Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
Question Description
NR447-63089
Modules
Week 6 Assignment: Leadership Action Plan PowerPoint Slide Show (graded)
November 2019
Home
Syllabus
Announcements
Modules
Grades
Resources
Academic Support
People
VoiceThread
Bookstore
Library Guides
Media Gallery
My Media
New Webex
Surveys
Week 6 Assignment: Leadership Action Plan PowerPoint Slide Show (graded)
Due Dec 8 by11:59pm
Points200
Submittinga file upload
Leadership Action Plan
PowerPoint Slideshow Guidelines
Updated 9/2019
Purpose
The purpose of this PowerPoint presentation is to present the bestplan of action, as a leader, assigned to make a change to a problem orissue in your place of work. If you are not presently working, useinformation from your prelicensure experience or previous healthcareexperience. You will be using the Joint Commission National PatientSafety Goals to align with the problem or issue that you see in yourworkplace or most recent place of employment. You will prepare aPowerPoint presentation and share how you will meet one of the goals inyour place of work that will solve the problem or issue you haveselected.
Course Outcomes
Completion of this assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.
CO1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in theprovision of high-quality nursing care, healthcare team management, andthe oversight and accountability for care delivery in a variety ofsettings. (PO2)
CO2: Implement patient safety and quality improvement initiativeswithin the context of the interprofessional team through communicationand relationship building. (PO3)
CO3: Participate in the development and implementation of imaginative and creative strategies to enable systems to change. (PO7)
CO7: Apply leadership concepts in the development and initiation ofeffective plans for the microsystems and system-wide practiceimprovements that will improve the quality of healthcare delivery. (POs 2and 3)
CO8: Apply concepts of quality and safety using structure, processand outcome measures to identify clinical questions as the beginningprocess of changing current practice. (PO8)
Due Dates
This assignment is to be submitted by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, end of Week 6.
Points
This assignment is worth 200 points.
Directions
Develop a PowerPoint slideshow consisting of 8-15 slides. Includethe following. Title slide, written speaker notes, and Reference slide.Do not use Voice Over recordings. All information needs to be written in slides and speaker notes. No information in comment section will be graded.
You are required to complete the assignment using the productivitytools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version)for MAC. You must save the file in the “.pptx” format. A later versionof the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available toChamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.). Click on the envelope at the top of the page.
As the leader, you have identified a problem or issue related to oneof the National Patient Safety Goals 2019 created by the JointCommission that will lead to quality improvement. You will find theNational Patient Safety Goals using this link: https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/2019_HAP_NPSGs_final2.pdf. (Links to an external site.)Assessthe problem or issue. State the problem/issue and identify threerationales (reasons) that the problem exists. References are used. Scholarly articles must be published within the last 5 years, peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must provide the permalink
Review the information provided in our library on how to search for journal articles (Links to an external site.).
Review the information provided in the library on how to locate and copy a journal permalink (Links to an external site.). (Links to an external site.)
Assess the problem or issue. State the problem/issue and identifythree rationales (reasons) that the problem exists. References are used.
Determine the people who are involved in the issue and explain threereasons as to how their role will contribute to the problem or issuesolution.
Identify three solutions and discuss the purpose, cost and desired outcome.
Pick one solution to share with the director and discuss why thissolution was chosen over the others. Use a scholarly reference.
Make an action plan to share the solution with the director and staff.
Summarize issue, plan and desired outcome and purpose for quality improvement on slide.
Reflect on your learning and value of doing the assignment.
Include written speaker notes for all slides except title slide and reference slide.
Submit your PowerPoint slideshow by 11:59 p.m. MT, Sunday, end of Week 6.
Best Practices in Preparing PowerPoint Presentations
The following are best practices in preparing this presentation.
Be creative.
Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest.
Make easy to read with short bullet points and large font.
Review directions thoroughly.
Proofread prior to final submission.
Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.
Abide by the Chamberlain academic integrity policy.
Reminder
Before preparing your assignment, please review this “Crediting Sources Made Simple (Links to an external site.)”resource. This tool is intended to help you understand scholarlywriting, APA, referencing, and crediting. Please reach out to yourinstructor with any questions as you prepare your assignment.
**Academic Integrity**
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. Allstudents should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow itin all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all contentcontained is my own original work except as quoted and citedappropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on thisassignment.
Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.
NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.
Rubric
NR447_Leadership
NR447_Leadership
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle slideSlide contains pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member.
10.0ptsSlide contains all pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member
9.0ptsSlide contains most information; however, one component is missing.
8.0ptsSlide contains most information; however, two to three components are missing.
4.0ptsSlide contains some information; and more than three components are missing or slide is missing.
0.0ptsTitle slide is missing.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAn issue isdetermined based on the National Patient Safety Goals 2019 PDF and thereare facts with support from references explaining why it is an issue.References are used. Scholarly article must be published within the last5 years, peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and mustprovide the permalink.
20.0ptsAtleast three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read andare directly related to the issue selected based on the National PatientSafety Goals. References are used. Scholarly article must be publishedwithin the last 5 years, peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain libraryonly and must provide the permalink.
18.0ptsTworeasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostlyrelated to the National Patient Safety Goals. References are included.Scholarly article must be published within the last 5 years,peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must provide thepermalink.
