Positive Letter!

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m studying and need help with a Computer Science question to help me learn.

This week the assignment is a Positive Letter! last week we did Negative and got 8.5/10, feedback from professor is included.

please use the slides attached and follow their design/format/organization etc…

please take your time and follow everything she asks step by step, i got feed back on the older ones, we got 5 on the first one because we missed the second part (will contact you in that question’s page). the rest were 8, 8.5 and 9 / 10. ( i will fix myself)

keep it up and ask me when in doubt.

she stressed on giving the good news straight away, and make up info if not strictly given (street name/city/dates etc..)

i wish to have the same writer as always to work on it, that’s why i set a long due date.5 pages essay 047: assignment help online
I’m working on a English exercise and need support.

the first file is my annotated bilbli for the 2 image topic choice，and the second file is my image topic choice，and just follow the final paper requirements. And I need outline today

A single image of fashionable dress, as defined by the focus of this course, will serve as the basis for an exploration and analysis of both historical style and the image itself. The image both guides and focuses the paper: a successful paper consistently analyzes the period and each category through the original image. Each paper will address somewhat different topics, but for the most part will consider cultural context, maker/artist, creator/designer, subject/model, materiality, etc. This assignment builds upon the skills developed in Integrative Design Studio and Seminar. Components are due throughout the semester, and each is graded separately (late work and plagiarism policies in effect for each).

Papers are to be five pages; length assumes Times New Roman or similar font (12 point) or 250 words per page, double-spaced, with one-inch margin on all sides, and additional footnotes, illustrations, and bibliography, with formal academic structure and language. Spelling and grammar and the use of Parsons-mandated formatting (Chicago Manual of Style, Turabian, 16th edition) are counted toward your final grade, as well as quality and number (minimum six) of sources.

Final Paper Topic Choice Proposal/February 24 (5%)

Submit a minimum of two images of fashionable dress that you find compelling and would like to work with throughout the semester. Choose a mediated image — one that conveys fashion as well as its cultural context, typically an illustration, photograph or artwork (avoid garments from museum archives, costume collections, textbook); remain within the course range of 1850-1990s. You are strongly encouraged to submit a family photograph as one of your choices. Your instructor will select the option most appropriate for the assignment, so be sure to list in order of preference. This assignment (and Final Presentation) must be posted on the Learning Portfolio – be sure to link your LP to your Profile Page so your instructor can access and grade your work.

For each image provide the following:

1. Basic background information such as date, context, maker/artist, creator/designer, subject/model — whatever is appropriate, given that you will research the totality of information conveyed by the image.

2. Explanation for your choice: Why do you find the image meaningful? Is it the aesthetic? Subject? Emotion? Memory? Narrative?

3. Discussion of its relationship to your design work and/or personal style.

Bibliography and Outline/March 30 (5%)

The quality of your paper depends on the quality of your sources. For this assignment, provide citations and a rationale (why is this information trustworthy?) for the six sources you will use for the final paper. Use only respected scholarly, academic and institutional sources, both online and in print. The use of non-academic sources, including Wikipedia or any general encyclopedia, will receive a half grade reduction. Papers without a bibliography and/or citations/footnotes will receive an F. Olivia Warschaw, Research Librarian, will conduct an in-class session on research practices for this assignment. The Library also offers one-on-one research consultation appointments – reserve a spot through the Services tab on the Library’s website.

For this assignment, be sure to include the following:

academic or university press texts

at least one journal article

at least one primary source – material that dates from the time period

at least three books

complete citations using Chicago/Turabian formatting

an assessment of the quality of each source

Draft Section for In-Class Peer Review; Image Analysis/April 20

Bring to class two hard copies of any section of your paper (three paragraph minimum) for a peer review session during Recitation. Pages are to be printed and grammar- and spell-checked. Follow the instructions of your Recitation instructor.

Final Paper/April 27 (10%)

Presentations (5%) May 11:

Presentations are held during the final Recitation session according to instructor guidelines; no make-up dates are offered. A component of your presentation must appear on the Learning Portfolio, according to instructor guidelines.

EXTRA CREDIT/Film Response:

Due date and film choices will be assigned by your Recitation instructor – work includes viewing a film and writing an essay of summary and analysis with attention to clothing, body, and comportment and consideration of such aspects as silhouette, textiles, body movement and accessories as they relate to fashionable dress and the medium itself.

