Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
I’m stuck on a English question and need an explanation.
List 5 points from this week’s first set of readings and 5 points from the second set of readings that you find relevant for the colonies’ movement towards Revolution. Try to include something from each author. See if you can work in something related to the Enlightenment.
Do not use quotes from the text without quotation marks. Do not use a quote without explaining what the quote means in your own words.Reading review: nursing coursework help
I’m studying for my Political Science class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?
Directions: The purpose of this assignment is for you to demonstrate your knowledge of the required course material: chapters 1-5 of the Scott text and other required readings. Therefore, outside sources are to be limited to information for examples. Each response should be 2-3 well-developed paragraphs in length (200-350 words), written in your own words.
Please use the Chicago Manual of Style (available through the Library website) for all citations and other document formatting. The assignment will be graded using the Review Assignment Rubric posted in Canvas. (125 points)
Reminder: Your assignment will automatically be sent to Turnitin when you submit it in Canvas. Therefore, I highly recommend that you submit it a day or two early to determine if all material has been properly cited. This will provide time for you to correct any citation errors that may occur.
Short Answer Questions:
There are several similarities and differences between international law and the ways in which law operates in a domestic – within a state – context. Thoroughly but succinctly compare and contrast international and domestic law with respect to its creation, implementation and enforcement. Be sure to use specific material from the readings. The UN is often characterized as being instrumental in the creation and implementation of international law. Evaluate the extent to which you think the UN in particular, and IGOs in general, help or hinder the creation, implementation and enforcement of international law. Thoroughly but succinctly explain your response using specific material from the readings. Scott discusses several different international judicial bodies – courts, tribunals, etc. Focusing on the ICJ, discuss the effectiveness of the Court with respect to interpreting and implementing international law. Pay particular attention to matters of jurisdiction, advisory opinions, and contentious cases.Discussion case study question
I’m trying to learn for my Sociology class and I’m stuck. Can you help?
1.Case Study: Supervisor and Employee Romance
It is not uncommon for colleagues to discover their common personal interests in the workplace, but most organizations and agencies rather frown on the development of romantic relationships. If you were the supervisor and found yourself involved in a romantic relationship with an employee over whom you exercise authority, what ethical principles may be violated, and what would be your ethical obligations? Discuss what your decisions would be, and the reasoning behind those decisions.
Analyze the application of three specific ethical principles (giving due consideration to the National Organization of Human Services’ “Ethical Standards for Human Services Professionals”) that you suggest should guide a supervisor engaged in a romantic relationship with an employee and that address the problem of the power relationship.
Your initial post must:
Be at least 250 words in length. Contain a minimum of two references with citations in APA style.
2Case Study: Employee’s Intimacy With a Client
Human services professionals have the unique role among most professionals of serving as an ally to clients, friends, and employees working together. The potential for engaging in dual roles (the professional and the personal-intimate) is a challenge to the profession, since human relations do depend on emotions as well as rational actions.
Consider the scenario of the counseling psychologist and her daughter, a mental health counselor, from the case example on pages 329–330 of the Becoming an Ethical Helping Professional text. This case study requires your decision on the most appropriate approach to solving the dilemma produced by the daughter’s relationship to her client. Suppose that you are responsible for supervising the psychologist in her relationship to her daughter and the daughter’s relationship to the client.
Evaluate and discuss the complex relationship between the members of this case, expressed in terms of dual-role analysis. Present your decisions for how best to resolve the dilemma posed by the case.
Your initial post must:
Be at least 250 words in length.topic: bullying can lead to juvenile delinquency
I’m working on a Law exercise and need support.
Students should format the paper according to APA style rules. The paper should be double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font.
The paper should be a minimum of 5 pages, but no more than 7 pages, not including the title page and references. The paper should not include an abstract.
Students should use a minimum of 5 outside resources in the paper, not including the course textbook – if it is used at all.
The paper should demonstrate critical thinking of how the topic is applied to policy, practice, theory, or issues in juvenile delinquency. Personal opinions should not be included. Comments should be grounded in scientific research and literature on the topic. The paper should include a comprehensive description and integration of one or more of the learning objectives in the course as it relates to the topic chosen.
Book: Juvenile Delinquency: pathways and prevention.
authors: mallet, c.a & m.f. tenor. (2019)
note: Chapter 9This assignment mostly follows the perimeters Writing Assignment #2–the big difference is that you will be working on a case in preparation for the debate. Be sure that you have identified the central conflict of values in the case, propose a solution, p: assignment help online
I’m studying for my Philosophy class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?
This assignment mostly follows the perimeters Writing Assignment #2–the big difference is that you will be working on a case in preparation for the debate. Be sure that you have identified the central conflict of values in the case, propose a solution, provide three reasons to support your proposal (virtues of your proposal, duties satisfied, good consequences, application of moral principles, argument by analogy, etc), and raise a strong objection and provide a response.
A note about the due date: it would be best to submit your work as soon as the 28th; the due date of the 29th is soft. Be sure that you have submitted your first draft no later than the 3rd of March.
Why would you turn in your work earlier than the 3rd? Because you are more likely to receive feedback before your team debates–enabling your team to take advantage of our comments.
Development
After selecting/being assigned a case–
First, identify one of the central and unique ethical conflicts or “issues” at stake in the case. This will ensure that you develop a solution to the case that is relevant to the case; it will also help you focus your argument. Second, develop (a) a proposed solution, (b) at least three reasons supporting this solution (this is where additional research starts to become crucial), (c) at least one reasonable and strong objection to your position, and (d) a response to that objection (you might respond by giving reasons against the objection, or by modifying your proposal to minimize the significance of the objection). Be mindful of perspectives and values you may be denying, ignoring, and demoting. Avoid doing this as much as possible. But when you find that it is unavoidable, think of your reasons for doing so.
Format
Introduction
A recap of the case (for someone who has not read it)—keep this as brief as possible Mention of the key issue (conflicting values) of the case you are focusing on. Provide your proposed solution; include essential and relevant definitions of terms, caveats, limitations of principles you might be using, etc.
Argument
At least three reasons to support your proposal. Each of these three should probably be discussed within its own paragraph.
Objection and Response
A strong objection to your proposal A response
There is no need for a concluding paragraph.
Your work should be around 3 to 5 pages in length (double-spaced). Include a works cited for any additional research you do.
Rubrics
Introduction [out of 75 points]
A recap of the case (for someone who has not read it)—keep this as brief as possible [15 pts] Mention of the key issue you are focusing on [15 pts] Your proposed solution; include essential and relevant definitions of terms, caveats, limitations of principles you might be using, etc. [45 pts]
Argument [out of 150 points]
At least three reasons to support your proposal. Each of these three should probably be discussed within its own paragraph. [50 pts per reason—reasons should be relevant and strong]
Objection and Response [out of 75 points]
A strong objection to your proposal [25 pts] A response [50 pts]