Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
I’m stuck on a Psychology question and need an explanation.
REFLECTION
Based on the previous weeks, in your own words, summarize the steps you must take to code using the CPT manual. Then, share the requirements for E/M coding and identify the most commonly used codes. Please support your answer.
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
The digestive system includes procedures involving the lips, mouth, tongue, palate and uvula, salivary glands and ducts, pharynx, adenoids and tonsils, esophagus, stomach, intestines, appendix, rectum, biliary tract, abdomen, peritoneum and omentum. As you can see the digestive system covers a wide range of anatomy. It is important to understand the types of procedures performed on this section of CPT.
Review the YouTube Video: Medical Coding for Hernia Repairs
EQ: Describe the documentation you would need to see in the medical record in order to code hernia repairs accuratelyCPSS405 Working with Sex Offenders Wk 2 – Types of Offenders: nursing homework help
I don’t understand this Social Science question and need help to study.
Assignment Content
Locate current crime statistics in your area for one of the offenses:
Contact offense against child Non-contact offense against a child Contact offense against an adult Non-contact offense against an adult
Write a 525- to 700-word paper on the specific type of offense.
Include the following:
Research this type of offense. What are the typical motivators for the offender? Describe the characteristics of offenders who typically commit the selected offense. Describe the victim’s profile (as connected to an offender’s victim pool). Include common reactions of a victim related to a sexual offense. Describe the different types of laws related to the selected offense and how the offense is normally prosecuted. Describe the effectiveness of statutes and laws in reducing the occurrence of sex crimes.
Include a minimum 2 sources.
Format any citations in your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Creating a Shadow and Moving Background Elements Forward
I need an explanation for this Art & Design question to help me study.
Pick 2 of your own images or 2 images from online to create a believable composite. You must see the bottom of the thing you are compositing, so it will require a shadow. Choose an image where you can move part of the background in front of the thing you are compositing. Make sure you use masks when creating your composite. Create your selection using Select and Mask. Refine the mask as needed using the brush tool. Create your shadow as described in the video and packet. Move part of the background in front of the object you are compositing as directed in the packet and video. Name all your layers descriptively. When you are done, save as a psd. use these techniques Shadow 1-Cast Shadow, Shadow 2: Altering the shadow’s color, Shadow 3: Contact Shadow, Fine Tuning Mask: Decontaminate Colors, Fine Tuning the Composite, Moving Background Elements Forward
Very easy to do!!!!!AMH2020 Analytical paper
I’m trying to learn for my History class and I’m stuck. Can you help?
Write a 750-word response to the following prompt:
The idea of “freedom” was central to the culture, politics, economics, and society of the United States between 1865 and 1918. Throughout this period, however, the meaning of freedom was constantly debated, contested, and negotiated.
Choose three different individuals/groups that we have discussed in the first third of this course (modules 1-4). Explain how each of them defined, explained, and used the concept of freedom. You should also compare these contrasting views of freedom. What were the points of agreement and disagreement? Could these multiple definitions of freedom coexist, or were they mutually exclusive? What did “freedom” mean for these people? Did freedom for some groups necessarily mean a lack of freedom for others? Why?
Be sure to define the term “freedom” in your answer.
Instructions:
Your answer must quote and cite at least three different documents from the required reading for Modules 1 through 4. Be as specific as possible, and be sure to use the assigned readings to defend your answer. Answers that are too short or too long (more than 50 words in either direction) will lose points. Your answer will be checked for plagiarism using Turn-It-In. Your answer should be based on material covered in class lectures and in the assigned reading for this course. DO NOT CONSULT OTHER SOURCES. I do not want to know what Google tells you about this topic. All the information you need to answer this question can be found in the assigned reading and in your class notes.
