Prompt: What, according to Murdoch, is freedom? Is her account correct? (See esp

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Prompt: What, according to Murdoch, is freedom? Is her account correct? (See especially pp.
26ff., 35ff., 65, 97ff.
Structure of Essay: The point of an argumentative essay, unsurprisingly, is to produce arguments in favor of
some thesis. This thesis can be a positive claim (e.g. “Humans have free will”) or a
negative claim (“Humans do not have free will”). It can even be a skeptical claim (“There
is no way of knowing whether humans have free will”). Here are the components that you
will need to include in your essay:
(a) A clear thesis to be defended. Your thesis statement should address a
philosophically significant subject matter concerning which there is reasonable
disagreement. And it should be formulated in unambiguous, straightforward
terms. Be sure to underline your thesis statement and put it in the first paragraph
of your paper.
(b) At least one main argument in support of your thesis. This argument will ideally
consist of premises which logically entail or render highly probable your thesis,
and which are at least as, and hopefully more, plausible than the thesis itself. Your
thesis is the conclusion of this argument. If an argument contains a premise that is
decidedly controversial, you may need to argue for that premise as well. So, your
main argument may consist of sub-arguments for at least some of its premises. It
always helps to illustrate your central points with examples.
(c) At least two objections to your thesis and/or your arguments for it. These
objections must be cogent and strong. Since your goal is winning the truth rather
than winning a debate, you should try to think of the very best and most plausible
objections to your thesis you can come up with or discover. If those objections
weaken your credence in your thesis, that’s fine. It’s rational to lower one’s
confidence when compelling objections arise and to be uncertain when matters
are unclear. Just say so in your essay! Think of your task as that of presenting the
best possible case for a thesis rather than that of producing unshakeable
conviction in your readers or yourself. (But, of course, if you have more
confidence in the truth of an objection than your thesis, choose another thesis.)
(d) At least one response to each objection—two responses altogether. In most
cases, your response must specify which premise or set of premises is wrong in
the objection, and explain why it is wrong.
As always, I urge you to write clearly and straightforwardly—like you’re trying hard to
find the truth and to be understood by others. (Some philosophers write as though they’re
trying hard not to be understood. Please don’t emulate them.)
Finally, the structure of your essay should be clear. You should, for instance, flag
transitions with sentences like “One objection to my view is this:…” “In response to this
objection, I maintain that…”
Source: Iris Murdoch, the Sovereignty of Good (https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bu/reader.action?docID=1251054)

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services