Reflection

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I need an explanation for this English question to help me study.

You’re just about to turn in your AP, now it’s time to think about everything you’ve learned and accomplished this quarter as we head into the final ePortfolio. Let’s take some time to reflect on your progress so far. Answer the following questions, keeping in mind how this metacognitive approach (writing about your own writing) will serve your final ePortfolio introduction.

1. First, describe your process: research, drafting, peer review, revision. What did you do differently the second time around (AP vs. HCP)? What would you change if you could go back and start over? What would you do the same? What do you anticipate doing differently or similarly as you move toward assembling the ePortfolio?

2. Which assignments were most useful to you as you completed the AP? What was most helpful about them? Keep in mind that you may use these (assignments, lectures, peer review, in-class exercises, etc.) as artifacts in your ePortfolio. And hey, while you’re thinking about them, why not build or add them to an “Artifacts” folder in your ePortfolio right now?Jury discussion
Can you help me understand this Business Law question?

You’re On the Jury: The Case of the Offer too Good to Be True

Sam Smith, by mistake, opened up a letter with his neighbor’s address on the front but left in his mailbox. The letter, from a major automobile manufacturer, read as follow: “Dear Mr. Jones or Occupant: We offer to sell you one of our deluxe luxury automobiles for $100.00*. Use the enclosed card to indicate your acceptance and return it to us together with your check in the amount of $100.00”. The asterisk was printed on the reverse of the letter next to the following language: “*provided you are the winner in a drawing to be held in one month. Your check will only be cashed on winning.”

Sam never saw the language on the reverse side. He returned the acceptance card together with his check and never received the deluxe luxury car. His check was never returned to him but neither was it cashed. He sued the car manufacturer for breach of contact.

The Trial

During the trial, the manufacturer’s representative explained that this type of advertising had been used for many years by many different types of companies and that everyone knew that this type of offer was limited and usually dependent on a person being selected in a drawing. He explained that the offer had been sent out to a limited number of people, chosen because of their prior ownership of the manufacturer’s vehicles. He introduced in evidence a copy of the letter, showing that all the details of the offer had been printed in large-size type. Sam explained that even though the letter was not meant for him, there was no name at the top of the letter, and he assumed the offer was meant for the general public. He stated further that he never looked at the reverse of the letter because the offer on the front was clear.

The Arguments at Trial

The manufacturer’s attorneys argued that an offer was never made to Sam, only to his neighbor, and thus Sam could not have accepted the offer. Also, the offer was not made to the general public but to a limited group, and thus the offer could only be accepted by a member of that group. They argued further that the offer and qualifying statement were in clear language and printed in large-size type so that a potential buyer would understand the nature of the offer. Sam’s attorney argued that because a name did not appear at the top of the offer, the offer should be considered as having been made to the general public, and therefore Sam had a right to accept the offer. She further argued that the qualifying statement should have been printed on the front of the letter and not on the reverse side where it might not be read. She claimed that a valid offer had been made and that the offer had been accepted properly by Sam.

Questions to Discuss
If you were the judge or jury deciding this case, for whom would you decide? Why? Would your answers to any of these questions be different if the neighbor’s name and address had been printed at the top of the letter or if the qualifying statement had been printed at the bottom of the first page of the letter? Why? What remedies should be awarded to the prevailing party? Why?Treating Substance Abuse: nursing case study help
Can you help me understand this Law question?

Introduction
According to a 2010 report by CASAColumbia (CASA) at Columbia University, 65 percent of all incarcerated people meet the criteria for a substance use disorder, yet only 11 percent of them get any treatment. Correctional agencies are actively seeking to close the gap in state in federal prisons between offender need for addiction treatment and program availability.

As you discovered in your unit readings on this subject, all is not lost. Correctional agencies and drug courts are considering new ways to implement substance abuse treatment programs and looking at improved therapies and treatment modalities. Tragically, the opioid epidemic has helped advance this conversation as public health officials, law enforcement, and the treatment community across the country seek funding to support nationwide programs to address these urgent problems.
Instructions
For this discussion, respond to the following:
Compare and contrast pharmacological and cognitive-behavioral treatment approaches to the problem of substance abuse. Explain how the continuity of care perspective and interagency collaboration makes sense on theoretical grounds in the treatment of substance abuse. Discuss the effect of aftercare on offenders released into their communities.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services