Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
I’m trying to learn for my Law class and I’m stuck. Can you help?
Eugenics and Sterilization
The United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Buck vs. Bell forms one of the most important legal document in the history of sterilization. The case involved Carrie Buck who was a feeble-minded woman committed to a state mental institution. Her mental state condition has been present in her family for the past three generations. The case was presented to the Supreme Court after the proposed sterilization of Carrie Buck that had initially gone through the Virginia State Court system. Virginia law allowed for the sterilization of a mentally ill individual with the aim of promoting the health of the patient as well as the welfare of the society. The Supreme Court voted for Sterilization of Carrie Buck and any other American in a similar situation (Buck v. Bell. 274 U.S. 200, 2018). The Supreme Court’s decision led by Justice Olive Holmes stated that ‘three generations of imbeciles are enough.’ It ordered the sterilization of Carrie Buck to prevent her from giving birth to another mentally defective child.
The US Supreme Court decision bolstered the American eugenics movement as well as contributing to the establishment of the legal authority for sterilization of more Americans. Eugenic is a movement aimed at improving the gene composition of humans through the selection of the desired characteristics (Popenoe, 2009). One of the theories of criminology-related to eugenics is Lombroso’s biological theory of criminology that assumes that some humans are born criminals who are physiologically distinct from non-criminals.
The effect of the Supreme Court ruling could not be underestimated as it formed a landmark decision for the American eugenics movement. Even though the decision resulted in Carrie Buck becoming the first person to be sterilized under Virginia’s sterilization law, thousands of Virginians followed. Most of the practices were involuntary as some of the patients did not agree to them but the law required them to undergo the procedure. The procedure finally ended in the 1970s countrywide resulting in the repealing of the Virginia Sterilization Act in 1972. However, in 2012 the justification of the sterilization of the feeble-minded patients set by the Buck vs. Bell case had not been overturned.
The issue of eugenics and sterilization is a polarized issue considering that progressive thinkers in the United States who contributed to the consideration of proposals driving positive eugenics were overshadowed with policies regarded as negative eugenics that discouraged or prevented certain individuals from tainting the “race.” The shift in the beliefs supporting eugenic started in the mid-1930s and continued evolving after World War II where the original focus on negative eugenics of preventing people from transmitting defective genes began fading away (Reilly, 2015). It resulted in two new trends emerging where the first trend focused on physicians arguing that women sterilization who were intellectually incapacitated would result in freeing them from institutions as well as allowing them to live without fear of pregnancy. The second trend focused on substantial growth in the movement for the provision of all women with legal access to contraception. The occurrence of such different views says that the study of genetics may not necessarily be sufficient in justifying its use to make decisions such as the ones imposed on Carrie Buck. Besides, its use in the United States stopped at some point highlighting that its use is not certain in predicting the characteristics of the children from a mentally ill individual.
References
Buck v. Bell. 274 U.S. 200. (2018). Buck v. Bell, 274 US 200 – Supreme Court 1927. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=Buck+v.+…
Popenoe, P. (2009). The progress of eugenic sterilization.
Reilly, P. R. (2015). Eugenics and involuntary sterilization: 1907–2015. Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 16, 351-368.Conflict – Apply What You’ve Learned: assignment help online
I’m studying for my Management class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?
As we learn in chapter 13, working in a team often involves recognizing and resolving conflict. In this assignment, you’ll recall a situation and analyze it in terms of what we know about conflict.
Instructions:
Identify and describe a situation where group conflict occurred. It can be work, social, or academic in nature. Identify – was it functional or dysfunctional? Explain your decision. How would you have gone about resolving it?
Submit a response of no less than 500 words.
reference:
Management 9E : A Practical Introduction, Kinicki, Williams.Essay (Literary Research Paper)
I don’t know how to handle this English question and need guidance.
So far, your coursework has explored the important idea that to argue persuasively and make strong claims you need to be in dialogue with others. Your writing assignments have demonstrated this point as you’ve proven yourselves able to analyze and evaluate how professional scholars launch an effective argument by writing the arguments of others into their own texts. For this essay, I’d like you to broaden your understanding of research and academic dialogue by choosing your own set of texts to which you will respond and use to support an original idea (a thesis).
ASSIGNMENT: Write a 1500-word essay in which you develop a thesis on the subject or theme of your choice and support your thesis by bringing together the most salient features from your readings and responding to them. In short, explore an interesting original idea so that your audience can understand something new or different about your topic. With this paper, you will select at least one short story and at least one poem (called primary sources) from the Backpack Literature textbook and locate at least four essays or articles (called secondary sources) from the TROY Library databases. A list of stories and poems by subject and theme is posted in the Week 8 folder to help you find texts in Backpack Literature that might interest you. Now you must explore the connection or pattern of ideas that you believe brings the texts together and says something interesting about your topic. Look deeper into this connection by reflecting upon specific passages in your story, your poem, and the four articles (secondary sources).
Essay Outline:
The introduction should establish the importance of the literary theme or topic you’ve chosen in the opening paragraph. You should consider using an anecdote or some research to demonstrate why the chosen subject is significant to the primary texts (the short story and poem) you’ve chosen to analyze. The introduction insists on the need to redefine the issue/topic.
The thesis asserts a clear and coherent interpretation of the selected theme or topic, explaining the theme/topic’s function within either the primary texts or the work’s genre. Ensure that your thesis is stated explicitly and that it is arguable — above all, make it interesting: how can we think differently about the theme/topic due to your reading of the texts you’ve selected?
The body paragraphs should use effective transition devices and topic sentences to remind readers of your thesis throughout the essay. Each paragraph should demonstrate effective use of your sources (both the primary sources and the researched secondary sources), including effective signal phrases for every quotation from a source and a clear and convincing modeling of the “They Say/I Say” approach to presenting and responding to sources.
The conclusion should leave your readers thinking further about what you’ve presented. Don’t summarize or repeat you main points; instead, restate your thesis in a different way by showing the potential implications of your analysis.
Source Citation: MLA format, including in-text parenthetical citations and a correct Works Cited. This final essay must demonstrate your understanding and proficiency with the use of parenthesis to designate the page of a cited quote from either the primary or secondary source, recognizing that MLA does not make use of “p.” or “pg.” You must show a knowledge of when to include the suthor’s last name within the parenthesis (Bishop 106) and when not to (106). The Works Cited page demonstrates a proper formatting procedures outlined in your Writers Reference textbook as well as at the OWL online reference at https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/11/. The Works Cited procedures include: listing authors in alphabetical order by last name; authors’ last names listed first, followed by first name; proper citation of the title using italics for full-length books and quotation marks for an article, short story, and poem; use of place, publisher, and date of publication for books and journal title, volume and issue, date of publication, and page numbers for articles; use of punctuation inclusing periods, commas, and semi-colons; and proper acknowledgment of medium of publication, inlcuding use of “Print” for physical books and articles consulted and URL and date of access documentation for sources read online (Web. Date).
Due: A completed draft must be submitted to the assignment feature link no later than midnight (CST) on Sunday, July 28. No late papers will be accepted. No exceptions.