MKTG600 Assignment

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I don’t understand this Marketing question and need help to study.

Evaluate Marketing Website Assignment: Access the following Website: :http://www.kraftheinz-foodservice.com/

Kraft Foods uses this Website as a part of their marketing strategy. Review the Website and write a 2 page paper on its effectiveness as a marketing tool. Include the things that you feel work well and the things that you feel could be done better.

Course Objectives:
Define channel strategy Design a sales management planArticle Review: nursing assignment help services
Can you help me understand this Political Science question?

Ingraham, P., & Barrilleaux, C. (1983). Motivating Government Managers for Retrenchment: Some Possible Lessons from the Senior Executive Service. Public Administration Review, 43(5), 393-402.

ARTICLE REVIEW

GETTING STARTED

Make sure you understand all requirements for the critical review you have been asked to write. The editors of peer-reviewed journals typical supply “Instructions to reviewers” and/or evaluation forms to structure the reviewer’s comments. Check the assignment instructions for similar information on the expected format and content of your review. Are grading criteria included? Keep such expectations in mind while reading the article, and consult your instructor if you are unclear on any aspect of the assignment.

INTRODUCING YOUR REVIEW

Bibliographic citation. Begin with a full bibliographic citation for the journal article, using the appropriate style guide. For education and other social science research, use APA Style.

Overview. Highlight the purpose, methodology, significant findings and conclusions of the article.

Authorship. Review the author’s qualifications and authority if this information is available. Some journals provide basic information in a separate “Notes on contributors” section. Many scholars provide more detailed information about their research interests and publications on the Internet.

Audience. Identify the intended audience. Consult the journal’s editorial policy or statement of purpose for this information.

Impact. Comment on the article’s reception. Conduct a Cited Reference Search in the ISI Web of science database to see if other authors have cited the article.

ORGANIZING THE BODY OF YOUR REVIEW

The simplest way to organize your review is to follow the structure of the article. A well organized research article has readily identifiable sections including the introduction, methodology, results (findings), and discussion (conclusions and recommendations). Briefly describe, discuss and evaluate the key points involved in each section of the article. Some of the questions which may apply are identified below.

Introduction

Does the author clearly define a research problem or topic? Is its significance explained? Are core issues or research variables identified? Is specialized terminology usefully defined?

Does the author provide an adequate literature review? Does it discuss current research on the problem, and help to situate the author’s own research? Are the research objectives clearly stated? Are hypotheses or specific research questions identified?

Methodology

Does the author clearly identify the research methodology and any associated limitations of the research design? Are participants described, including the method of sample selection if appropriate?

Are instruments adequately described, including issues of appropriateness, validity and reliability? Do any evident biases or ethical considerations arise in relation to the methodology? Are the methods for measuring results clearly explained and appropriate?

Results

Are the author’s major findings clearly presented? Do they adequately address the stated research objectives? Are supporting data presented? Are tables, graphs or figures helpful and well integrated with the text?

Discussion

Do the research results validate the author’s conclusions and/or recommendations? Are alternative conclusions and/or limitations of the research considered? Is there discussion of any variance between the author’s research and prior research findings?

Does the author’s research suggest any direction for further research? Is the practical or theoretical significance of the research emphasized? Does the author recommend the revision of theory or practice in the field?

CONCLUDING YOUR REVIEW

Considering the needs and interests of a typical reader of the journal in which the article appears, provide your personal judgment on the suitability and adequacy of the research. Distinguish between the overall quality of the research project and the report of it as presented in the journal article.

Is the research timely and worthwhile? Is the research design appropriately inclusive and/or sensitive to the cultural context? Are you aware of any significant omissions or errors that might affect the validity or reliability of the research? Are the results original and significant? Does the author provide fresh insight or stimulate needed discussion in the field?

Is the article well structured? Are the sections of appropriate length? Do the author’s style and language maintain interest and clarity? Is the presentation unbiased, objective and reasonable? Is the author respectful of participants and the work of other researchers?

One aspect of learning is to understand the current ideas concerning a topic or issue found within journal articles. Journal articles are academic papers that are published in an academic journal. The review is a summary and evaluation. The article review will be a minimum of 6 pages (12 point font, double-space, times new roman2 Forums post 550 words for both forums
Help me study for my Business class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

Forum 7

Learning Objective: the student will compare and contrast two economic theories using the company’s Domestic and Global environments. Prompt: For this Forum, you are to use the “worst” Company you selected to write about in the Assignments part of the course.
Identify and briefly describe this company for the class and cite the list where you found it rated as a “worst” Company. (SPRINT COMPANY) Using the company’s domestic and global environments, identify the economic environment of each country and compare and contrast it using Rostow and Galbraith (see Lesson and readings and do further research). Explain the specific factors that have caused this company to be rated “worst.” How have — or will – these factors be affected or relate to the company’s economic environment domestically and globally? How should the company respond to the limitations or barriers posed by its economic environment? Critique your classmates’ posts with constructive feedback. This forum is a companion to your Week 7 Assignment.

Instructions: (NOTE: Review the Forum Rubric to understand the requirements, and how your Forum participation is evaluated and scored.)
Minimum text length: 275 words (See Rubric for how post length is evaluated.)
2. MKTG forum

Answer the forum questions, listed below, for this week. You need to post your main post by the end of Thursday. Your main post should be one paragraph per question. All replies need to be posted by the end of the week. Remember to provide at least two responses.

1. Salespeople play three primary roles. What are they? Salespeople create value in what two ways? Ch 13

2. Do customer relationships begin as transactional and move toward strategic partnerships? Ch 13

3. Should a company be happy or concerned if most customers are satisfied? Ch 14Feasibility Study: Proposal Overview
I’m trying to learn for my Business class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Write an introduction to a feasibility study. Complete the first two sections of a feasibility study based on a scenario of your choice.
Introduction
A feasibility study in health care is part of a strategic plan designed to examine a need, or perceived need, within a health care organization. It is the process of investigating and analyzing the viability of idea and answering a broad range of questions. For decision makers, it is an essential element to prevent the wrong decision from being made, or to validate that the idea being studied is the right choice to make.For your feasibility study, you may draw upon an actual experience in your current workplace, or use the case study provided. If you choose to develop a study based on your actual work situation, please be certain that:
You have talked to your supervisor, manager, or director to determine if the policies of your organization allow for the use of internal proprietary information. You have access to the data you will need to complete the study. The “Organization Background” section of the study provides enough information for a reader to understand the nature and complexity of your organization.
Many learners are employed by large, complex health systems; these cautions are provided to make sure you can meet the requirements of the feasibility study.If you choose your own workplace, please pick one of the following options on which to base your feasibility study. If you want to use a different situation, please contact your faculty.You have been asked by the CEO of your organization to develop a feasibility study for one of the following:
To address a market opportunity. To mediate a systemic problem. To address an issue in quality.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services