HSH725: Research Literacy for Health Practice – Hamilton-Wright – Health Assignment Help

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Internal Code: 1ABBHI
Health Assignment Help
Task:
One important part of using research is the ability to understand and appraise research. Appraising research incorporates understanding how research is conducted, critically appraising the study strengths and limitations, and understanding implications of the research.

In this assignment you are required to critically appraise two (2) peer-reviewed research articles, one involving quantitative and one involving qualitative research. Your papers are as follows:

Guilcher, S, Hamilton-Wright, S, Skinner, W, Woodhall-Melnik, J, Ferentzy, P, Wendaferew, A, Hwang, S & Matheson, F 2016, ‘“Talk with me”: perspectives on services for men with problem gambling and housing instability’,
BMC Health Services Research,
vol. 16, pp. 340.
Weetra, D, Glover, K, Buckskin, M, Ah Kit, J, Leane, C, Mitchell, A, Stuart-Butler, D, Turner, M, Yelland, J, Gartland, D & Brown, S 2016, ‘Stressful events, social health issues and psychological distress in Aboriginal women having a baby in South Australia: implications for antenatal care’,
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
, vol. 16, pp. 1-12.

You will need to
:

Retrieve the two research articles specified above from the Deakin library database.

Read the articles and make sure you understand the content, argument, vocabulary etc. Use the resources from this unit to help you discuss relevant research principles and terms relating to these two articles. Use the resources available through the Library website to develop your understanding and to find additional sources to support your analysis.

Identify the kind of study being reported in each of the two articles. Locate a critical appraisal tool for each article that is appropriate to the study type. Cite the source/s of the original tool and provide a brief explanation of why you selected the tool.

Use the appropriate critical appraisal tool to examine each article,
first noting answers
to the questions/items listed in the tool and then
synthesising your analysis
. This forms the main section of your written appraisal.
Include page numbers
from the research article in your answers to the appraisal tool (i.e. cross reference where in the research article you are finding the answers to the critical appraisal tool questions/items).
Use additional sources
to help evaluate issues of validity, representativeness etc.

Ensure that when you describe the various strengths and weaknesses of the article that you explain your analysis. For instance if the quantitative article had non-random sampling you will state that, and then explain what implications of this type of sampling. This will mean you also need to consult and cite relevant articles and books on research methods. By doing this you will be able to show the marker that you understand why the aspect you have noted is a strength or a limitation of the study you are analysing.

Use the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research (
https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/e72
) to describe the main ethical issues pertaining to each of the two studies and briefly discuss how they have been addressed.

Write a short summary of the implications of each study’s findings for practice, recognising the strength or quality of the findings from the articles.

The HSH725:  Health Assignment above question has been solved by our Health experts at TVAssignmentHelp. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services