Response To The Lecture

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Need help with my English question – I’m studying for my class.

The lectures you have reviewed this week will once again come be helpful when you begin writing Essay 1 next week, so please read and watch them at least twice. If you haven’t please go back to the previous item in this week’s module and check them out!

For now, I just want you to reflect a little bit on what you have read so far. Please answer the following questions:
Think of one time in real life that you have noticed a logical fallacy being committed (think news, speeches or commercials). What was it? Why was it an example of faulty logic? What made it illogical? Which one or two logical fallacies you learned about seemed most intriguing/interesting? Why?
Requirements:
Please respond in a full paragraph (5-7 sentences) for question 1 and 2.Reviewing Alternative Sources of Information: Part 2
I don’t understand this Psychology question and need help to study.

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, watch the Evaluating Web Resources (Links to an external site.) and Scholarly and Popular Resources (Links to an external site.) video tutorials from the Ashford University Library.

This paper is the second part of a two-part integration. Review the discussion threads you, your classmates, and your instructor posted in the Reviewing Alternative Sources of Information: Part 1 (Peer Feedback) discussion forum. Make note of constructive suggestions, integrate feedback and ideas into your analysis of the articles, and/or identify additional institutional, organizational or governmental agency sources if instructed to do so by your instructor. Incorporate this information into your paper.

Navigate to this week’s discussion forum to review your feedback if necessary.

In your Reviewing Alternative Sources of Information: Part 2 paper,
Critique each of the three sources from the gray literature that address your research topic or research focus, identifying the owner/sponsor of the source (the institutional, organizational or governmental agency) and describing the relationship between the mission or purpose of the institution, organization, or agency and the topic of interest to you. For example, if you identified a report or a summary of statistics from the Autism Research Institute, identify the mission or purpose of the Autism Research Institute and justify the use of the source as being appropriate to support research on your topic of interest. Provide a complete APA citation for each source. Consider accessing the Writing Center’s Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) for more on completing a complete reference citation. Analyze the information from each institutional, organizational, or governmental agency source, reporting how the various sources relate or link to one another and how the information is congruent or contradictory across the sources. For example, did you identify two different sets of data about your topic that offer collaborating (or contradictory) perspectives about your research topic or research focus? Report whether the information you found included references to scholarly articles or research, and whether the sources you identified link you to other relevant and credible sources. Evaluate the evidence of quality of each source, using the criteria introduced in the Discussion Forum.
Indicate whether there is evidence of lack of consistency or bias in the information you found Identify any ethical concerns you may have about the source
Explain how the information from these three sources can be used to reinforce the relevance or importance of your research topic or research focus, indicating how the sources will help you make a compelling case for studying the topic you have identified.
The Reviewing Alternative Sources of Information: Part 2 paper
Must be at least 1,200 words in length (not including title, abstract and references pages), and formaated according to the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.) Must reference at least two scholarly and/or credible sources (see Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.)), in addition to any required readings you cited. Must list the three sources analyzed in the reference list. Include title, abstract, and reference pages in your paper.
Use resources listed in the Week 1 assignment to help you correctly format your paper.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.ENG122: Objectivity and Bias: nursing assignment help
I need an explanation for this English question to help me study.

Objectivity and Bias [WLOs: 1, 2] [CLOs: 2, 3, 4]

In this discussion, we’ll continue to build an argument that is appropriate for the rhetorical situation. Through this discussion, you will consider the opinions, assumptions, and biases that may impact your objectivity.

Prepare

Review the discussion grading criteria, read What Lies Beneath the Surface by Joy Meads, and watch the full video Mind Bugs | Mahzarin R. Banaji | TEDxBari (Links to an external site.) from TEDx Talks on YouTube.

Then, log on to Project Implicit (Links to an external site.) (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/) and take at least one implicit association test (IAT). There are many tests to choose from. You do not have to register or log in. You can take any test(s) as an unregistered “guest” by clicking the orange “GO!” button. Pay close attention to the instructions for each section of the IAT. The rules change!

Reflect

After learning about the IAT and taking the test online, think about your results and the explanation provided by the website. Are the results surprising to you? Do you trust the outcome of the IAT? How did you feel while taking the test and how did you feel when you received the results? Were some parts of the IAT easier than others?

Think about the possible biases, assumptions, and opinions that may be influencing your work in this class. Will Mead’s ten strategies for overcoming unconscious bias help you compose a more objective argument?

Write

Share what you learned from your IAT experience and relate it to Meads’ ten strategies for overcoming unconscious bias.

Then,
remind the class of your research question( see attachment) and share your working thesis statement (See Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.)), identify your personal opinions, experiences, assumptions, and associations with the subject of your argumentative essay, explain how you intend to overcome your biases so you can write an objective research-based argument, and share how you plan to integrate research into your rough draft this week.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services