Mitchell are responsible for the accident. A frolic and detour will be the general defense of Carz Bazaar. A “frolic and detour” is a general defense to vicarious tort liability (University of Maryland Global Campus, 2020). The principal should not be responsible for the tortious acts of the agents when the agents are acting outside the scope of the employer. It is also stated that and employees who is on a frolic or detour is no longer acting for the employer (University of Maryland Global Campus, 2020).

Tiffany Discussion Post #2

After an analysis of the Carz Bazaar case and the arguments for the plaintiffs as well as the defendant, it is my opinion that the defendant, Carz Bazaar, has the stronger defense and is most likely to win the case. The most important piece of evidence in this case is that Wilson acted outside of the scope of employment for Carz Bazaar. He broke company rules and took a company car to run a personal errand. All of the arguments and defenses for the plaintiffs in this case are null if it can be proven that Wilson acted outside of the scope of employment. Duty to indemnify and vicarious liability both have clauses within the defense that state that if the agent acted outside of the scope of employment than the principal (employer) is no longer held liable for the damages that the agent committed through an unintentional tort.

Most importantly, I think that the defendant has the strongest defense under frolic and detour. This defense applies perfectly to the Carz Bazaar incident and really does not leave any room for misinterpretation. The bottom line is that at the time of the accident, Wilson was not an agent acting within the scope of his employment. As a result, Carz Bazaar has a solid legal defense in response to the lawsuit that the plaintiffs are bringing forward and I believe that they would be the winner of the lawsuit. I believe that the plaintiffs would have an easier time suing Charles Wilson directly than pursuing legal action against Carz Bazaar.

Charles Discussion Post #3

In this situation, plaintiff was absolutely right to file a case against Carz Bazaar, who is the employer of Charles Wilson who was involved in an accident while driving the company car. Even though Carz Bazaar might be performing a task with his company car for plaintiff, because they are a third party who request a service from Charles Wilson who is Carz employer, every expenses has to be billed to Charles. Any contract or services agreement was between plaintiff and Charles Wilson, that means it has nothing to do with the employee who has been assign to do the work. I had a similar experience some years ago, I hire a contractors to replace my roof and they sub contractor to another company. The employee of the sub contractor came and damage my property. even though they cause the problem, my lawyer and myself was only dealing with the main contractor i hire, as i have no business with the sub contractors who actual perform the job. so in this case plaintiffs has all the right to fire a case against charles wilson and not Carz

Ashley Discussion Post #4

After thoroughly reviewing the case details for the referenced case, it is my legal judgment that the plaintiff has a strong case to sue and win against Carz Bazaar. Here are key factors in the case that support the plaintiff’s win.

1. Wilson is an employee of the company. Therefore, the employer governs the employee during their work hours. The lunch break can be considered designated company time. And without policies that specifically state that employees are not allowed to drive vehicles for personal errands, Carz Bazaar may not have a defense.

2. Wilson made a request to his supervisor and the supervisor authorized his actions. That supervisor will be viewed as the leader approving the unethical decision. Because the employee had permission to drive the vehicle, it can be seen as instructional and the details of those instructions were very specific. I also see this as a form of implied agency since the request was made and granted. I believe it will be considered “respondeat superior.”

3. The case notes disclosed that sometimes vehicles historically are away from the lot for more than a day. That history further implicates Carz Bazaar as it sets a precedent of its practices which will be used against them. It proves that it is a normal business practice that they can be held liable for.

As I’ve experienced in many positions, this scenario will force Carz Bazaar to tighten up their company leadership model.

Bill Discussion post #5

After considering both sides of this case, it is my opinion that the defendant (Carz Bazaar) has the best chance of winning the case. If you assess the actions of Charles Wilson and Gina Mitchell in this case it could be said they both are the responsible parties. Through the defense called, “Frolic and Detour” it will remove Carz Bazaar from liability for agents actions. Frolic and Detour is defined as employee abandons employers business objectives and pursues personal interests and employee deviates from employers instructions (Agency & Liability, 2020). In this case, Charles and Gina committed both parts of this and essentially acted outside the employer’s interests. Gina’s actions of giving Charles the keys knowing it was prohibited by company policy and Charles taking a company car for a personal errand should open them up to be sued by the plaintiffs. Gina should be fired and Charles should be paying damages to the plaintiffs and to Carz Bazaar for the damages to the company vehicle.

Detmear Discussion post #6

Based on all the facts of the Carz Bazaar case and the arguments of both the plaintiffs and the defendants, the plaintiffs will most likely win the case in court. Carz Bazaar does have good legal arguments; however, the plaintiffs have a much stronger argument. According to Carz Bazaar, Charles was not authorized to operate its vehicle that was involved in the car accident, since he was using the vehicle for personal use, which is against company policy. However, based on the principle of “implied authority”, Charles had belief that Gina had the authority to make an exception to authorize him to use the company’s vehicle for a personal errand. Therefore, the respondeat superior doctrine, deems Carz Bazaar responsible for the damages. Furthermore, Carz Bazaar will also be held responsible based on strict liability (UMGC, n.d., p. 4). According to UMGC (n.d.), “Strict liability subjects an individual for activity that causes harm to another without regard for her intent or the standard of care she shows in carrying out that activity” (p. 4). Although Carz Bazaar will be responsible to pay the damages, Carz Bazaar can still hold both Charles and Gina responsible as well. According to agent law, employees are also responsible for their own actions and have a duty to follow all company policies (UMGC, n.d.). Carz Bazaar could sue both Charles and Gina for compensatory and punitive damages for the torts of conversion of property and negligence (UMGC, n.d.). In addition, the company can also elect to terminate both employees due to their disregard to the company policies.RELS.105,writing homework:The Formative Periods of the Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Traditions: assignment help online
I need an explanation for this History question to help me study.

