Read This Article And Respond To The Following Questions.

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I don’t understand this Psychology question and need help to study.

To start, read this short article on using the self-reference effect (Links to an external site.) to help learn algebra. After reading the article, respond to the following items in a written response.
What do you think about the use of the “self-reference effect” to make difficult concepts easier to grasp? Do you believe that this would help students learn the material better? Explain why or why not. The author suggests creating mnemonic devices using the names of friends and family members as a way to use the self-reference effect to students’ advantages when learning difficult subject matter. Can you think of any other ways to use the self-reference effect in a classroom (not necessarily related to math)? Apply any of the other concepts that you have learned about in the chapter on the social self (Links to an external site.) to this situation? Identify at least one other concept or effect (other than the ones discussed by the blog author) from the chapter that could be used to help instructors teach certain hard-to-grasp concepts more effectively. Make sure to explain why you believe this would work.

To earn full credit, your response paper must show evidence of reading the article, independent thought on the topic, and critical thinking skills. Make sure to proofread your assignment for content and clarity before submitting it. Although content matters more than length, assignments should be roughly 2-3 typed pages, assuming regular 12 pt font size, spacing, and margins.one page post and reply: nursing essay help
I’m studying for my English class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

as least one page :

Reading 2 – Clark. Misery and Company: Sympathy in Everyday Life

The reading offers a glimpse at the social rules of sympathy. The author provides definitions and discusses various rules of sympathy. What are the rules of sympathy in the American culture? Do you agree with them?

To make the analysis slightly more concrete, we will think of some hypothetical cases by adhering to some of her concepts. One of the rules of sympathy is that we must not claim too much sympathy; a corollary rule is that we must not claim sympathy for too long, either. Think of the following situations. Who deserves sympathy for the longest period of time? Who deserves sympathy for the next longest period of time, and so forth? In other words, reorder the scenarios from highest (1) to lowest (7), in terms of how long the “sympathizee” would deserve your sympathy (for example, if you know someone who broke a leg, lost a parent, broke up with his/her significant other etc., how much sympathy would they get from you).
Breaking a leg and having to stay on a cast and crutches for 6 months Having to take a really hard sociology class from a professor who according to rumors is really mean Having a parent die when you are only 20 years old Having a parent die when you are 55 years old Being dumped by your boy/girlfriend after dating them for 3-4 years Flunking out of college Being expelled from college after being caught cheating
Now, think of the following questions.
What factors did you take into account when ordering your list? Is it possible for someone to receive sympathy indefinitely or for someone to offer sympathy indefinitely? Do you think there are gender differences when offering or receiving sympathy?

please write at least 200 words for reply:

In some societies and places, such as the Iks in Central Africa, individuals do not show sympathy and simply only worries about themselves. In other societies and places, such as Americans in the United States, sympathy is part of the social life and culture which means individuals show, receive, and feel sympathy. One realization is that feelings and emotions shape the social structure of a society. (Clark 103-104)

American’s have created rules which have been handed down from generation to generation called common sense. According to Candance Clark, “[s]ympathy is a crucial emotion that provides glue for social bonds, the building blocks of society” (Clark 103). The first rule of sympathy in American culture is to not make a false claim to sympathy which means do not make a false accusation, or a lie, of hardship to receive sympathy to benefit yourself. By doing this, others lose trust in you. An example of this is a tale of the boy who cried wolf. A boy always wanted sympathy from those around him so he lied that a wolf was threatening him. Until one day when the event actually happened, the individuals surrounding the boy had no sympathy for him due to his previous experiences. The second rule in American culture is to not claim too much sympathy which means when individuals actually have a reason to be sympathized, they should not gain sympathy for too much time, too often, or want too much of it. This could lead others to not feel bad for you. The way one reacts, speaks, choice of wording, and tone helps others determine when to give or receive sympathy but also the personality of the individual. The third rule in American culture is that one has to claim some sympathy. If you do not claim some sympathy then you can be looked at as too self-centered or too successful in your circumstances such as everything good happens to you or you do not have anything bad in your life. (Clark 104-108)

When reviewing the rules of American culture, I have thought about my own experiences and feelings with the rules of sympathy. I agree with the first rule. Unfortunately, people often crave attention to be give sympathy which is seen a lot today on social media. However, when something bad does happen to the individual, people are less likely to reach out to the person, give sympathy or assistance, and things of that matter. I agree and do not agree with the second rule. I agree that if one has a reason to claim sympathy that they should but dragging the situation out can be repetitive and others can build a tolerance in a way to your situation. However, I do not agree with this rule because if an individual is in a situation, such as losing a parent, a lifelong effecting event, difficult things may come up which triggers this event in which sympathy should be given when it is needed to support the individual. I do agree with the third rule. If one does not accept when others is giving sympathy to them, they often are seen as stubborn, selfish, have an attitude and are better than everyone else. Verbal and non-verbal signals can help one determine if one is accepting or denying the sympathy given to them and determines their personality or way of life.

Clark, C., 1998. Misery And Company: Sympathy In Everyday Life. University of Chicago Press, pp.103-108.