WRITTEN WORK GENERAL GUIDELINES – FORMATTING

All assignments must be

— Printed and stapled

— Accompanied by a cover sheet with the following information:

Assignment Title

Your Name

Course Title

Instructor’s Name

Date

Paper length assumes Times New Roman or similar font (12 point) or 250 words per page, double-spaced, with one-inch margin on all sides, and additional footnotes, illustrations, and bibliography, with formal academic structure and language. Spelling and grammar as well as Parsons-mandated formatting (Chicago Manual of Style, Turabian, 16th edition) will be counted toward your final grade.

Following assignment instructions, including correct formatting, will contribute substantially toward high grades. Assignment redos are not offered.

PLAGIARISM: Any work exhibiting plagiarism — either in whole or in sections — will result, without exception, in failure of the assignment and possibly the course. Plagiarism includes using an author’s exact words or his/her ideas without appropriate citations, as well as using substantially similar words and sentence/paragraph structure in published and electronic sources. Any student whose work suggests such copying will be required to submit notes and drafts of their work on the assignment. Students may not use papers previously or concurrently written for other courses. See below for further details regarding the Parsons’ statement on academic honesty and integrity.

Visit the Learning Center! And register early! The University Learning Center provides individual tutoring sessions in writing and ESL support. Sessions are interactive, with tutor and student participating equally. Schedule an appointment via Starfish/Student Success Network, or stop by for a walk-in session, available every hour from 10am to 7pm. The ULC is located on the 6thfloor of 66 West 12th Street. For more information, please visit the Center’s website. Students may be required to attend LC sessions at the instructor’s discretion; confirmations for mandatory sessions are processed via Starfish to the student’s instructor and advisor.If you were the program manager, what would you have done differently to avoid the problems faced by the Dreamliner program?
I’m stuck on a Computer Science question and need an explanation.

The first Boeing 787 Dreamliner was delivered to Japan’s ANA in the third quarter of 2011, more than three years after the initial planned delivery date. Its complicated, unique design (including a one-piece fuselage that eliminated the need for 1, 500 aluminum sheets and 50,000 fasteners and reduced the resulting weight of the plane proportionally), promise of 20% increase in fuel economy and reduction in ‘out of service’ maintenance time, and problems with early testing of the new design all contributed to the giant project’s troubles. Delivery of Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner project was delayed, in part, because of their global supply chain network, which was touted to reduce cost and development time. In reality, this turned out to be a major cause for problems. Boeing decided to change the rules of the way large passenger aircraft were developed through its Dreamliner program; rather than simply relying on technological know-how, it decided to use collaboration as a competitive tool embedded into a new global supply chain process. With the Dreamliner project, Boeing not only attempted to create a new aircraft through the innovative design and new material, but it also radically changed the production process. It built an incredibly complex supply chain involving over fifty partners scattered in 103 locations all over the world. The goal was to reduce the financial risks involved in a S10 billion-plus project for designing and developing a new aircraft and reduce the new product development cycle time. It tapped expertise of various firms in different areas such as composite materials, aerodynamics, and IT infrastructure to create a network in which partners’ skills complement each other. This changed the basis of competition to skill set rather than the traditional basis of low cost. In addition, this was the first time Boeing had outsourced the production on the two most critical parts of the plane- the wings and the fuselage. The first sign of problems showed up just six months into the trial production. Engineers discovered unexpected bubbles in the skin of the fuselage during baking of the composite material. This delayed the project a month. Boeing officials insisted that they made up the time and all things were under control. But next to fail was the test version of the nose section. This time a problem was found in the software programs, which were designed by various manufacturers. They failed to communicate with each other, leading to a breakdown in the integrated supply chain. Then problems popped up in the integration of electronics. The Dreamliner program entered the danger zone when Boeing declared that it was having trouble getting enough permanent titanium fasteners to hold together various parts of the aircraft. The global supply network did not integrate well for Boeing and left it highly dependent on a few suppliers. This case clearly underscores the hazards in relying on an extensive supply chain in which information exchange problems may create extended problems and seriously compromise a company*s ability to carry out business as planned. Creating a radically different process can mean encountering unexpected problems. In some cases, it would put a company so far behind their competition that they were doomed to fail. However, in this case, the major competitor to the Dreamliner, the Airbus 380 program, was also using a global supply-chain model, and its program was delayed by a couple of years. The result for Boeing was a much-anticipated plane with fuel economy and outstanding design that made the wait worth it, but the resulting design, a plane that holds up to 250 passengers, compared to the A380, which has a seating capacity between 525 and 853, was a major compromise.

Question:

If you were the program manager, what would you have done differently to avoid the problems faced by the Dreamliner program?

No Plagarisam, 2 references

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services