For Your Initial Post This Week, For The Article Provided Down Below Answer The Following Questions.

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m trying to study for my Psychology course and I need some help to understand this question.

For your initial post this week, for the article provided down below answer the following questions.
A summary of the article. The summary should briefly highlight 2-4 major points of the article, including major conclusions related to the topic or issue covered in the article. Reflection and Critical Analysis: Provide a critical analysis and review of the article and topics covered within the article. Some issues to cover include:
Is the article based on actual research (was a study conducted)?
If so, what are the strengths and weaknesses of the study?

If not, what are the limitations of the author’s conclusions and discussion without scientific evidence to support their views and analysis?
What are counter-viewpoints or theories to the authors’ discussion and analysis? Do you agree with the authors’ views / analysis and explain why or why not? How does the article relate to our understanding of men in everyday life? Finally, develop one thought provoking question for the class to respond to based on the summary and critical analysis of the article and its topic.
Article screenshots are attached belowArgumentative Essay Rough Draft: nursing case study help
I’m working on a English exercise and need support.

Interpret information through close and critical reading. Demonstrate effective use of the writing process. Employ effective academic tone, style, mechanics, and citation method. Integrate relevant source material effectively and ethically. Support a position appropriate to the rhetorical situation.
You will submit a 4- to 5-page (1,000 to 1,250 words) rough-draft essay that is formatted in proper APA style. This rough draft assignment must integrate prior feedback and show improvement from your prior coursework. The rough draft will be evaluated differently than a final draft essay, so pay close attention to the grading rubrics and requirements.

Your argument should be sound, valid, and based upon evidence from at least 5 credible sources. At least 3 of your sources must be scholarly. You may integrate additional information, since your final draft requires additional research. Information and evidence must be integrated appropriately, cited in APA-style, and used with integrity. Remember to draft your essay for an academic audience.

This is the feedback I received:
( 1.76 / 2.00) Argument Development
Proficient – Most claims are developed through logical reasoning and/or based on credible evidence from the minimum number of sources required. Argument is fairly cohesive, complete, and relevant to the research question.
Comments:

You did well in developing most of your claims. Your argument demonstrates that you are building an understanding of the research question. There are a few places where the connection between your claims and the supporting evidence is not fully explained. Review your marked-up paper for specific suggestions that you can apply to your rough draft.

This is the grading rubric:
Argument Development
Total: 3.40

Distinguished – Claims are supported by logical reasoning and credible evidence from at least the minimum number of sources required. Argument has a well-developed foundation.

Proficient – Most claims are supported by logical reasoning and/or credible evidence from the minimum number of sources required. Argument has a well-developed foundation.

Basic – Many claims are supported by logical reasoning and/or credible evidence from an adequate number of sources. Argument is identifiable but may not be well-developed.

Below Expectations – Few or no claims are supported by logical reasoning and/or credible evidence from an adequate number of sources. Argument is difficult to identify and underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The argument development is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Rhetorical Development
Total: 2.30

Distinguished – Voice is appropriate for the situation. Argument is tailored to an academic audience.

Proficient – Academic voice is developing. Argument is appropriate for an academic audience.

Basic – Academic voice is emerging. Argument may be more appropriate for a non-academic audience.

Below Expectations – Academic voice is not apparent. Argument is not suited to an academic audience.

Non-Performance – The rhetorical development is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication
Total: 2.30

Distinguished – Document is organized, well-structured, and meets length requirements. Font, margins, spacing, title block, headers, and other elements are consistent with the required style guide. Writing is clear, correct, and easy to read.

Proficient – Document shows some organization, is properly structured, and meets length requirements. Font, margins, spacing, title block, headers, and other elements are mostly consistent with the required style guide. Writing has the potential to be clear, correct, and easy to read after revision and editing.

Basic – Document may have some organizational and structure issues and/or nearly meets the length requirement. Font, margins, spacing, title block, headers, and other elements may not be consistent with the required style guide. Writing may be somewhat unclear, incorrect, and/or difficult to read and requires focused revision and editing.

Below Expectations – Document is not well organized, lacks proper structure, and/or does not meet the length requirement. Font, margins, spacing, title block, headers, and other elements may not be consistent with the required style guide. Writing may be unclear, incorrect, and/or difficult to read and requires extensive revision and editing. Use of the style guide is a requirement in all future assignments.

Non-Performance – The rough draft is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Academic Honesty & Source Integration
Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Written work appears to be original. Sources are expertly integrated and cited accurately.

Proficient – Written work appears to be original. Sources are properly integrated and cited appropriately. Minor errors in citations exist.

Basic – Written work appears to be original. Sources are integrated with an attempt at accurate citation. Relevant errors in citations exist.

Below Expectations – Written work appears to contain some unoriginal writing. Sources may be used without proper integration and/or citation.

Non-Performance – The ethical integration of sources is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Essay Topic:

Increase Internet usage and its effect in communities since 1980Please submit a 500 word write-up (12 font/double spaced) based on your visit to the mission and the audio recording. Do not hesitate to include your own perspective/opinions on what you see, as well as what you hear.
I’m working on a History exercise and need support.

Extra Credit

This extra credit assignment will require you visiting San Diego de Alcala (or any other mission of your preference: San Juan Capistrano, Oceanside, Santa Barbara, etc.) and listening to a podcast (link will be attached). The missions throughout California provide an excellent opportunity to see first hand, some of the important themes and architecture relevant to American/European/Latin American/ California history. There is a museum exhibition in each compound with some excellent artifacts, in addition to other parts of the mission that are historically rich.

Questions to keep in mind: Do you find any of these works/exhibitions particularly interesting? Why, or why not? What did you learn about mission history, California history, colonial history, and American history. How does what you learned, and information you gather from the mission visit contrast with the Cross of Thorns podcast. That means you have to give that podcast a thorough and full listen I hope you enjoy yourself at the mission, learning its history and taking the time to think about the period in which some of these complexes were created. Think of the central motives as to why they were built up the California coast, and the rest of Alta California. Do any of the events discussed either at the mission or in the podcast question your assumption of what you thought mission history was all about? Would you change anything about the exhibition or pieces on display? Why or why not?

Please submit a 500 word write-up (12 font/double spaced) based on your visit to the mission and the audio recording. Do not hesitate to include your own perspective/opinions on what you see, as well as what you hear. I would recommend

listening to the audio before your visit. What historical information could we gather from these works of art/architecture. Does the mission tell us anything about California history, or give us insight into a much bigger history. Please include specific information pertaining to what is on view. Please share a pic/selfie confirming you were there.

This deadline for this extra credit assignment is April 3 (By 10:00PM). You could submit it sooner if you would like. It is not a shared document and others will not be able to see your work- Depending on the quality and effort of the work submitted, points range from 1-10

LINK:https://www.kalw.org/post/your-call-dark-history-c…Discussion 5: Compare
Can you help me understand this Law question?

The following is a link to a reading (and video) on the three core actors in the criminal justice system: Actors

SUMMARIZE each of respective roles of the three core actors in the criminal justice system- the police, courts, and corrections- in the influence of law and public policy.

COMPOSE a persuasive paragraph, after selecting one of the three actors, to argue that your selected actor has the most influence over law and public policy.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services