Power Point Presentation 3

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m trying to study for my Business course and I need some help to understand this question.

prepare a PowerPoint presentation consisting of 5 slides not including the cover slide and the reference slide. Every slide needs to include 100 words in the Notes section..

Please, ensure your name is on the cover slide. You must use at least one reference, in addition to your book. You need to use in-text citations. Your in-text citation and your reference (on your reference slide) must be in APA format.

Topic for PowerPoint Presentation

Discuss best practices for hiring top talent and the process for developing top talent from within the organization.Planning your Research Paper
I need support with this English question so I can learn better.

This week’s writing task will ask you to plan out your essay. You should first have read over the prompt for the final research paper. Next, you should have read over all of the materials about what a body paragraph should be and how it should support the claim.

One you’ve done all of that, I’d like you to create an outline of your essay in which you plan out at least six body paragraphs.

Keep in mind that the reason you plan an essay is so that you can move from one point to another while supporting your claim but not confusing your reader. That means you want to be able to move from one source to another, or one topic to another in a way that your reader can follow and that does not make them feel lost.

As you’re planning these out, you should think back to your annotated bibliography and feel free to plan paragraphs around those sources. Keep in mind that while most of your sources need to be peer reviewed sources, not all of them do and you’ve developed a lot of analysis around those two sources.

For this task please complete the following:

First post your claim at the top of the page.

Then, describe 6 paragraphs that you will write. For each paragraph plan, please include the following

A topic sentence you will use (you can change this later if you need.)

Explain what the goal of the paragraph will be. Will it offer background, make a connection or offer evidence?

Indicate if the paragraph will include Includes a quote sandwich, a well integrated reference, or a summary/paraphrase of a source.

Critical reflection on how it supports the claim and how the evidence supports the topic sentence.

Finally, select one of the proposed and planned paragraphs and write out a draft of a body paragraph.

Once you’ve done this, provide a short reflection indicating how it meets the expectations of the following

A P.I.E. Paragraph(stands for Point, Illustration, Explanation)

Explain how the paragraph supports the claim

IF the paragraph uses a quote sandwich, summary, or paraphrase, explain how it meets the expectations of the sandwich.

I’ve attached the Research Essay Prompt document, the annotated bibliography and the claim. In addition, Here is a link to the SVC Library Research Guide: http://subjectguides.library.skagit.edu/az.php?s=28597&t=4825 You will need to use the Username/Password to access these materials:

Username: [email protected] ; Password: LBasketball5

Feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions or concerns.Physical Security Control: nursing case study help
I’m working on a Computer Science question and need guidance to help me study.

What do you think is the single greatest physical threat to information systems? Fire? Hurricanes? Sabotage? Terrorism? Discuss this question and provide support for your answer. 3 paragraphs.Electronic Mail Security: nursing coursework help
I need help with a Computer Science question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

In no less than 250 words, describe a type of email threat and how a hacker can use it to get sensitive information. How can a network administrator prevent this type of attach from happening?Discussion Responses
I’m working on a Computer Science exercise and need support.

In a 100 words each respond to he following posts and use 1 reference to each of them.

Yves Koffi

Forensic science is organized into a number of disciplines, all of which require specific expertise in one or more areas of the natural sciences. As scientific studies become more sophisticated and developed, the role of the medical examiner continues to play a more important role in crime scene investigations. And because of the complexity of forensics and the many fields of study in this field, the need to establish and maintain professional standards has never been greater. It is therefore not surprising that professional certification in forensic medicine is common and that advancement in the profession often depends on it (“Forensic Certification | Forensic Science Certification”, 2019). Forensic science is unique by its multidisciplinary approach (collaboration with radiologists, pathologists, anthropologists, odonatologists, biologists, psychiatrists etc.), but also by the diversity of possible modes of exercise (hospitals, institutions, expert medicine, mixed activity) . In all cases, the forensic doctor cooperates closely with the legal world (police, magistrates, judicial experts).

Reference:

Forensic Certification | Forensic Science Certification. (2019). Retrieved 17 December 2019, from https://www.crimesceneinvestigatoredu.org/forensic-certification/

Morgan Putnam

The frontline video “The Real CSI” takes a look into the ACFEI and their certification process. After watching this PBS Frontline video and corresponding article entitled “Shake-Up Inside Forensic Credentialing Organization (Links to an external site.)”, I was inclined to believe that PBS was a credible and reliable party. However, after reading the official statement from ACFEI in response to the claims made in the prementioned video and article, “ACFEI’S official statement in response to Frontline’s film and ProPublica’s article (Links to an external site.)”, ACFEI made me question PBS’s validity. However, my position is to agree with the creditability of PBS, since the information presented highlights the importance of thoroughness and certifications.

The pros of my position in supporting PBS is that it is a highly publicized, mass produced media source, meaning that the information produced in this piece will be widely available to the public. Maybe, that will make more people (judges, jurors) aware of certifications/experience (and what they truly mean) and the effect that they can have on cases. It is important that qualified individuals be witnesses in court cases, in order to ensure that proper procedures are followed and that everyone gets the same treatment. Also, if individuals who are not properly certified/trained are handling, retrieving, etc, evidence, then that evidence was not properly obtained through regulated procedures and therefore should not be admissible in court. Additionally, it may force companies like these (giving away false or non-credible certifications) to either rework their process or stop altogether; in turn, allowing for a more streamlined and trustworthy certification process.

The cons of my position is that since PBS is a trusted highly publicized news source, it uses that to its advantage, probably being biased and has omitted certain information. However, from what I have seen from ACFEI’s official statement, the information that has been omitted does not make them anymore credible, as being an organization giving out certificates with the possibility of impacting court decisions (knowingly, may I add, as stated by Mr. O’Block) they should clearly state their intended use somewhere (such as for educational purposes only). Also, another con is it may cause companies who are properly certifying individuals or abiding by the rules to unfortunately be labeled as corrupt or non-credible based on other companies actions. Additionally, with more people on alert, more expert witnesses might be subject to increase questioning of their credentials/expertise by others (which may be a good thing).

From the events that have transpired from the ACFEI ‘s certification problem, it is clear there is an issue in the forensics process of how to not only properly certify an individual, but how to identify a forensics expert as well. It was difficult for me to determine who I believed was credible in this instance, since PBS is a widely publicized news organization and ACFEI “specializes” in forensics, however, the allegations against the company- from the 99% success rate to the Judge in the video stating that sometimes they are so busy with cases they look solely to the certifications to assess an expertise level- led me to believe that PBS was more credible, and that ACFEI should be held responsible. Both sources have their own pros and cons in regard to their credibility.

REFERENCES

Bartos, L. (2014, April 11). Shake-Up Inside Forensic Credentialing Organization. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/criminal-justice/real-csi/shake-up-inside-forensic-credentialing-organization/ (Links to an external site.)

Easttom, Chuck. “Incident and Intrusion Response.” System Forensics, Investigation, and Response, 3rd ed., Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2019, pp. 273–284.

The Real CSI. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/video/frontline-the-real-csi/ (Links to an external site.)

Roberts, J. (n.d.). ACFEI’S official statement in response to Frontline’s film and ProPublica’s article. Retrieved from http://s3.amazonaws.com/propublica/assets/docs/ACFEI.ProPublicaOfficialStmt.pdf

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services