Project 1 – Employee Handbook (IT Security) Hide Assignment Information Turnitin

By

Project 1 – Employee Handbook (IT Security)
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
Open this item from the Assignments menu to view the rubric and download the attached detailed assignment descriiption.
Due Date
Feb 1, 2022 11:59 PM
Attachments
CSIA 413 Project #1 Employee Handbook v2021.docx (56.7 KB) Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Project 1: Employee Handbook
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.
Executive Summary Excellent
Outstanding
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
Needs Significant Improvement
Missing or Unacceptable
Criterion Score
Executive Summary for the Policy Briefing Package
10 points
The Executive Summary provided an excellent summary of the policy package’s purpose and contents. Information about the case study company was well integrated into the summary. Each policy was individually introduced and clearly explained. The material was well organized and easy to read.
8.5 points
The Executive Summary provided an outstanding summary of the policy package’s purpose and contents. Information about the case study company was integrated into the summary. Each policy in the briefing package was individually introduced and briefly explained. The material was well organized and easy to read.
7 points
The Executive Summary provided an acceptable overview of the contents of the policy package. Information about the case study company was used in the summary. Each policy in the briefing package was named and briefly explained.
6 points
The Executive Summary provided an overview of the policy package. Information about the case study company was mentioned.
4 points
An executive summary was provided but lacked details as to the purpose and contents of the policy package and/or was not well supported by information drawn from authoritative sources.
0 points
No work submitted.
Score of Executive Summary for the Policy Briefing Package,/ 10
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.
Acceptable Use Policy Excellent
Outstanding
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
Needs Significant Improvement
Missing or Unacceptable
Criterion Score
Policy Introduction
10 points
The Acceptable Use Policy contained an excellent introduction which addressed five or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments and addressed the reasons why employees must comply with this policy. Compliance requirements are addressed and contact information is provided for questions about the policy.
8.5 points
The Acceptable Use Policy contained an outstanding introduction which addressed three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments and addressed the reasons why employees must comply with this policy. Compliance requirements are addressed and contact information is provided for questions about the policy.
7 points
The introduction for the Acceptable Use Policy was customized for the case study company. Three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments were incorporated into the policy. Compliance requirements were addressed.
6 points
The introduction to the Acceptable Use Policy mentions the case study company and compliance requirements.
4 points
The Acceptable Use Policy was built from a sample template or list of “recommended” AUP contents without customization for the case study company. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
0 points
No work submitted.
Score of Policy Introduction,/ 10
Policy Content
20 points
The Acceptable Use Policy was well organized (including 5 or more section headings for topics) and easy to understand. The policy addressed 15 or more employee responsibilities (15 or more separate policy statements) including all topics listed in the assignment.
18 points
The Acceptable Use Policy was well organized (including 3 or more section headings for topics) and easy to understand. The policy addressed 12 or more employee responsibilities (12 or more separate policy statements) including all topics listed in the assignment.
16 points
The Acceptable Use Policy was well organized and easy to understand. The policy addressed 10 or more employee responsibilities (as separate policy statements) including at least 7 items listed in the assignment.
14 points
Organization and appearance need improvement. The policy addressed least 7 items listed in the assignment (as separate policy statements).
10 points
The Acceptable Use Policy was disorganized and difficult to understand. OR, the policy was significantly lacking in content (7 or fewer policy statements). (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
0 points
No work submitted.
Score of Policy Content,/ 20
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.
Work From Home (WFH) Policy Excellent
Outstanding
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
Needs Significant Improvement
Missing or Unacceptable
Criterion Score
Policy Introduction
10 points
The WFH Policy contained an excellent introduction which addressed three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments and addressed the reasons why employees must comply with this policy. Compliance requirements are addressed and contact information is provided for questions about the policy.
8.5 points
The WFH Policy contained an outstanding introduction which addressed two or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments and addressed the reasons why employees must comply with this policy. Compliance requirements are addressed and contact information is provided for questions about the policy.
7 points
The introduction for the WFH Policy was customized for the case study company. One or more specific characteristics of the company’s business, legal & regulatory, and/or enterprise IT environments were incorporated into the policy. Compliance requirements were addressed.
6 points
The introduction to the WFH Policy mentions the case study company and compliance requirements.
4 points
The WFH Policy was built from a sample template or list of “recommended” WFH contents without customization for the case study company. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
0 points
No work submitted.
Score of Policy Introduction,/ 10
Policy Content
15 points
The WFH Policy was well organized (including 3 or more section headings for topics) and easy to understand. The policy addressed 10 or more employee responsibilities (10 or more separate policy statements) including all topics listed in the assignment.
13.5 points
The WFH Policy was well organized (including at least 3 section headings for topics) and easy to understand. The policy addressed 7 or more employee responsibilities (7 or more separate policy statements) including all topics listed in the assignment.
12 points
The WFH Policy was well organized and easy to understand. The policy addressed 5 or more employee responsibilities (5 or more separate policy statements) including at least 3 topics listed in the assignment.
9 points
Organization and appearance need improvement. The WFH policy addressed at least 3 items listed in the assignment (as separate policy statements).
6 points
The WFH Policy was disorganized and difficult to understand. OR, the policy was significantly lacking in content (fewer than 3 specific policy statements). (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
0 points
No work submitted.
