Research Paper

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I need an explanation for this Management question to help me study.

Here is the information for the company you need to write about:

https://www.haidilao.com/en/gyhdl/index.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haidilao

Write around 30-40 pages

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: APA format

Ensure professional presentation with proper spelling, grammar, etc.

Must have proper in-text citations and bibliography page where appropriate.

Organize with sub headings.

Include page numbers.

Include a cover page or paper header.

Please make sure the following are included in your project:

1. Introduction,products, services,history

2. Introduction to the industry

3.Analysis of external environment, how it affects industry and your company.

4. Porter Five forces analysis

5. Core competences, competitive advantage

6.Value Chain Analysis

7. International Strategy

8. Competitor analysis

9. Financial Analysis

10. Corporate Governance

11. Role of technology.

12 Strategy going forward

13.Conclusions/thoughts

14 Recommendationshistory final essay: nursing case study help
Need help with my History question – I’m studying for my class.

All citations must be properly formatted in the Chicago/Turabian style.
Essay Prompt
Reflect on the central themes in this course: (1) development of American capitalism, (2) expansion of citizenship and civil rights, (3) Native American self-determination, and (4) political realignments. Select one of these themes, and use it as analytical frame to narrate change over time in the United States from 1868 to 2020.

Once you have identified a key theme you want to narrate, write an essay that explains to people living in 1868 how the country will change in the next 150 years. Remember, your target audience has no knowledge of the future world and therefore you cannot take any knowledge for granted. You will need to explain change over time in such a way that your 1868 audience will understand your narrative, and be so historically accurate that anyone who discovers your essay in 2020 will be convinced that you are a time traveller in need of rescue rather than an elaborate hoax.
Essay Structure
Introduction (150-250 words)
Define which course theme you will use an analytical lens for your essay: (1) development of American capitalism, (2) expansion of citizenship and civil rights, (3) Native American self-determination, and (4) political realignments Explain how your framing organizes historical events, key actors, and historical change over time. Make an argument about how and why the United States changed between 1868 and 2020.
Interpretive Historical Narrative (500-1000 words)
Interpret ten (10) ID terms in the body of your essay through the analytical frame you developed in your introduction. These key terms can be found on the title slide for each lecture. Integrate quotations or paraphrased evidence from five (5) of your classmates document labs posted throughout the quarter. Provide a full citation for each of these peer resources. Use a bold font each time you deploy an ID term, and provide a full citation for the lecture from which it came. Demonstrate your mastery of course content by contextualizing ID terms (who, what, when, where, and why should we care) and explaining how they illustrate your interpretive frame in act. Avoid stringing together a loose assortment of ID definitions like a grade school exam unless you do not want an “A” on this assignment. Instead, cite them as evidence to support your historical interpretation. Narrate historical change over time.
Conclusion (100-250 words)
Cinch your argument with a pithy articulation of your theoretical frame or “ism,” its importance in interpreting world history between 1850-2010, how it sheds light on this dynamic period. Conclude with your own reflection on the importance of understanding the nuances of historical change over time between 1850-2010.Clean Data and Basic Analysis with R programming
I’m working on a Computer Science question and need guidance to help me study.

Using the data collected in week 1, clean the data and perform perform basic statistical analysis.
Often times data is analyzed and visualized to understand, but not to present the visualization. Visualizations can be excellent analytical tools.

If you would like to generate different data than what was gathered in week 1, you may. However, clearly state that the data is different and the source of the data in the research paper. You do not need a compelling reason, so do not spend time trying to justify your choice. You may use data that is available within the libraries of R, as well.

Determine what cleaning is needed, if any. Using statistical tools provided in the lecture, or tools you ascertained the knowledge of from another source, determine what tools to use and perform at least 2 statistical analyses on your dataset.
After completing these actions in R, write a research paper and describe:
the condition, type, and size of your data what cleaning was needed in order to prepare the data for analysis what statistical tools were used and any assumptions these tools have what were the results of the statistical analyses and what does this tell you about your data? could you see any way to discretely misrepresent your data when performing your cleaning or analysis?
The following documents should be submitted for full credit:
The research paper The .r file with your code and/or If the cleaning and statistical tests were done in the console, copy and paste the console input/output into a .txt file
Your research paper should be at least 3 pages (and at least 800 words), double-spaced, saved in MS Word format. All research papers in this course should be written in APA format, excluding the abstract. Properly cite and reference any websites or documents you include to support the requirements of this assignment.Stakeholder and Coalition Building Paper
Help me study for my Social Science class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

Submit a paper that covers the groups, individuals, and organizations that support, as well as those that oppose, the legislation that you have selected, and why.

Legislation: Welfare Reform Act of 1996

Organization: Department of Social Services opposes it.

APA

FULL directions attached, there are 4 bullet points of questions in the directions

Bullet d.– The Department of Social Services wants to make the act more diverse. I will attach my position paper so you know what changes the department wants to make!!! VERY IMPORTANT PART!!!Task 4: Certification and Accreditations: nursing assignment help
I’m studying and need help with a Computer Science question to help me learn.

Scenario
You have been hired to review a conducted risk assessment for the Healthy Body Wellness Center since information security management systems should be regularly reviewed, updated, and maintained. To prepare for an upcoming audit and accreditation review, you will use current guidelines from ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, or ITIL (e.g., NIST Special Publication 800-37, Guide for Applying the Risk Management Framework to Federal Information Systems: A Security Life Cycle Approach) and the attached “Healthy Body Wellness Center Risk Assessment” case study.