Hello,

Forum: Students will write short 4-5 sentence paragraphs for each, they will be defining them using the Oxtoby/Hussain textbook readings.

Be sure to adhere to the following guidelines when you post your responses:

a. Make your thoughts coherent and your writing clear.

b. You must respond to the question in short 4-5 sentence paragraphs for each.

c. You must rely on the text(s)[the Oxtoby/Hussain textbook(Willard Oxtoby, Amir Hussain, and Roy Amore, eds., World Religions: Western Traditions, 4th edition (Oxford University Press, 2014) (ISBN 978-0-19-900287-0))]

All the terms/figures are in the file,Project management 3 questions need answered
I’m studying and need help with a Management question to help me learn.

The subject is Project Planning Essentials. BUSI 3623 Unit Case Study 2: Design Prototypes Inc: Project Management (B): Planning the Alpha C306 Project.

Questions:

1. What is the result of the Critical Path Analysis on the revised Work Breakdown Structure?

2. Based in the results of the revised Critical Path Analysis, is the project feasible within the 18-month timeline established by management? How long will it take to complete the project? What is the Critical Path?

3. What information should Raef include in his presentation to management?Unit 4 Writing Assignment 1
I don’t understand this Business question and need help to study.

**Write a 500 word response to the below:

Should people be led like they are machines or organisms? Use concepts and theories in Level Three Leadership as well as outside resources. Be sure to properly site you references using APA style.

Reading comes from: Chapter 10, 11, and 12 from

Clawson, J.G. (2012).Level Three Leadership, 5th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Pearson.ISBN: 978-0-13-2556415Discussion: Scholars of Change: online nursing assignment help
I don’t know how to handle this Management question and need guidance.

Discussion: Scholars of Change
As noted in the Learning Resources this week, health professionals can be leaders of social change. Consider the story of Paul Amigh, a student and teaching assistant at Walden:

My name is Paul Amigh (pronounced Ah-me’), and I am a student in the PhD Public Health program at Walden University with a concentration in Epidemiology and a Teaching Assistant for the School of Health Sciences bachelor’s degree programs. I have obtained my entire college experience from Walden University, and it has changed my life and given me the desire to change the lives of others.

I am a U.S. Army veteran who graduated from the Academy of Health Sciences, attended vocational school in Central PA for my L.P.N. license, and hold a BS in Public Health with a concentration in Health Informatics from Walden University. I have spent my life in service of my country and others working as medic, a prison nurse, travel nurse, and as a charge nurse in an advanced Alzheimer’s unit. Feeling a greater need to do more for my community and improve the lives of others, it was my bachelor’s degree from Walden University that gave me the opportunity to work in education. I began teaching medical assisting, medical billing and coding, and health informatics classes at a local technical school in Central Pennsylvania, but I still felt I could do more.

I created a local chapter of SkillsUSA and began to train students in leadership and skills competitions related to their chosen vocational career path. It was here I discovered students just need someone to believe in them. Spending a few hours each day training and working with these students to improve upon the soft skills employers are looking for in communication, conflict resolution, critical thinking, and fundraising the entire cost of membership and travel, I created Champions at Work. Over the last six years, I have personally trained and mentored more than 50 Pennsylvania State Gold Medalists and trained fifteen National Medalists, with five of them becoming national champions!

This October I stepped down from teaching and have been appointed as the new Public Health Program Administrator of Western Pennsylvania for the PA Department of Health’s Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program. This special Supplemental Nutrition Program provides Federal grants to States for supplemental foods, healthcare referrals, and nutrition education for low-income pregnant, breastfeeding, and non-breastfeeding postpartum women, and to infants and children up to age five who are found to be at nutritional risk. Established as a permanent program in 1974, WIC is considered the premiere public health program for the Department of Agriculture.

My dream is to not only complete my PhD from Walden University, but to someday call Walden University my employer and continue to work with some of the most amazing professors and mentors I have ever had the pleasure of learning from, getting to know them on a personal level, and changing the lives of more people just as Walden University changed mine.

As you prepare for this Discussion:
Reflect on how you would like to harness all you have learned to be an agent for social change in your community as a healthcare professional. View several videos from the Scholars of Change website.
By Day 4
Post a thoughtful response to the following:
Describe your personal commitment to positive social change in your community as a health professional. Explain how your Walden experience might have strengthened your ability to advocate for social change in your community. Explain two ways that your Program of Study might be strengthened to enhance student awareness of social change in the health field.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services