Score of Policy Content,/ 15
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.
Digital Media Sanitization, Reuse, & Destruction Policy Excellent
Outstanding
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
Needs Significant Improvement
Missing or Unacceptable
Criterion Score
Policy Introduction
5 points
The media sanitization, reuse, and destruction policy contained an excellent introduction which addressed five or more specific characteristics of the company’s business and/or legal & regulatory environments which impose requirements for this policy. Compliance requirements are addressed and contact information is provided for questions about the policy.
4 points
The media sanitization, reuse, and destruction policy contained an outstanding introduction which addressed three or more specific characteristics of the company’s business and/or legal & regulatory environments which impose requirements for this policy. Compliance requirements are addressed and contact information is provided for questions about the policy.
3 points
The media sanitization, reuse, and destruction policy contained an acceptable introduction which mentioned the company’s business and/or legal & regulatory environments as a source of requirements for this policy. Compliance requirements are addressed and contact information is provided for questions about the policy.
2 points
The media sanitization, reuse, and destruction policy contained an introduction which mentioned the reasons why this policy exists and why employees must comply with it.
1 point
The policy was built from a template or list of “best practices” with no customization for the case study company. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
0 points
No work submitted.
Score of Policy Introduction,/ 5
Policy Content
10 points
The media sanitization, reuse, and destruction policy was well organized (including 3 or more section headings for topics) and easy to understand. The policy addressed all three functions (sanitization, reuse, and destruction) and included 9 or more separate policy statements.
8.5 points
The media sanitization, reuse, and destruction policy was well organized (including 3 or more section headings for topics) and easy to understand. The policy addressed all three functions (sanitization, reuse, and destruction) and included 7 or more separate policy statements.
7 points
The media sanitization, reuse, and destruction policy was well organized and easy to understand. The policy addressed all three functions (sanitization, reuse, and destruction) and included 5 or more separate policy statements.
6 points
The media sanitization, reuse, and destruction policy addressed at least two of the three functions (sanitization, reuse, and destruction) and included 3 or more separate policy statements.
4 points
The policy addressed employee responsibilities for erasure and destruction of media but lacked important details / information. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.)
0 points
No work submitted.
Score of Policy Content,/ 10
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.
Professionalism Excellent
Outstanding
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
Needs Significant Improvement
Missing or Unacceptable
Criterion Score
Addressed security issues using standard terms (e.g. confidentiality, integrity, availability, non-repudiation, authenticity, accountability, auditability, etc.).
5 points
Demonstrated excellence in the use of standard cybersecurity terminology to support discussion of security issues. Appropriately used 5 or more standard terms.
4 points
Discussion showed an outstanding understanding and integration of standard cybersecurity terminology to support discussion of security issues. Appropriately used 4 or more standard terms.
3 points
Correctly used standard cybersecurity terminology to support discussion of security issues. Appropriately used 3 or more standard terms.
2 points
Correctly used standard cybersecurity terminology to support discussion of security issues. Appropriately used 2 or more standard terms.
1 point
Attempted to use standard cybersecurity terminology to support discussion of security issues.
0 points
Did not integrate standard cybersecurity terminology into the discussion OR misused or incorrectly defined standard cybersecurity terms.
Score of Addressed security issues using standard terms (e.g. confidentiality, integrity, availability, non-repudiation, authenticity, accountability, auditability, etc.).,/ 5
Organization & Appearance
5 points
Submitted work shows outstanding organization and the use of color, fonts, titles, headings and sub-headings, etc. is appropriate to the assignment type.
4 points
Submitted work has minor style or formatting flaws but still presents a professional appearance. Submitted work is well organized and appropriately uses color, fonts, and section headings (per the assignment’s directions).
3 points
Organization and/or appearance of submitted work could be improved through better use of fonts, color, titles, headings, etc. OR Submitted work has multiple style or formatting errors. Professional appearance could be improved.
2 points
Submitted work has multiple style or formatting errors. Organization and professional appearance need substantial improvement.
1 point
Submitted work meets minimum requirements but has major style and formatting errors. Work is disorganized and needs to be rewritten for readability and professional appearance.
0 points
Submitted work is poorly organized and formatted. Writing and presentation are lacking in professional style and appearance. Work does not reflect college level writing skills. Or, no submission.
Score of Organization & Appearance,/ 5
Execution
10 points
No word usage, grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. All quotations (copied text) are properly marked and cited using a professional format (APA format recommended but not required.)
8.5 points
Work contains minor errors in word usage,grammar, spelling or punctuation which do not significantly impact professional appearance. All quotations (copied text) are properly marked and cited using a professional format (APA format recommended but not required.)
7 points
Errors in word usage, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which detract from professional appearance of the submitted work. All quotations (copied text) are properly marked and cited using a professional format (APA format recommended but not required.)
6 points
Submitted work has numerous errors in word usage, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which detract from readability and professional appearance. Punctuation errors may include failure to properly mark quoted or copied material (an attempt to name original source is required).
4 points
Submitted work is difficult to read / understand and has significant errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, punctuation, or word usage. Significant errors in presentation of copied text (lacks proper punctuation and failed to attribute material to original source).
0 points
No work submitted. OR, work contains significant instances of cut-and-paste without proper citing / attribution to the original work or author.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services