Many people may feel like beetles and moths of are no consequence but what happens when the same technology spreads to birds?

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

DB 9
by Johnsolene Caffey – Sunday, February 27, 2022, 5:59 PM
Number of replies: 0
Johnsolene Caffey A&P DB 9 2/27/2022
During the Ted Talk Mr. Wolpe states that we need to discuss if things we are doing in terms of bio engineering are indeed ethical. He states that we can no longer think of this as a futuristic problem but realize that it is occurring now and prepare to have the discussion and make legislation regarding it. I agree with Mr. Wolpe, not only do we need to outline some ethical boundaries, we also need to decide what is necessary, helpful, or meaningful to society. Because, while some of the examples he used seemed important and fascinating, other examples seemed frivolous and self-gratifying.
The beginning of the Ted talk speaks of random mutations that occurred in nature, that we ourselves did not control. This type of evolution or change was necessary to survive. The second type of evolution involved man’s changes in its environmental niche, like switching from a nomadic lifestyle to a more permanently fixed one. This occurred as man stopped roaming for food and suitable climates and were able to adjust to varying climates and grow/sustain food. This change was positive as it prolonged the lifespan of humans. However other niche changes like moving from a more physical lifestyle to that of sedentary one has not served us well, as we are no longer physically in shape, suffer from diabetes and heart conditions and in some cases experience shorter life spans than our ancestors. The last or current evolution is that of our own personal design which I think is extremely dangerous. As others have stated it allows humans to play God.
This type of evolution has led to designer hybrid dogs, that would not exist in nature, or creations like the beefalo or liger. While these creations may represent scientific advancements, what does it actually do to make our lives better? As weird as it sounds insects with chips and GPS tracking devices could replace drones. These insects could potentially alert us to weather patterns, provide intel during war or times of conflict and ultimately save human lives. But again, is it ethical to make a bettle or a moth into a micro drone, taking away its freedom to just be a bug. Would our technology alter how it eats, migrates etc. Could our technology lead to their extinction? Many people may feel like beetles and moths of are no consequence but what happens when the same technology spreads to birds? If we do not heed the words of Mr. Wolpe, we will find ourselves in a situation where legislation and governance are reactionary versus proactive and precautionary.
Reference:
Wolpe, Paul R (2010, November) It’s time to question bio-engineering. TEDtalk. Retrieved on 2/27/22 from https://www.ted.com/talks/paul_root_wolpe_it_s_time_to_question_bio_engineering?language=en

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services