Help In 1250 Words Paper

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I need help with a Business question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

While servant leadership is often associated with Christianity and the Bible, one could argue that it is compatible with most religions and philosophies and that it transcends cultures. This assignment presents you with an opportunity to explore other cultures, philosophies, and religions and asks you to think critically about how servant leadership practices are apparent in other religions and cultures.

Select one cultural context. Also select one religious viewpoint. You may not select Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, or Christianity, including any of its denominations or traditions such as Eastern Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism.

Examine how the principles of servant leadership are evident in that chosen culture and in that chosen religion. In an essay (1,250-1,500 words), identify similarities and differences between servant leadership’s philosophies and the values evident in the selected cultural context and religious viewpoint. Be sure to provide specific examples of practices and/or values in your discussion.

You are required to locate a total of four articles that address servant leadership in your chosen cultural context and religious viewpoint. Two of the articles should examine servant leadership from a different cultural perspective and two articles should examine servant leadership from a different religious perspective. Be sure to select academic articles from reputable sources that are 10-20 pages in length. Include information from the articles in your discussion.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.What is your take/stance on passing an English course without having enough language and grammar skills? Include at-least three references: nursing essay help
I’m studying for my English class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

What is your take/stance on passing an English course without having enough language and grammar skills? Include at-least three references.
ntroduction
The introduction is well-structured. a hook statement and a good thesis statement are included.

20points

The introduction is structured well with the thesis statement with minor missing details.

15points

The introduction is included with a thesis statement along with major errors.

7points

The introduction is not found.

0points
Supporting Paragraph1
The author makes a compelling argument about how the essay works argumentatively. Content is clearly stated. All supporting topic/point is clearly stated and discussed as stated in the thesis statement. The word count/presentation length is adequate. Analytic claims are supported with evidence from the text (and possibly, context). Each piece of evidence is examined closely, as the author moves through a critical analysis that offers a specific reading of the text.

15points

The author makes an argument about how the essay works argumentatively. Content is clearly stated. However, all topics are not discussed. The author provides textual (and perhaps, contextual) evidence that support the claim. However, argument is not convincing because either the author has not provided enough evidence to support his/her points/claims or the author has failed to demonstrate the connection between evidences and claims.

12points

The author’s argument is either not argumentative in nature or is not debatable. The author may provide some textual evidence. However, parts of the “argument” are not convincing.

7points

The author makes no claims about how the essay works argumentatively. The content of the supporting paragraph is unclear. The topic sentences are not clearly stated. Word count/ presentation length not met.

0points
Supporting Paragraph 2
The author makes a compelling argument about how the essay works argumentatively. Content is clearly stated. All supporting topic/point is clearly stated and discussed as stated in the thesis statement. The word count/presentation length is adequate. Analytic claims are supported with evidence from the text (and possibly, context). Each piece of evidence is examined closely, as the author moves through a critical analysis that offers a specific reading of the text.

15points

The author makes an argument about how the essay works argumentatively. Content is clearly stated. However, all topics are not discussed. The author provides textual (and perhaps, contextual) evidence that support the claim. However, argument is not convincing because either the author has not provided enough evidence to support his/her points/claims or the author has failed to demonstrate the connections between evidences and claims.

12points

The author’s argument is either not argumentative in nature or is not debatable. The author may provide some textual evidence. However, parts of the “argument” are not convincing.

7points

The author makes no claims about how the essay works argumentatively. The content of the supporting paragraph is unclear. The topic sentences are not clearly stated. Word count/ presentation length not met.

0points
Supporting Paragraph 3
The author makes a compelling argument about how the essay works argumentatively. Content is clearly stated. All supporting topic/point is clearly stated and discussed as stated in the thesis statement. The word count/presentation length is adequate. Analytic claims are supported with evidence from the text (and possibly, context). Each piece of evidence is examined closely, as the author moves through a critical analysis that offers a specific reading of the text.

15points

The author makes an argument about how the essay works argumentatively. Content is clearly stated. However, all topics are not discussed. The author provides textual (and perhaps, contextual) evidence that support the claim. However, argument is not convincing because either the author has not provided enough evidence to support his/her points/claims or the author has failed to demonstrate the connections between evidences and claims.

12points

The author’s argument is either not argumentative in nature or is not debatable. The author may provide some textual evidence. However, parts of the “argument” are not convincing.

7points

The author makes no claims about how the essay works argumentatively. The content of the supporting paragraph is unclear. The topic sentences are not clearly stated. Word count/ presentation length not met.

0points
Conclusion
Conclusion is well structured. Recommendation is given by the author.

15points

Conclusion is present, but part of the information is missing.

12points

Conclusion is structured with lack of precision and recommendation.

7points

Conclusion is not included.

0points
APA format/style
The author follows an APA format, Title page, headings, and reference page are included per APA format. Essay references 3 well-chosen sources, which are scholarly/peer-reviewed journal article. In-text citations and reference list are complete and correct according to APA guidelines

10points

The author follows an APA format and includes title page, headings, and reference page, but there are minor mistakes. Essay references fewer than 3 relevant sources, one of which is a scholarly/peer-reviewed journal article. In-text citations and reference list follow APA guidelines, with few major errors.

7points

The author encounters major mistakes in following an APA format. More than one items (title, headings, and reference page are missing. Essay references fewer than 2 sources and/or does not include a scholarly/peer-reviewed journal article. In-text citations and reference list contain numerous errors in APA style. One missing/incorrect in-text citation and/or reference.

4points

Essay references are not included and if they are included and none of them are scholarly/peer-reviewed journal article. Missing in-text citations and/or reference list.

0points
Grammar and Writing mechanics
The writing is appropriately academic in tone/style and is virtually free of grammatical and mechanical errors.

10points

The writing is academic in style and contains only a few grammatical and mechanical errors.

7points

The writing style may not be appropriate to academic contexts; it contains numerous, repeated errors.

4points

The writing style is inappropriate and full of distracting errors

0pointsI need a one page paper with all of the highlighted items below
Help me study for my Management class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

First,

Look at the complete paper for the group and then
Review the Presentation – Part 6-Module 8 “Monitor, Control & Adjust Plan Components, Strategy and/or Process.”
Then,
Write a 1-page (approximate 300 words) description of what your group determines as the way it will monitor and control the process and results of your strategic planning effort.
Provide your rationale as to why I included specific elements within your monitoring/controlling approach. Discuss what risks or issues (e.g. management, stakeholder, logistics, resources) might impact the implementation process or results of my plan, and State how I would manage these potential derailers if my monitoring indicated the likelihood of their occurrence.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services