KB7040: IT – Sustainable Development for Engineering Practitioners – Report Writing Assessment Answer

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Code: KB7040
IT Assessment Answer
Assignment Task: KB7040

Module title: Sustainable Development for Engineering Practitioners

Module code: KB7040

Assignment title: Report

% Weighting (to the overall module): This assignment is worth 60% of the module marks.

The mechanism to be used to disseminate to students: Seminar & via eLP

Date and time of submission by student: 6th May 23.59

The mechanism for submission of work by student: via eLP

Date by which work, feedback, and marks will be returned to students: 20 working days after the submission date

Mechanism(s) for return of assignment work, feedback and marks to students: via eLP

Objectives for the portfolio : KB7040
To examine your awareness and critical understanding of the application of analysis tools. To demonstrate your ability through the application of software to obtain environmental impact data. To show your ability to critically discuss the outcomes and comment on data uncertainty.
Task 1: KB7040
You will work in a group for this component of assignment on LCA study. The group work involves planning, specifying goal and scope, obtaining data and doing the inventory analysis.
The interpretation and critical discussion of findings along with a discussion on data and the ethical/social issue should be your individual work, please take note of the marks allocation for the division of the group and individual marks.
Using the LCA software SimaPro, conduct a short Life Cycle Assessment following the four-step approach outlined in ISO14040 standards on an allocated scenario.
Each group will be allocated a scenario to develop during the assessment during the timetabled workshop sessions
Task 2: KB7040
Based upon a selected or allocated product use the CES EduPack EcoAudit tool to obtain potential impact figures for a range of material selection choices. Consider how you determine the potential range of values that may be obtained to represent the use of the product and present these data in terms of the use that may be made of the tool’s output. You will include all cradle to cradle considerations such as extraction, primary processing, secondary processing, transportation, use, recovery, and unavoidable disposal. You will also discuss aspects of material supply chain risk such as abundance, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, conflict and legislation, and regulation.
Present your results in a short report which will define your inputs and assumptions with an evaluation of conclusions reached, their impact and potential limitations of the ‘EcoAudit’ analysis approach.
You should include both the available data for the item itself and also the subsequent use. This will require you to make some assumptions, you may use assumptions within public sources and/or your own experience as a guide.
The following items will be made available on the eLP module site: Student copy of the CES EduPack software.
CES Edupack support tutorial and guide material.
An example of exercise and solution.
The allocated renewable energy component will be made available during the classes in addition workshop facilities may be called upon during the initial investigation.
Additional Information for Task 2: KB7040
You are required to consider a product and to carry out an EcoAudit of the original and modified product or artifact.
You are expected to consider alternative material types (note not material grades) and may make and state assumptions for any parameters not given.
Consider in your discussion the output from the EduPack EcoAudit and additional factors relating to sustainable material choices informed by the full contents of each material’s database within the software. Make suggestions as to the whole life energy impact.
Assignment Files and Links:
Tutorial files and exercises are on the eLP and the CES EduPack is available for download from the ‘NTAPPS’ drive on Faculty open access and lab PCs.
Your submission for task 2 – The report must not be more than 7 pages including all graphs, tables and charts. All work will be submitted electronically as a pdf file.
Additional instructions to students:
For task 1 – The brief background on the identification of processes, Goal & Scope, assumptions, etc, and LCA Inventory Analysis should be carried out in groups, while the rest of the report will be individual work.

For task 2 – This component of the assignment should be carried out individually.
Additional Guidance:
A seminar will be held when the assignment information pack is distributed.
Further Information:
Module Aims and Learning Outcomes: KB7040
This module will develop the theme of the role and responsibility of the engineer within society and enable the student to place sustainable development within the context of professional engineering practice. To support the successful professional practice, as defined by the Engineering Council, engineers need social literacy and an appreciation of the wider issues in sustainable development which are the focus of this module.
Module learning outcomes:
Knowledge & Understanding: KB7040
1 – You will be able to critically define aspects of sustainable development pertinent to engineering practice,
2 – You will be able to critically appraise data obtained through a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods.
Intellectual / Professional skills & abilities: KB7040
3 – You will be able to apply ethical judgment to demanding situations at the interface between society and technology.
Personal Values Attributes: KB7040
4 – You will be able to recognise professional obligations to society and the environment.
Assessment criteria/marking scheme: KB7040
Task 1 -Brief background on the identification of processes (only 3 processes) – 8 marks (group work)
Task 1 – Goal & Scope, assumptions, etc – 6 marks (group work)
Task 1 – LCA Inventory Analysis – 23 marks (group work)
Task 1 -Interpretation of results and critical analysis – 20 marks (individual work)
Task 1 –Critical analysis on the social/ethical dimension on the topic of your group presentation (maximum of 1 page) -15 marks (individual work)
Task 2 -Selection and presentation of data through the application of software – 14 marks (individual work)
Task 2 -Justification of assumptions and discussion of conflicts and limitations – 14 marks (individual work)

Referencing style: KB7040
Please use the Harvard referencing style. Visit http://www.citethemrightonline.com/ for help and information about correct referencing.
Further assistance with academic reading, writing and referencing is available via Northumbria Universities Skills Plus web page.
Expected size of the submission: KB7040
For task 1 – The report must not be more than 12 pages including all graphs, tables, and charts.
For task 2 – The report must not be more than 7 pages including all graphs, tables, and charts.
The table below sets out the Universities policy regarding word limits: KB7040
Under the word limit
No Penalty: In not making use of the full word count, students may have self-penalised their work. If students have been able to achieve the requirements of the assessment using fewer words than allocated, they will not be penalised.
Up to 10% over the word limit
No Penalty: Situation flagged by tutor in feedback but over-run is tolerated and no deduction is made from the final mark.
More than 10% over the word limit
The marker will stop reading when they judge that the word count exceeds the recommended word count by more than 10% i.e. for a 3000-word essay, the marker will read only the first 3300 words and will indicate on the text where they stop reading.
The content following this point will not be read and a mark will be awarded only for the content up to this point.
Academic integrity statement: KB7040
You must adhere to the university regulations on academic conduct. Formal inquiry proceedings will be instigated if there is any suspicion of plagiarism or any other form of misconduct in your work. Refer to the University’s Assessment Regulations for Taught Awards if you are unclear as to the meaning of these terms. The latest copy is available on the University website.
Failure to submit: KB7040
The University requires all students to submit assessed coursework by the deadline stated in the assessment brief. Where coursework is submitted without approval after the published hand-in deadline, penalties will be applied as defined in the University Policy on the Late Submission of Work.
Anonymous marking: KB7040
University policy requires that work be marked anonymously. In order to facilitate this, we request that only your student number is included on work submitted for summative assessment.
This KB7040: IT Assessment has been solved by our IT experts at TVAssignmentHelp. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services