Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
Can you help me understand this Political Science question?
Students are required to write an essay of 1,500-1,750 words in length (excluding the bibliography). Anything beyond 1,750 will not be read or marked. The essay must present a clear and detailed argument addressing the question posed below, and must also discuss TWO IR theoretical approaches. A minimum of 3 academic sources must be used. Sources should be listed in a bibliography, and quotations should be acknowledged where necessary. Please refer to page 20 for the essay evaluation form.
Essay Question:
Which theoretical approach offers the best understanding of one of key issues discussed in the Winter semester? Answer by comparing at least two IR theoretical approaches (or theories).
Some of the key issues to consider (see Winter semester topics):effectiveness of the UN; climate change, environmental degradation; global trade, inequality; poverty and international development; war; international security; terrorism; nuclear weapons proliferation; humanitarian intervention. You can pick a more specific topic within the broad topic (e.g., the Paris agreement; North Korea and nuclear weapons; the war in Yemen; achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs), etc.)
Some of the IR theories/approaches to consider (see Fall semester topics): Realism; Liberalism; Marxist approaches; Critical Theory; Poststructuralism; Feminism; Post-colonialism; Queer international theory; Green theory; and ConstructivismChoose ONE question and answer in 8 page: 1.Explain the paradox of democratic divergence (sources: lectures, Kurlanzick); 2.Explain the paradox of electoral economics (sources: lectures, Bates) ;3 Explain bridging institutions (sources: lectures, Mann)
I’m studying and need help with a Political Science question to help me learn.
Use standard formatting with:
Double spacing, 11 or 12 point font (Times, Helvetica, Calibri, etc.), 1 inch margins, No more than 1 inch of space dedicated to title and header, No extraneous space between paragraphs or headers.
You must turn your exam in by the deadline to receive full credit. Any late exams (even by 1 minute late) will incur a penalty. Papers will be penalized by 1/3 of a letter grade for each day late (e.g., A- → B+, etc.).
The main sources you should use for your essay are indicated in parenthesis in each question below. You must cite all work that is not your own, including lectures. You must include a references section in your paper. The references do not count toward the page limit. While you may use outside sources, you don’t need to do so to get a top grade.
Choose ONE question and answer in 7-9 pages:
Explain the paradox of democratic divergence (sources: lectures, Kurlanzick) Explain the paradox of electoral economics (sources: lectures, Bates) Explain bridging institutions (sources: lectures, Mann)document analysis: nursing homework help
I need an explanation for this History question to help me study.
-Do not change this document. Simply type your responses below the question in complete sentences. Do not use bold or a different color font. You will receive a zero if the worksheet is changed.
-Avoid excesses of language and judgment, as well as meaningless comments (this is a “most interesting document” – outline instead what makes it interesting).
-Never use the personal form (I, me, my)
-Your answers must be typed, Times New Roman, font 12. Margins must be the default margins of the Microsoft Word program (in other words do not mess with the margins!)
-Cite the document parenthetically […] giving the # of the paragraph. Cite every time you raise specific information, or make deductions based on one or more of the paragraphs, as well as when quotations are provided
a)Example (Columbus 1492, para. 3)
-Document sheet below to help answer the questions
-The reading for the worksheet ” The Great RailRoad Strike 1877″ http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=3&psid=1097Two page essay: nursing essay help
Need help with my English question – I’m studying for my class.
Instructions:
Communication is used to inform, to persuade and to analyze. In this assignment, you will persuade the reader of your point of view by supporting a thesis with objective facts and credible evidence.
In the week 2 forum, you selected your topic for this paper. You will take a stance on this issue and support your stance with credible evidence in your body paragraphs.
You will write a 5 paragraph essay.
Guidelines:
In order to persuade the audience to accept the position you are advocating in this paper, you will use different kinds of appeals:
ethos (which involves the credibility of the speaker, writer, or authority being cited); logos (which involves facts, statistics, and logic); and pathos (which involves emotions).
A good persuasive argument uses credible sources, objective evidence, and emotional “hooks” to make use of logos, ethos, and pathos respectively.
Be sure your thesis statement is very clear. It should be a single complete sentence, including both a subject and a predicate, that combine to make claim. Be sure to use a three part thesis statement.
Your introduction paragraph should include a “hook” to grab the reader’s attention. The thesis statement should be the last sentence of the introduction. Your body paragraphs will directly support the thesis. You should use credible sources and cite them according to the style of your discipline. Your conclusion should reiterate the strongest points from your paper and give the audience something to consider, moving forward.
Requirements:
PURPOSE: To persuade AUDIENCE: The applicable audience for the type of document you’ve chosen to write. LENGTH: 500 – 750 words (Times New Roman font) SOURCES: A minimum of 3 with at least 1 from the library, and at least 1 from a professional journal or organization FORMAT: The citation style is APAInterview and interrogation/ DB 3
I’m trying to learn for my Law class and I’m stuck. Can you help?
Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
As the primary investigator on a critical missing person’s investigation, you are to interview and interrogate witnesses and suspects in this case.
Based upon your reading and research, explain how you will use physiological and psychological methods and practices during the course of these interviews and interrogations. Clarify the rationale behind your answer. During the interviews and interrogations, which verbal and nonverbal communication tools would you use, and why? Clarify the rationale behind your answer. Refer to the Web resources for additional information regarding this topic.
