Is the author’s exegesis of the texts they discuss accurate, charitable, and relevant?

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Choose 3 questions from the statement of belief essay for further inquiry. Pick the ones that were either most interesting to you, the ones you felt you’ve changed your opinion on, or the ones you feel most strongly convicted of. Most especially, pick the ones that are causing you anxiety or worry. This is a natural reaction when your deeply held beliefs are challenged. Introduction, 1 paragraph Once you’ve chosen your issues, restate briefly what your beliefs were concerning those issues at the outset of the course. Don’t quote your statement of belief essay directly, instead try to capture the essence of those answers in the briefest possible summation. You should make mention of only the most relevant autobiographical details that shaped your moral worldview, before the beginning of this course, by way of explanation. Subjecting your specific ethical beliefs to an interrogation, 3–6 paragraphs total Then, devote 1–2 paragraphs to each of the three themes you’ve selected to articulate how those beliefs have been impacted by the arguments of the course, either positively or negatively. This will require the recapitulation of the arguments in the course that either changed your position, or that you had to refute. If your belief changed, which arguments convinced you? And if your opinion has stayed the same, explain why the arguments opposed to your view failed to persuade you, and which arguments convince you that you are right. Defending a coherent position First, assess your set of claims for consistency. If you find inconsistencies, rectify them by either changing one of your beliefs, or explaining how an apparent inconsistency is not a true inconsistency. 1–2 paragraphs Next, defend your convictions, whatever they are, against objections. This will require some additional research on your part. Find at least one article that disagrees with your position for each claim you are defending (i.e. three articles total) and argue against your detractors. Use logic and reasoning to show how your opponent’s arguments are invalid, unsound, fallacious, incomplete, or inconclusive. 6–9 paragraphs. Assess the impact of your additional research. Did consideration of their arguments impact your beliefs at all? How confident are you in your position? What additional things might you need to learn about in order to strengthen the convictions you are defending in this paper? 1–2 Paragraphs ***************12–20 paragraphs total, or no more than 10 pages.*************** Format: No cover page, Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, 1 inch margins, double spaced, works cited, MLA, APA, and Chicago format are all acceptable, use in-text citations, make references as specific as possible including page number, citations from our textbook should be to the specific articles you cite, not to the textbook as a whole, staple all pages, name in header of all pages, page numbers in footer. Grading Rubric for the self-examination essay: A: the paper meets every stipulation in this essay prompt, exhibits mastery of the material covered, is introspective and thoughtful, with flawless writing, organization, and formatting. C: the paper satisfies every requirement in the prompt but does so ineloquently, with only a satisfactory grasp of the material covered, the organization is lacking, writing contains mistakes, and formatting is not exactly as specified below. F: the paper fails to meet all of the stipulations in the above prompt, or exhibits unsatisfactory understanding of the material, or lack of proper organization renders the writing difficult to follow, or the writing is riddled with mistakes. The structure of your paper should look like this, in order: Introduction Subjecting your specific ethical beliefs to an interrogation, Issue 1 Defense of your Position, Issue 1 Subjecting your specific ethical beliefs to an interrogation, Issue 2 Defense of your Position, Issue 2 Subjecting your specific ethical beliefs to an interrogation, Issue 3 Defense of your Position, Issue 3 Coherence Check Conclusion Guide to peer to peer review: 1. Is the paper organized in a way that makes the argument and thesis of the author clear and easy to follow? 2. Is the thesis stated clearly, and supported throughout the paper? 3. Is the author’s exegesis of the texts they discuss accurate, charitable, and relevant? That is, do they summarize only those parts that are necessary for the articulation of their thesis, or do they use textual exegesis as a crutch to avoid having to make arguments? 4. Evaluate the authors arguments. Are they valid? Are they sound? Do they persuade the reader? 5. Does the author give a fair hearing to the view that disagrees with their own? In other words, do they make a steel man or a straw man of their opponent? 6. Do they successfully respond to their critic? (assuming they gave a fair hearing to the other side or sides of the argument) 7. Is it clear where the authors thoughts end and the authors he cites thoughts’ begin? 8. Are sources notated and referenced correctly? One way to figure this out is to ask: “would I be easily able to go look up the sources the author cites?” 9. How is the author’s writing? Grammar? Syntax? Vocabulary? Etc. 10. This list is not exhaustive, let the author know of any other problems or recommendations you think will help them improve the paper. statement of believe from the beggining added, suppose to choose 3 questions from that

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services