Results Amp Discussion

Question Description

Scientific Project: Results and DiscussionLearning Objectives:1) Identify patterns in personal health-related data collected.2) Evaluate the literature relating to a personal health topic.3) Compare personal results and trends to those found in the literature.4) Identify and explain limitations that were present during the experiment.Instructions:For this section of your scientific project, you are expected to present and discuss your resultsusing published, scholarly, scientific literature.Please use the following 3 subheadings to receive full credit:1) HypothesisRestate your hypothesis to clearly identify your independent and dependent variables.2) ResultsYou are expected to state your results in paragraph form. Your results must be presented incomplete sentences. You must complete the following to receive full credit:• At least 1 paragraph regarding the results you found. This should not only present yourdata, but also any changes you found (if any) from before the experiment to after theexperiment.• At least 1 visual representation of your data (graph, chart, figure). This visualrepresentation should enhance your written word, not replace it. Tables of data (suchas those used in Final Data Collection) will NOT be accepted as visual representation3) DiscussionFor this part of your project, you are expected to discuss your findings in relation to otherpublished scientific literature on the topic. Think of this section as a “compare and contrast”of your work to published scientific literature. You must use scholarly, scientific researcharticles published in academic journals. Websites of any kind, blog posts, and other nonacademic sources are not acceptable. Remember to CITE YOUR SOURCES IN AMA FORMAT.Be careful of automated citation generators, as they often make mistakes in properformatting. Please refer to this website for information on how to format your in-text citationsas well as your reference list: http://guides.lib.uw.edu/c.php?g=99161&p=642281. There isno length requirement for this section, however a thorough, comprehensive evaluation anddiscussion of your findings is expected, and difficult to achieve in less than 1 page. To receivefull credit on this section, your paper must include the following:• ALL literature discussed must come from academic journals.• Information from other sources must be stated in your own words to demonstratecomprehension. Using quotation marks to “give credit” to the author does not demonstrate yourunderstanding of the material.• Insightful comparisons should be made between your findings and those of at least 3 otherscientific articles.• Discuss your findings in relation to your hypothesis – did your results reveal what you hadpredicted? Why or why not?• Multiple limitations of your experiment must be discussed AND explained (including but notlimited to: # of participants, time frame, confounding variables, difficulty with adherence, etc.)

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services