PLEASE READ CHAPTER 17 PAGES 357-358 On pages 357-358 (ch. 17), Sen acknowledges

Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

PLEASE READ CHAPTER 17 PAGES 357-358
On pages 357-358 (ch. 17), Sen acknowledges that human rights rely ultimately upon people’s sense of what should be the case; society should recognize and protect human rights he asserts.
But notice in what way Sen has criticized the contractarians; he also calls these persons “transcendental institutionalists”, whose figures include Hobbes, Locke, Rawls, etc. Sen thinks the contractarians deserve blame for their “utopian” thinking. That is, they deserve blame for acting on what they think “should” happen, versus what actually happens in the real world.
Is Sen possibly also guilty of “utopian” thinking in his book? Doesn’t Sen also rely on what should be the case? (for instance when he says that human rights should be recognized and protected globally for everyone)
How is what Sen doing different and more realistic than what the contractarians are trying to do? (this is a very tough question—but you have now finished the book, so I think you are ready for it—you might want to skim the preface and the introduction again before trying to answer this. Sen’s overall argument will make more sense to you now)

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services