Final Project Final Project Criteria Ratings Pts Content view longer description

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Final Project
Final Project
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content
view longer description
55 pts
Excellent
A well thought out response given based on the prompt. The response includes an excellent 1) introduction, 2) description of the chosen group, 3) discussion of the chosen theoretical perspective, 4) application of the chosen theoretical perspective, 5) examination of how the chosen group compares to society as a whole, and 6) a conclusion.
45 pts
Good
A well thought out response given based on the prompt. The response includes a good 1) introduction, 2) description of the chosen group, 3) discussion of the chosen theoretical perspective, 4) application of the chosen theoretical perspective, 5) examination of how the chosen group compares to society as a whole, and 6) a conclusion. However, one or two of these required sections may be weak.
35 pts
Unsatisfactory
A partially thought out response given based on the prompt. The response includes an 1) introduction, 2) description of the chosen group, 3) discussion of the chosen theoretical perspective, 4) application of the chosen theoretical perspective, 5) examination of how the chosen group compares to society as a whole, and 6) a conclusion. However, three or four of these required sections may be weak.
25 pts
Needs Work
An insufficient response given based on the prompt. The response includes an 1) introduction, 2) description of the chosen group, 3) discussion of the chosen theoretical perspective, 4) application of the chosen theoretical perspective, 5) examination of how the chosen group compares to society as a whole, and 6) a conclusion. However, all these required sections may be weak or one or two of these sections is missing completely.
0 pts
No Marks
/ 55 pts
Reputable Sources
view longer description
10 pts
Excellent
The project includes at least 4 reputable sources.
8 pts
Good
The project includes at least 4 sources, but one of them is not from a reputable source.
6 pts
Unsatisfactory
The project includes at least 4 sources, but two of them are not from a reputable source.
4 pts
Needs Work
The project includes at least 4 sources, but three of them are not from a reputable source.
0 pts
No Marks
/ 10 pts
Images
view longer description
10 pts
Excellent
For a text submission, 3–5 images are included that highlight concepts/examples in the paper. For a PowerPoint, images are shown to highlight what is being talked about.
8 pts
Good
For a text submission, 3 images are included, but 1 of the images may not be related to the topic. For a PowerPoint, images are shown to highlight what is being talked about, but there are a few instances of too much text on particular slides or too many images not relating to what is being talked about.
6 pts
Unsatisfactory
For a text submission, 3 images are included, but 2 of the images may not be related to the topic. For a PowerPoint, images are shown to highlight what is being talked about, but there are several instances of too much text on particular slides or too many images not relating to what is being talked about.
4 pts
Needs Work
For a text submission, 3 images are included, but the images do not relate to the topic. For a PowerPoint, images are shown to highlight what is being talked about, but there is too much text on the slides or to many images not relating to what is being talked about.
0 pts
No Marks
/ 10 pts
Writing or Presentation Rules
view longer description
10 pts
Excellent
For a text submission—The following are met: 1) Writing is clear and free from grammatical and spelling errors. 2) The response uses conventional college writing style with complete sentences and paragraphs. 3) Paper meets expected length. 4) Tone of the paper is respectful and could promote collegial discussion. For a PowerPoint submission—The following are met: (1) The presentation is free from major grammatical errors. 2) The presentation is free of major audio problems that impede the understanding of the speaker. 3) The presentation meets the expected length. 4) The presentation’s tone is respects and could promote collegial discussion.
8 pts
Good
For a text submission, 3 images are included, but 1 of the images may not be related to the topic. For a text submission—Three of the following are met: 1) Writing is clear and free from grammatical and spelling errors. 2) The response uses conventional college writing style with complete sentences and paragraphs. 3) Paper meets expected length. 4) Tone of the paper is respectful and could promote collegial discussion. For a PowerPoint submission—Three of the following are met: (1) The presentation is free from major grammatical errors. 2) The presentation is free of major audio problems that impede the understanding of the speaker. 3) The presentation meets the expected length. 4) The presentation’s tone is respects and could promote collegial discussion.
6 pts
Unsatisfactory
For a text submission—Two of the following are met: 1) Writing is clear and free from grammatical and spelling errors. 2) The response uses conventional college writing style with complete sentences and paragraphs. 3) Paper meets expected length. 4) Tone of the paper is respectful and could promote collegial discussion. For a PowerPoint submission—Two of the following are met: (1) The presentation is free from major grammatical errors. 2) The presentation is free of major audio problems that impede the understanding of the speaker. 3) The presentation meets the expected length. 4) The presentation’s tone is respects and could promote collegial discussion.
4 pts
Needs Work
For a text submission—One of the following is met: 1) Writing is clear and free from grammatical and spelling errors. 2) The response uses conventional college writing style with complete sentences and paragraphs. 3) Paper meets expected length. 4) Tone of the paper is respectful and could promote collegial discussion. For a PowerPoint submission—One of the following is met: (1) The presentation is free from major grammatical errors. 2) The presentation is free of major audio problems that impede the understanding of the speaker. 3) The presentation meets the expected length. 4) The presentation’s tone is respects and could promote collegial discussion.
0 pts
No Marks
/ 10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDepth of Reasoning
view longer description
threshold: 3
4 pts
Exceeds Mastery
3 pts
Mastery
2 pts
Near Mastery
1 pts
Below Mastery
0 pts
No Evidence
/ 4 pts
Total Points: 0

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services