Purpose This assignment is intended to help you learn to do the following: Exami

Purpose
This assignment is intended to help you learn to do the following:
Examine the ethical and legal responsibilities of public administration professionals, including the concept of the public interest as a guide for decision-making.
Analyze an administrative scenario from multiple ethical principles and perspectives.
Create written communications that follow principles for effective professional communication.
Overview
One of the main goals of this course is to develop your ability to think and act as a professional public administrator. A professional brings certain values and skills to any job and organization that shape how he or she approaches decision-making. In order to become an effective professional, you must begin to think about the values and beliefs that will define you as a professional. One of the key manager roles is to serve as a disturbance handler.
You have already examined this real world case study that presents an ethical dilemma for a public administrator and discussed the “right” way to address it with your classmates. Now you must take those discussions and use them to derive a number of solutions to the situation and to determine which one is best.
Action Items
1. Compose a 3-5 page document consisting of a:
A case summary that:
Identifies the key actors (and explains their roles).
Highlights the key issues presented by the case.
Concludes by identifying the primary ethical dilemma and any derivative ethical dilemmas that need to be resolved.
Three distinct alternative courses of action available to Anderson that could address the primary and derivative ethical dilemmas.
A comparative analysis of the three alternatives
A recommendation as to which option is best, with appropriate justification based on appropriate decision criteria.
A discussion of how the chosen alternative should be implemented, identifying any obstacles to that implementation and suggestions for dealing with such obstacles.
An explanation of why your responses would or would not be different if this were a nonprofit organization.
2. Submit the completed first draft of your assignment. Your work will automatically be checked by Turnitin. 3. Access your Turnitin report by reviewing your Submission Details for this assignment. Revise your work as needed based on the feedback. 4. By the due date indicated, re-submit the final version of your work. Rubric
Ethical Decision Making Paper Rubric
Ethical Decision Making Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary and Analysis
Apply legal and ethical principles for administrative decision-making.
Examine similarities and differences of managing government and nonprofit organizations.
25 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
Paper includes an accurate and concise summary of the case and presents comprehensive analysis relevant to all the required sections. Paper offers sophisticated and insightful responses to the questions. Presentation thoroughly cites appropriate academic or professional resources to support its validity, accuracy, and credibility.
20 to >18.0 pts
Acceptable
Paper accurately summarizes the case and adequately address each the required sections. Paper offers a clear and credible interpretation of the relevance of the analysis to the questions. Presentation cites sufficient and applicable academic or professional resources to support its validity, accuracy, and credibility.
18 to >0 pts
Acceptable
Paper does not accurately summarize the case and/or does not adequately address each of the required sections. Paper includes analysis but it is inaccurate or underdeveloped and/or its significance or relevance to the questions is unclear. Paper cites little or no relevant academic or professional resources.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation
Create and present credible arguments using multiple media.
20 to >18.0 pts
Proficient
Paper is exceptionally well done in terms of its readability and presentation. Paper very effectively presents data visually to enhance reader understanding. Paper makes effective use of formatting, visuals, tables, graphics, etc. to make the document very reader friendly, intuitive, and easy to reference back to.
18 to >16.0 pts
Acceptable
Paper is well done in terms of its readability and presentation. Paper effectively presents data visually in a way that is helpful to the reader The paper is formatted in a manner that is reader friendly (for example, makes use of headings, subheadings, and other formatting techniques) and makes good use of visual representations (for example graphs, charts, etc.) to illustrate key information in a clear and intuitive fashion.
16 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Paper is poor in terms of its readability and presentation. Paper does not present data visually or visual presentations are poor. Paper is not formatted in a manner that is reader friendly and does not consistently follow guidelines in formatting and.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA, Grammar, & Mechanics
5 to >4.0 pts
Proficient
Paper follows APA guidelines in all areas. Paper is exceptionally well written in that it is very clear, coherent, well-structured, uses professional language; and contains no notable spelling, grammatical or other errors.
4 to >3.0 pts
Acceptable
Paper consistently follows APA guidelines for formatting and particularly for citing sources. Paper is well written in that is clear; coherent; well-structured; has few spelling, grammatical, or other errors; and uses professionally appropriate language.
3 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Paper does not consistently follow APA guidelines in formatting. Paper is not well written in that is significantly lacking in clarity, coherence, and/or has many spelling, grammatical or other errors; and/or uses professionally inappropriate language.
5 pts
Total Points: 50

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services