Medical Ethics

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I need an explanation for this English question to help me study.

This is a paper about phyician assisted suicide please create an outline and roughdraft

Your term paper should:
Discuss the technical aspects of your topic in general terms. Discuss the public policy debates relevant to the topic you choose. This section should cover arguments that are in favor of and opposed to the use of the techniques or products. Express your personal opinion regarding the importance of the topic and the validity of the pro and con arguments.
OUTLINE
Your submission must include an introduction, body, and conclusion sections in outline format. Each section of your outline should include topic sentences and paragraph transitions that help tie your major points together. Your outline must follow current APA style formatting. Refer to the writing resources below to get started.
ROUGH DRAFT

A rough draft is not expected to be polished, and as such, this assignment will be graded on a completion basis. However, in order to receive full credit for the assignment, the following components must be met:
The rough draft includes an introduction, a minimum of four body paragraphs, and a conclusion. A minimum of three references are incorporated as supporting evidence. Use the outline you posted as a guide. As you draft you may find that changing some pieces is necessary for the paper to make sense. Be sure to follow APA style formatting for your paper and cite your sources.Chief Executive Office
I’m studying for my Law class and need an explanation.

The responsibility of implementing any community-policing effort lies with the Chief Executive office of the law enforcement agency. Many of these community policing efforts have to do with violence in low income areas. Navigate to kansascitynova.org and review the material provided by the organization. Using peer reviewed articles and other professional publications including local newspapers, search for information about Kansas City Nova and learn how the community has responded to the program.

In approximately 150 words, summarize what you have learned and cite any sources you have used. Then, in approximately 300 words, address the following issues;

1) Analyze the role of the Chief Executive’s office in this effort.

2) Evaluate the work of the Chief Executive’s office and suggest further solutions that might be helpful.

3) In regards to maintaining the momentum of the program, how would you advise the Chief’s Office to deal with periods of time when violence increases rather than decreases?On the instruction: nursing homework help
I’m studying for my Sociology class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

Direction Point: The philosopher Plato was not a big fan of the Athenian form of government. Please watch the following video that shows The Allegory of the Cave, which depicts Plato’s idea about how ordinary people understand the world about them. Then, read the articles found in the second and third link.

What was Plato trying to communicate through The Allegory of the Cave? What issues did Plato have with Athenian democracy? (This question MUST be done on one page with 300 words).

Why did Plato believe that ordinary people should not be allowed to govern? What types of characteristics should a philosopher-king have? <<<<<< (This question MUST be done on one page with 300 words as well). This is a reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69F7GhASOdM Finally, read the excerpt below from (found below) This is another reference: http://facultyfiles.frostburg.edu/phil/forum/PlatoRep.htm Reference which also can be used: In mapping out the constitution for his utopian society or state, Plato starts out with a schematic description of the human soul. Every soul, according to him, is composed of three parts: bodily desires and appetites, “spirited emotions” like ambition and courage, and finally the faculty of knowledge and reason. In a healthy individual all three parts fulfill their proper function. Bodily desires and appetites secure the physical survival of a person, the spirited emotions inspire his more far-reaching plans and projects, and the intellectual faculties make sure that all enterprises remain reasonable and under rational control. Plato lays great stress on the disciplining function of reason. Without the self-discipline imposed by reason a person may easily turn into something like a self-destructive glutton, or into a person carried away by foolish emotions and thoughtless ambitions. Informed reason, according to Plato, is the faculty best suited to make all the right and necessary decisions in a person’s life. The utopian society described in the Republic has a similar tripartite structure as the human soul. Corresponding to the bodily desires and appetites of the soul is the class of people who are involved in the economy of a state. This class constitutes the vast majority of the people, and it comprises such diverse groups as craftsmen, farmers, merchants, manufacturers, and money changers or bankers. Plato classifies all of them as “lovers of money.” Corresponding to the spirited emotions in the soul is the much smaller class of the armed forces, the class of professional warriors that is responsible for the safety of the community. Plato calls them “lovers of honor.” Their main desire is to gain fame and admiration by serving their fellow citizens—for whom, in extreme situations, they are willing to sacrifice their lives as well as their material possessions. Corresponding to the faculty of reason is the smallest class of people—scientists, scholars, high-level experts, and similar sophisticates. Plato calls them “lovers of wisdom,” i. e., “philosophers.” Their most passionate interests are understanding and knowledge, and their greatest pleasure a lively life of the mind. As a just and healthy person is governed by knowledge and reason, a just society must be under the control of society’s most cultivated and best informed minds, its “lovers of wisdom.” Just societies cannot be run by big money or armed forces with their too narrow agendas. Limitless desire for wealth and blind ambition must be watched and contained as potential public dangers. The most informed minds must determine objectively, with due consideration of all points of view, what the most healthy and practical goals for the commonwealth are. This rule by society’s best minds is the core concept of Plato’s so-called “philosopher kings.” Until now crucial decisions concerning war, peace, and the welfare of society had always been left to corrupt or incompetent politicians, ignorant voters, over-ambitious generals, and other people unsuited to run a state. Bloodshed, hatred, waste of resources, and deplorable conditions had usually been the result. There is no chance for things to become better unless knowledge and reason are put in command—the best knowledge and the most competent reason that society can muster. Lovers of wisdom may not be eager to govern, as their main passions are more intellectual pursuits. But since they are the best trained and best informed minds, they must be obligated by law to run the state—as a sort of committee of technocrats. “Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy, … cities will never have rest from their evils,” as Plato suggests in the Republic. (3) Plato was fully aware of how outlandish such an idea must have sounded in the ears of most of his contemporaries, an idea that was rendered even more fantastic by his contention that women are as capable of being philosophers and governors as men, and that no member of the government should be allowed to own or accumulate property while in office. Plato himself poked subtle fun at the strangeness of what he was proposing, and some scholars are not sure just how seriously Plato took the proposals of the Republic himself. Still, the book’s discussion of good government provides arguments that give philosophers and political scientists pause. The Republic’s critique of democracy in particular is too substantial to be simply dismissed as eccentric speculation.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services