Some tips on formatting and length:
750 words is not much! It’s about three double spaced pages (1” margins, 12 point font). Be brief, especially in your introductory paragraph. Get right to your argument, don’t waste words describing everything we’ve covered in the course. There’s no need to make sweeping statements like “Since the beginning of U.S. history….” The prompt asks several different (but closely related) questions. You do not need to answer each and every one of them, but you should try to address most of them (at least in passing) in your essay. Suggested format:
75 words: Introductory paragraph that ends with a clear thesis statement (that is, your argument and your answer to the question asked in the prompt). 200 words: body paragraph 1, which should contain your first example and a quotation from your first document. 200 words: body paragraph 2, which should contain your second example and a quotation from your second document. A transition paragraph between paragraphs should address the similarities/differences between your first and second example. 200 words: body paragraph 3, which should contain your third example and a quotation from your third document. A transition paragraph between paragraphs should address the similarities/differences between this example and your first two examples. 75 words: a concluding paragraph that compares your three examples and reiterates (not word-for-word!) your thesis from the introduction.
You MUST introduce and contextualize your quotes. We’ve read dozens of documents this term. You must tell your reader what document you’re quoting.
GOOD: Southern African Americans had their own definition of freedom. “We claim freedom as our natural right,” black residents of Nashville stated in a petition, “and ask that in harmony and co-operation with the nation at large, you should cut up the roots the system of slavery.” As these petitioners noted, the work of freedom remained incomplete, even after emancipation. BAD: Southern African Americans had their own definition of freedom. “We claim freedom as our natural right, and ask that in harmony and co-operation with the nation at large, you should cut up the roots the system of slavery.” The second example is extraordinarily confusing for your reader. Who are you quoting? Are these your words? Introduce your quotes, and then explain them in your own words.
You should also try to avoid extended quotations. In almost all circumstances, you shouldn’t be quoting more than one or two sentences at a time. When you’re trying to quote a longer passage, intersperse your own words as necessary. When I see paragraph-length citations I start to worry that you’re just trying to fill up space…
Historians use Chicago Manual of Style, Humanities format. Use footnotes, not parenthetical/in-text citations.
Cite the documents from Eric Foner’s Voices of Freedom as follows:
Elizabeth Cady Stanton, “Home Life,” in Eric Foner, ed. Voices of Freedom, Vol. 2, 6th Edition (New York: W.W. Norton, 2020), 14-17.
I have a PDF copy of the book “voices of freedom” if you need it.How is the Texas Constitution changed? Texas Constitution are proposed by the state legislature, but can only be approved by a majority vote in a statewide election.: assignment help online
I’m working on a Political Science question and need guidance to help me study.
I need a 2 paged essay that answers these questions about Texas Constitution. Depending on the text below.
1. How this got to on the ballot (Talk a little about H.J.R. 72 and its progress through the House and Senate).
2. What it was designed to do.
3. Who seemed to be in favor and against.
4. What potential problems could this create, if any?
5. How would you have voted on this if you had been a state legislator?
6. How did you vote (or how would you have voted) on this as a voter?
7. What did voters decide about the proposal, and why do you think they made that decision?
Changes to the Texas Constitution are proposed by the state legislature, but can only be approved by a majority vote in a statewide election. In 2017, voters adopted all seven amendments proposed by the state legislature.
In 2019, legislators proposed ten amendments for voter consideration last month. The first one, Proposition 1, attempted to solve a problem for some small Texas towns that have trouble finding anybody to serve as municipal court judge.
The Texas Constitution (Article 16, Sec. 20) generally prohibits a person from holding more than one paid public office at the same time – which seems like a good idea. There is a list of exceptions for certain offices such as notary public (which, technically, is an appointed state office), as well as for members of the military and the reserves, etc. A few years ago, they added an exception for appointed municipal court judges in small towns where there may not be many lawyers willing to serve. This exception would allow one person to serve as a municipal court judge in several nearby small towns – probably just conducting traffic court for an hour or two every couple of weeks in each town.
Some cities, however, elect their municipal court judges, and those elected judges are not covered by this exception. This year, legislators unanimously approved H.J.R. (“House Joint Resolution”) 72, to extend the more-than-one-city exception to elected municipal court judges.
