Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
Question Description
Please use the concept map to plan care for Mr. Jackson. Mr. Jackson is a 38-year-old African American that presents with an altered level of consciousness (ALOC). He has been having headaches for the last three months but due to a hectic work schedule he has not been able to go to see his medical practitioner. During his last visit two years ago, his blood pressure was slightly elevated, but he never followed up. Upon arrival to the ED a CT scan is completed and it shows a large bleed near the frontal lobe. What should Mr. Jackson’s plan of care include?
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: Concept map: Stroke
Grid View
List View
Novice Competent Proficient ORGANIZATION Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)
Disorganized or illogical format. Examples may or may not be linked or connected
Feedback:
Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)
Minimally organized, logical format. Examples may not be clearly linked or connected
Feedback:
Points: 1 (14.28571%)
Well organized, logical format that provides examples that are clearly linked or connected
Feedback:
CONTENT & MECHANICS
Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)
Minimal number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates marginal conceptual understanding. Information may not be clearly presented & flow through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations
Feedback:
Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)
Partial number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates acceptable conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations
Feedback:
Points: 1 (14.28571%)
Contains appropriate number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates superior conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Correct spelling, grammar & citations
Feedback:
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)
Concept map detail does not show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. Excludes more than one disease if related
Feedback:
Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)
Concept map shows limited pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May overlook more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)
Feedback:
Points: 1 (14.28571%)
Concept map detail must show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May include more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)
Feedback:
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)
Subjective & objective data not included
Feedback:
Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)
Subjective & objective data partially included
Feedback:
Points: 1 (14.28571%)
Subjective & objective data included
Feedback:
NURSING DIAGNOSIS
Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)
Absence of NANDA diagnosis, or does not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’
Feedback:
Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)
Less than two NANDA diagnosis or may not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’
Feedback:
Points: 1 (14.28571%)
Two NANDA diagnosis, including ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’
Feedback:
NURSING INTERVENTIONS
Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)
Less than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis
Feedback:
Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)
Less than 4 but more than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis
Feedback:
Points: 1 (14.28571%)
At least 4 nursing interventions for each diagnosis
Feedback:
GOALS
Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)
Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Not formatted as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)
Feedback:
Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)
Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)
Feedback:
Points: 1 (14.28571%)
One per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)
Feedback:
Show DescriptionsShow Feedback
ORGANIZATION–
Levels of Achievement:Novice 0.33 (4.71428%) points
Disorganized or illogical format. Examples may or may not be linked or connected
Competent 0.67 (9.57142%) points
Minimally organized, logical format. Examples may not be clearly linked or connected
Proficient 1 (14.28571%) points
Well organized, logical format that provides examples that are clearly linked or connected
Feedback:
CONTENT & MECHANICS–
Levels of Achievement:Novice 0.33 (4.71428%) points
Minimal number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates marginal conceptual understanding. Information may not be clearly presented & flow through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations
Competent 0.67 (9.57142%) points
Partial number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates acceptable conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations
Proficient 1 (14.28571%) points
Contains appropriate number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates superior conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Correct spelling, grammar & citations
Feedback:
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY–
Levels of Achievement:Novice 0.33 (4.71428%) points
Concept map detail does not show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. Excludes more than one disease if related
Competent 0.67 (9.57142%) points
Concept map shows limited pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May overlook more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)
Proficient 1 (14.28571%) points
Concept map detail must show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May include more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)
Feedback:
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS–
Levels of Achievement:Novice 0.33 (4.71428%) points
Subjective & objective data not included
Competent 0.67 (9.57142%) points
Subjective & objective data partially included
Proficient 1 (14.28571%) points
Subjective & objective data included
Feedback:
NURSING DIAGNOSIS–
Levels of Achievement:Novice 0.33 (4.71428%) points
Absence of NANDA diagnosis, or does not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’
Competent 0.67 (9.57142%) points
Less than two NANDA diagnosis or may not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’
Proficient 1 (14.28571%) points
Two NANDA diagnosis, including ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’
Feedback:
NURSING INTERVENTIONS–
Levels of Achievement:Novice 0.33 (4.71428%) points
Less than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis
Competent 0.67 (9.57142%) points
Less than 4 but more than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis
Proficient 1 (14.28571%) points
At least 4 nursing interventions for each diagnosis
Feedback:
GOALS–
Levels of Achievement:Novice 0.33 (4.71428%) points
Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Not formatted as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)
Competent 0.67 (9.57142%) points
Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)
Proficient 1 (14.28571%) points
One per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)
Feedback:
Name:Concept map: Stroke
