Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
Question Description
Module 1 Journal 1.1: Select a Research Topic
DueSunday by9:59pm (Pacific Time)
Points50
Submittinga text entry box or a file upload
Availableuntil Dec 8 at 9:59pm
Description
Students will choose a topic for their long-term research manuscript.
Objectives
Apply critical thinking skills to a real-world issue.
Instructions
After reading the guidelines carefully, choose a topic for yourpaper from the Paper Topics list. You must choose a topic from thislist.
Your journal entry needs to be set-up with each question below listed and then an answer provided.
Be sure that you are listing the question, answering, listing the next question, answering: Example below:
What are two or three questions about specific issues related toyour topic: What happens during the recycling process. How long dorecyclables remain in a landfill before being recycled.
Briefly research your topic to see if any of these questionshave already been answered or if researchers are still looking foranswers: According to Livia Ripka (2018) recyclables are remaining inlandfills due to the exporting of recyclables to China ceasing.
Next, as a journal entry, write the following question and thenanswer the corresponding question about the topic that you’ve chosen:
a. What are two or three questions about specific issues related to your topic?
b.Briefly research your topic to see if any of these questions havealready been answered or if researchers are still looking for theanswers.
c. Next, consider if there are different perspectives on the issues or if theories have changed over time.
d.Finally, think about what purpose you want to have when conducting yourresearch. What research question do you want to answer?
Guidelines for Papers
Paper Topics
Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Development
25.0ptsDevelopmentis fresh, with abundant details and examples that arouse audienceinterest and provide relevant, concrete, specific and insightfulevidence in support of sound logic.
20.0ptsDevelopmentis adequate, but may lack depth, with details and examples that arouseaudience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific evidence insupport of sound logic.
15.0ptsDevelopmentis sufficient but general, providing adequate but perhaps notinteresting details, examples, and evidence that include no logicalfallacies or unsupported claims.
10.0ptsDevelopmentis insufficient, providing scarce or inappropriate details, evidence,and examples that may include logical fallacies or unsupported claims.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
25.0ptsOrganizationis coherent, unified and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/plan and consistently demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetoricaltransitions between ideas and paragraphs. If APA is needed, student isappropriate with reference page and in-text citations.
20.0ptsOrganizationis coherent, unified and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/plan and usually demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetoricaltransitions between ideas and paragraphs. If APA is needed, student haseither appropriate in-text support or reference page, but not both
15.0ptsOrganizationis ineffective at times and may demonstrate abrupt or weak transitionsbetween ideas or paragraphs. If APA is needed, student is missing bothproper in-text support and reference page.
10.0ptsOrganizationis confused and fragmented in support of the essay’s purpose/ plan anddemonstrates a lack of structure or coherence that negatively affectsreadability.
25.0 pts
Total Points:50.0
