Skip to content
Home » Is it sufficiently attention-grabbing to catch the Editor’s eye?

Is it sufficiently attention-grabbing to catch the Editor’s eye?

    Learning Goal: I’m working on a literature question and need support to help me learn.Important:Read the proposal I’ve uploaded and based on it write the report given.Aim of this assignment: To make sense of how words, numbers and secondary data are used in a specific business or management context and to synthesize sources within a critical literature reviewIn this course, we developed a shared understanding of master’s level research, which embraced the making sense of selected sources. We also presented an opportunity to refine a range of masterly skills. In particular, we encouraged you to develop the skills needed to understand, critique and utilise research conducted by others and to consider how you might conduct research within your organisational and professional context.We would like you to work independently and, having adopted an appropriate methodology, to:- Produce a critical literature review that informs your proposed research, into a business problem.- With respect to format, we require you to use a journal presentation and adopt a succinct, focused style of writing.- Adopting a scholarly practitioner stance, you may draw on a range of “quality” literature, as long as your work remains focused on a complex practice-based problem, although “quality” implies that peer-reviewed journal articles would be used predominantly.- You have to make sure to cover these criteria while preparing the:-Clearly explains the problem, and justifies why it is important from a personal perspective-Provides a precisely written two researchable question that are more specific than the aim but derived from the problem and justifies why it is important from an organisational perspective-Explains and justifies the method(s) used in conducting the literature review-Clarifies how the researched area fits into wider debates in the literature-Demonstrates knowledge of the relevant literature by identifying key debates-Identifies appropriate concepts and theories, and presents items in a logical structure-Identifies and explains links and connections between authors and themes-Synthesises material and identifies patterns and trends in the literature-Presents a clearly written narrative, with correct grammar and spelling, in journal style format; uses consistent and correct referencing in both the writing and bibliography-Your work will be assessed in a holistic manner, similar to a peer-review process. Within the master’s level remit, we will focus on the extent to which your critical literature review achieves the relevant learning outcomes. However, whilst we will evaluate the quality of the writing overall, for example being analytical, rather than descriptive, we will also use the Criteria given above to inform the feedback and mark allocation for the assessmentAs you will be writing in a journal style, we feel it is appropriate to structure your assessment around a series of headings: Title of Work – Think creatively. Is it sufficiently attention-grabbing to catch the Editor’s eye?
    Abstract – Outlines the purpose, background and significance of the review article, in fewer than 120 words.
    Keywords – Identifies up to five keywords that highlight the central foci.
    Methodology – Clearly explains and justifies the approaches used to select and organise material.
    Introduction – Sets out the researchable question, briefly explains why the topic is chosen and provides contextual background to the study. Identifies where the review sits within the wider scholarly landscape.
    Main body – Develops the main arguments: identifies trends and patterns in theories and authors, and alerts the reader to criticisms. Takes the reader on a logical journey and presents well-developed sub-sections that focus on a “story” or themes, rather than presenting a chronological format.
    Conclusion – Concludes to the purpose outlined in the introduction, with the concluding paragraph providing intellectual closure for the reader.
    References – Carefully detail all sources used and present these in a standard academic format.
    *** Words count = 2800 words.*** In-Text Citations and References using Harvard style.*** Attachment has been uploaded named “Proposal”.*** I share file named “Rapid Structured Literature Review” and “University of Aberdeen Business School”.
    Requirements: As mentioned

    How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

    Clients' Reviews about Our Services