Who deserves sympathy for the longest amount of time? (1 is the highest and 7 is the lowest)
Breaking a leg and having to stay on a cast and crutches for 6 months (4) Having to take a really hard sociology class from a professor who according to rumors is really mean (6) Having a parent die when you are only 20 years old (1) Having a parent die when you are 55 years old (2) Being dumped by your boy/girlfriend after dating them for 3-4 years (3) Flunking out of college (%) Being expelled from college after being caught cheating (7)
As I reviewed the situations and ordered how long I would give someone sympathy to, I realized that these answers will be different to everyone based on their feelings and personal experiences. I personally put myself in each situation as if I had a friend who (enter situation here) and then asked myself how “bad” would I feel for them and how much sympathy would I give to them? Based on my personal experiences, beliefs, feelings, etc, I ordered the situations from how much sympathy I would give to someone. I would give the most amount of sympathy to an individual who has a parent pass away when they are twenty years old and I would give the least amount of sympathy to someone who was expelled from college after being caught cheating. I do think it is possible for someone to receive or offer sympathy for an indefinite amount of time. We, humans, often do not give sympathy indefinitely due to patience and tolerance but I do think it is possible. I think it depends on each individual’s personality and situation. I think their may be some gender differences with sympathy due to cultural beliefs but I do not think that their should be a large difference. Often men are supposed to be tough so if they give or receive sympathy they may not be seen as tough. However, I feel that no matter your gender, giving and receiving sympathy is being kind.Justice in the Western
Need help with my History question – I’m studying for my class.

Read Leviticus 6:1 – 7:38, and 10. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/

Post on Blackboard how the trial in Leviticus, chapter 10 can be used to better understand what justice meant in the period of exile for the Israelites. Who possessed power in this context, and whose power was being controlled? Which group of people posed the greatest threat to the structure of this religious group if they chose not to strictly obey the rules set down in the Torah?

Read Genesis 22: 1-19, the story of Abraham and Isaac. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/

Listen: Leonard Cohen, Song of Isaac: https://youtu.be/-y36zbbuX7w

Are there competing definitions of justice in the Genesis story or is there only one? How does the definition of justice in this story reflect the principles from Leviticus? What is the relationship in this story between obedience and justice? Taken together, what is the role of submission in defining justice in the Torah? Is submission to a god/gods’ laws the same as submission to laws people accept as having been written by other people? How does Leonard Cohen’s song make you think differently about the parable of Isaac?

Original post should be 500 words and be constructed like a short essay. Use the prompts to help you develop a thesis statement. Use evidence from the assigned source to help support your assertions. No conclusions are necessary in original posts. To earn the full points for the post, you must substantively respond to one colleagues’ post. At least 150 words is a meaningful response length.M1.2 That Would Never Happen Today! Would It?
Help me study for my Psychology class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

I will attached the activity

Part 1

ACTIVITY INSTRUCTIONS

After going through the materials above, identify an experiment that has been conducted in your field of study; it does not matter how recent it was. Provide a short summary of the experiment, including what was unethical and what was gained from the research.
Based on the basic ethical principles in the Belmont Report, what would you recommend changing in this study to bring it up to today’s ethical standards? Would making these changes impact the knowledge gained? Why or why not?
Part 2
Protecting Your Research Participants
The ethics information covered in your text was from the viewpoint of a Principal investigator (i.e., the researcher responsible for the study). However, not everyone serves as a Principal investigator (PI); there are other roles individuals can play in research. One specific example is a large research projects where the PI hires individuals to help in the data collection, analysis, and reporting. There are various ethical scenarios that can arise during data collection, analysis, and reporting. The video above covers three different scenarios and what should be done when faced with one of these situations.

Now that you know the importance of protecting the rights and welfare of Human Research Participants and that it is mandatory for every member of a research team. To engage in this interactive exercise, go to The Research Clinic (Links to an external site.)and click on “Play Full Video”. Watch the introductory video all the way to the end.

Once that video is over, you will be presented with four different characters from which you will select the clinical research coordinator, “Jan Klein, RN.” Feel free to play other parts, but for this short assignment, address the questions from the experience of this character. Take a screenshot of the final page after completing the activity.

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

After completing The Research Clinic activity:
Submit a screenshot of the final page before returning to the main menu. Choose one of the critical decision points for the coordinator. In one to two paragraphs, explain why the decision was critical to maintaining integrity based on Internal Review Board (IRB) protocol. Explain the role of informed consent, data integrity/validity, participant rights, and participant welfare.Discussion board: assignment help online
I need support with this Law question so I can learn better.

DQ1- Ethical codes guide the behavior of attorneys, police officers, and judges. Attorneys, police officers, and judges are expected to operate under the letter of the law without expressing bias or personal views during work hours. On off hours, those rules are often not as clear, yet we, as the public, still demand higher ethical standards of off-duty criminal justice personnel. Should off-duty members of the legal arena be held to a higher standard? If they are found to be in violation of those standards off duty, should they be punished to a lesser extent? Where does duty end and personal lives begin?

DQ2- Activities of law enforcement personnel are under greater scrutiny than ever before due to the fact that the public is constantly monitoring law enforcement activities with recording devices. Further, many police officers are now compelled to wear video cameras as part of their uniform. Does the constant presence of monitoring have a cooling effect on law enforcement activities? In other words, will law enforcement personnel be less willing to take aggressive but appropriate measures to combat crime if they are subject to near constant monitoring and recording? Does this create ethical dilemmas for law enforcement? Explain.

DQ3- Pretend that you are the decision maker for an administrative agency considering whether or not to allow the release of water to disgruntled ranchers at the potential cost of increasing the danger to an endangered species of fish. What ethical frameworks might help you make your decision regarding whether to release the water? Apply the chosen framework to resolve the ethical dilemma.

DQ4- Pretend that you are charged with the interrogation of suspected terrorists for an agency of American government. That agency is currently housing the suspected terrorist within a military installation located on a small island in the Atlantic Ocean. The executive administration authorized you to engage in “advanced interrogation techniques” and to even engage in what the administration has termed, torture lite. What ethical obligations might you have to consider? What legal obligations might you be required to follow?

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services