You will apply the current guidelines to the risk management framework for the Healthy Body Wellness Center’s information systems. The organization has recently had a risk assessment completed that includes recommendations for implementing security controls and mitigating risks. In your new role, a team of people will be assigned to help you with the task. You are tasked with creating a to-do list by completing the “Task 4 RMF To-Do List” attachment for the specific tasks outlined in each of the six steps in the risk management framework (RMF). The first row of the “Task 4 RMF To-Do List” has been completed for you. You will then evaluate and create a document that compares the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL standards with regard to the certification and accreditation process.

Assumptions

Requirements
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

A. Complete the attached “Task 4 RMF To-Do List” by using the attached “Task 4 Healthy Body Wellness Center Risk Assessment” and doing the following:1. Identify whether the tasks are done or not done based on the attached “Task 4 Healthy Body Wellness Center Risk Assessment”.2. Discuss how you determined the status of the tasks if they are done, and include the page numbers from the risk assessment to support that discussion; or, if the tasks are not done, provide recommendations for completing the tasks in compliance with current guidelines from ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, or ITIL, including where the results should be saved.3. List the external documents needed for each task that is not done.

B. Compare the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks by creating a document in which you do the following:1. Discuss how each framework is most commonly used.2. Analyze the purpose of each framework design.3. Compare the strengths of each framework.4. Compare the weaknesses of each framework.5. Discuss the certification and accreditation process for each framework.6. Explain which type of business each framework applies to according to the certification and accreditation process.

C. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

File Restrictions

File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )File size limit: 200 MBFile types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

Rubric
A1
:
Task Statuses

Not Evident

The status of each task in the “Task 4 RMF To-Do List” attachment is not indicated.

Approaching Competence

The status of each task in the “Task 4 RMF To-Do List” attachment is not correct based on the risk assessment.

Competent

The status of each task in the “Task 4 RMF To-Do List” attachment is correct based on the risk assessment.

A2:Discussion of Statuses

Not Evident

A discussion is not provided, or, for tasks that are done, the discussion does not provide how the status of each task was determined. Page numbers from the risk assessment are not provided for each task that is done. Or, for tasks that are not done, the response does not include a recommendation for completing each task.

Approaching Competence

For tasks that are done, the discussion provides information about how the status of each task was determined, but the discussion is not based on the risk assessment or does not include correct page numbers from the risk assessment to support that discussion for each task. Or, for tasks that are not done, the response includes a recommendation for completing each task, but the recommendations are not in compliance with ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, or ITIL. For tasks that are not done, the location where the results should be saved is not provided for each task.

Competent

For tasks that are done, the discussion provides how the status of each task was determined based on the risk assessment and includes page numbers from the risk assessment to support that discussion for each task. Or, for tasks that are not done, the response includes a recommendation for completing each task in compliance with ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, or ITIL. For tasks that are not done, the location where the results should be saved is provided for each task.

A3:External Documents

Not Evident

External documents are not listed for each task that is not done.

Approaching Competence

External documents are listed for tasks that are not done, but 1 or more of the documents are inappropriate.

Competent

External documents are listed for tasks that are not done, and all of the documents are appropriate.

B1:Framework Use

Not Evident

A discussion is not provided, or the submission does not discuss how the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL framework is used.

Approaching Competence

A discussion of the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks is provided, but the discussion for at least 1 framework does not accurately describe how it is most commonly used.

Competent

A discussion of the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks is provided, and the discussion accurately describes how each framework is most commonly used.

B2:Framework Purpose

Not Evident

A submission is not provided, or the submission does not attempt to describe the purpose of the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL framework designs.

Approaching Competence

The submission describes the reasons for the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL framework designs but does not analyze the purpose of the design by explaining how each framework design is suited to its use.

Competent

The submission analyzes the purpose of the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks by explaining how each framework design is suited to its use.

B3:Framework Strength

Not Evident

A submission is not provided, or the submission does not compare the strengths of the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks.

Approaching Competence

The submission does not accurately compare the strengths of the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks.

Competent

The submission accurately compares the strengths of the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks.

B4:Framework Weakness

Not Evident

A submission is not provided, or the submission does not compare the weaknesses of the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks.

Approaching Competence

The submission does not accurately compare the weaknesses of the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks.

Competent

The submission accurately compares the weaknesses of the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks.

B5:Certification and Accreditation

Not Evident

A discussion is not provided, or the submission does not discuss the certification and accreditation process for the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks.

Approaching Competence

The submission inaccurately discusses the certification and accreditation process for the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks.

Competent

The submission accurately discusses the certification and accreditation process for each of the ISO 27002, COBIT, NIST, and ITIL frameworks.

B6:Framework Choice

Not Evident

An explanation is not provided, or the response does not attempt to explain which type of business each framework applies to.

Approaching Competence

The response explains which type of business each framework applies to, but the response is irrelevant to the certification and accreditation process.

Competent

The response explains which type of business each framework applies to according to the certification and accreditation process.

C:Sources

Not Evident

The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

Approaching Competence

The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized, and a reference list; however, the citations and/or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.

Competent

The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.

D:Professional Communication

Not Evident

Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.

Approaching Competence

Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.

Competent

Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services