Identify a specific Use Case within which to critically evaluate the business case for or against adoption of the technology in your chosen Use Case based on an evaluation of data that you will collect from a real world prototype or simulation

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Learning Goal: I’m working on a economics writing question and need a sample draft to help me learn.Emerging IT Product Developments Critical Application Project Contents Module Leader4 Key dates and details. 4 Description of the assessment4 Assessment Content5 Assessment Rubric. 5 Anonymous Marking. 5 Assessment Regulations. 6 Optional6 Module Leader Key dates and details Assessment Type: Individual Assessment weighting: 60% Word count Report Learning Outcomes: Be able to identify and apply emerging technologies tools towards the development of an advanced IT product as well as justify and evaluate their developmental decisions
Submission Method: Turnitin Provisional Feedback Release Date: During f2f marking. Description of the assessment Businesses and organisations need to continually develop their systems and technologies in order to be able to meet the challenges of the modern globalised world. Their challenge, however, is to be able to make rational decisions about which technologies they should incorporate in their businesses. Academia and other places of research continually invent new IT concepts, products and approaches, which are often over-sold and many of them fail to deliver the promised benefits and destroy significant amounts of shareholder value. One of the key sources for identifying emerging IT products is the annual Gartner Hype curves for a range of application areas, see https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hype-cycle The Task You will choose one of the current emerging Hype Curve technologies that is interesting to you. You will agree this with your tutor (this counts as a student negotiated assessment). You will then identify a specific Use Case within which to critically evaluate the case for or against adoption of the technology in your chosen Use Case. This critical analysis will require the collection of a range of information and data which will allow you to develop an understanding of the capabilities and limitations of the technology and to cut through the hype that surrounds all new technologies. The products under consideration for the module will typically be in the very early stages of the Gartner IT Market Clock (https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3891445/use-gartner-it-market-clocks-to-guide-technology-product). During the early adoption stages of emerging technologies, many innovative businesses will carry out experiments and develop prototypes to generate data that can be analysed and evaluated to understand the realities of applying that technology. Potential users of these technologies need to be able to critically evaluate the promises and capabilities. This may be done using proof of concept experiments or by generating and collecting data from simulations or the published white and technical papers that describe the technologies. The Task This should be a continuation from your topic in Coursework 1 for the module. You have chosen one of the current emerging Hype Curve technologies that is interesting to you. If you decide to choose a different technology, then you will need to agree this with your tutor (this counts as a student negotiated assessment). You will then identify a specific Use Case within which to critically evaluate the business case for or against adoption of the technology in your chosen Use Case based on an evaluation of data that you will collect from a real world prototype or simulation, or from suitable public sources of data in the event that you do not have access to suitable technical systems and software to create a prototype. Deliverables You will produce a 5 page (+0 / – 10 lines) report in the Springer LNCS format (the page count starts at the beginning of the Introduction and finishes at the end of the Conclusions and Recommendations section). The report will critically evaluate the capabilities of your chosen Emerging technology to deliver its promised benefits. There will be 4 sections as follows. Introduction This section will introduce your project, your proposed context for the Technology to be evaluated and justify your choice of an Emerging Technology and Use Case within which to evaluate the technology. Critical Evaluation and Justification of the Requirements for Data Generation This section will define and justify your approach to generating the data that you will need in order to evaluate the technical proposition for the chosen Technology. If you are implementing a prototype or a simulation of a software system, then you will need to justify your choice of a suitable environment (software package) and outline and justify your requirements specification that will lead you to capturing suitable data.
If you are using open source / published data, then you will need to justify why you are using this route and then define and justify the data that you will be using.
Critical Evaluation and Justification of the Technical Business Case of the Technology You will need to develop and justify the framework that you will use to critically evaluate the Technical and Business case for your technology and use case. You will the critically evaluate the Technical and Business case of your technology to deliver the proposed capabilities and benefits. Conclusions and Recommendations This concluding section will succinctly and persuasively present your conclusions and recommendations. Formatting Requirements You must adhere to the Springer LNCS formatting conventions with only two exceptions which are that you must use the Harvard citing and referencing standards and you must use UK English spelling. It is vital that you use this template and do not change any of the formatting of the template, because meeting these standards is worth 20% of your overall grade for this module (see marking criteria). You must not exceed five pages. Penalties will be applied, as specified in the assessment criteria, for articles that are larger (by any amount) or smaller (by more than ten lines). There will be suitable title section, abstract, table of contents, introduction and conclusion / recommendation sections and References list (which only contains sources that you have cited in your report). You are recommended to use appropriate chapter headings and sub-headings to provide the structure to your report. Please submit the assignment as a single Word document in the Blackboard Assignment Submission link for the module. Please note that all assignments will be checked for plagiarism using computer software (Turnitin) as part of the submission process. Assignments and Submission Details Final Draft Review There will be a mandatory individual face-to-face review of your Final Draft during Week 11, when you will be required to review your approach to the assignment with your lecturer. You will be given a Turnitin submission point for this Final Draft Review and you will receive a mark which reflects the current status of your report with immediate oral and written feedback to help you to improve your report. Final Submission Following the mandatory Final Draft Review, you will then have three weeks to improve your report, for submission to the Final Submission point in Turnitin at the beginning of the first Exam Weekwhen you will then attend a scheduled face2face or online session with your tutor for final marking with immediate oral and written feedback. Grading Marking will be based on four criteria, as shown below. You will be able to use the following rubric as a means to help you to identify how to achieve the very highest possible mark for your assignment as you draft. Remember that you must use citations to provide evidence of your research and where you got all your information from. Please Note: Failure to provide any citations or references will result in a capped overall mark of 35%. Quotations Are Prohibited You are not permitted to use any quotations in your three pages of the report because they distract the reader from your analysis. In addition, your reader is wanting to understand your analysis and thinking rather than learning that you are able to find resources and then copy and paste the words into your report. Even if the words are worth quoting, you still need to write your own justification of how the quotation contributes to your analysis. As a result, you must write your analysis with appropriate citations to the sources of the ideas that you would otherwise have copied and pasted, thus saving words. There is a penalty of 50% of the Employability and Presentation mark if there are any quotations in the body of your report. Tables, Figures, Illustrations etc. must be in the Appendices All tables of data, illustrations, graphs etc. will be placed in relevant appendices which are cross-referenced in the body of the text. There is a penalty of 50% of the Employability and Presentation mark if there are any Tables, etc. in the body of your report. Anonymous Marking As a result of the face-to-face formative and final marking, this assignment will not be set-up for anonymous marking.
Requirements: 3000 words   |   .doc file

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services