16.0ptsOnereason is included and is logical and easy to read and are somewhatrelated to the National Patient Safety Goal. Few references are used.Scholarly article must be published within the last 5 years,peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must provide thepermalink.
8.0ptsOne reason is included but is not logical or easy to read and is not from the patient’s perspective. No references are used.
0.0ptsNo reasons given to support why the issue is a concern or issue is not a National Patient Safety Goal.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeList the people whoare involved in the issue and explain three reasons as to how their rolewill contribute to the problem or issue solution.
30.0ptsPeopleinvolved are listed and three reasons are included. Reasons are logicaland discuss how their role will contribute to the problem or issuesolution.
26.0ptsPeopleinvolved are listed and two reasons are included. Reasons are logicaland mostly discuss how their role will contribute to the problem orissue solution.
24.0ptsPeopleinvolved are listed and one reason is included. Reason is logical andmostly discuss how their role will contribute to the problem or issuesolution.
11.0ptsPeople involved are not listed OR reasons are not included.
0.0ptsPeople involved are not listed AND reasons are not included.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss solutions to the problem weighing the stakeholders, cost, and reachable outcomes of each solution.
30.0ptsThreesolutions are listed and data related to the problem with discussion ofthe differences between each solution are noted thoroughly and clearly.
26.0ptsTwosolutions are listed and data related to the problem with discussion ofthe differences between each solution are noted clearly.
24.0ptsTwosolutions are listed and data related to the problem with discussion ofthe differences between each solution is briefly discussed, omittingsome information.
11.0ptsOne solution is listed and data related to the problem with discussion of the solution is noted.
0.0ptsNo solutions are noted or discussed.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePicks one solutionto share with the director and discusses why this solution was chosenover the others. Scholarly article must be published within the last 5years, peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must providethe permalink.
30.0ptsOnesolution is chosen. Thoroughly describes why this solution was betterthan the other one and supports this idea clearly with a reference.Scholarly article must be published within the last 5 years,peer-reviewed, from the Chamberlain library only and must provide thepermalink.
26.0ptsOnesolution is chosen. Mostly describes why this solution was better thanthe other one and supports this idea clearly with a reference. Scholarlyarticle must be published within the last 5 years, peer-reviewed, fromthe Chamberlain library only and must provide the permalink.
24.0ptsOnesolution is chosen. Briefly describes why this solution was better thanthe other one but lacks clear support for this idea. Does not use areference.
11.0ptsOnesolution is chosen. Description is not clear and does not explain whythe other solution was not chosen. No references were used.
0.0ptsNo solution was chosen or described. No references were used.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeShares best approach to deliver solution to director and staff.
30.0ptsBest approach to deliver solution to director and staff is thoroughly described in detail.
26.0ptsBest approach to deliver solution to director and staff is somewhat described in detail.
24.0ptsBest approach to deliver solution to director and staff is briefly described in detail.
11.0ptsBest approach to deliver solution to director and staff is described but difficult to ascertain.
0.0ptsBest approach to deliver solution to director and staff is not noted.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of issue, plan, and desired outcome for the plan is clear and relates to the previous slides.
20.0ptsSummary is clear and relates to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement and desired outcomes.
18.0ptsSummary is noted and relates to the previous slides including the issue, purpose for quality improvement, and desired outcomes.
16.0ptsSummaryis briefly noted and may or may not relate to the previous slidesincluding the issue, purpose for quality improvement, and desiredoutcomes.
8.0ptsSummaryis not clear and may or may not relate to the previous slides includingthe issue, purpose for quality improvement, and desired outcomes. Somepieces may be omitted.
0.0ptsNo summary is completed.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection of learning is displayed with lists, bulleted items, or other creative ways.
20.0ptsThoroughly reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment including value of data.
18.0ptsGenerally reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment including value of data.
16.0ptsBriefly reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment including value of data.
8.0ptsMinimally reflects learning related to leadership action plan assignment does NOT include value of data.
0.0ptsReflectionon learning related leadership action plan assignment including valueof data, is missing or so brief that understanding of concepts isdifficult to ascertain.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting andformatting. Slides are provided and labeled appropriately. Punctuationand sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell andgrammar check. References are in APA format.
10.0ptsAllslides are provided and grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure arecorrect. There is evidence of spell and grammar check. References arein correct APA format
9.0ptsMinimalerrors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. Minimalindicators of spelling or grammar errors. References are in correct APAformat
8.0ptsSeveralerrors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There areseveral indicators of spelling or grammar errors. References are not incorrect APA format
5.0ptsNumerouserrors in punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are manyindicators of spelling or grammar errors. References are not in correctAPA format
0.0ptsManyerrors in writing to the extent that it is difficult to understand themeaning of the information presented on the slides. References are notin correct APA format
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeaker Notes Present
0.0pts0 point deducted
Speaker Notes Present – no deduction in points
0.0ptsPoints deducted
Speaker notes not present on 80% of the slides results in a 10% deduction (20 points).
0.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
0.0pts0 points deducted
Submitted on time
0.0ptsNot submitted on time – Points deducted
1day late = 10 deduction; 2 days late = 20 deduction; 3 days late = 30deduction; 4 days late = 40 deduction; 5 days late = 50 deduction; 6days late = 60 deduction; 7 days late = 70 deduction; Score of 0 if morethan 7 days late
0.0 pts