Final Paper!!!!

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m trying to learn for my Psychology class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Social Psychology: Final Paper Guidelines

You are responsible for analyzing an academic research article. You will choose one of the articles provided, read through it (multiple times) and address the items listed. Please review the resources on how to read a journal article, especially if you are unfamiliar with doing so. They are material that generally should be read more than once to get a good understanding and in order to be able to provide a thoughtful critique.

Please review the material below carefully. Your paper must include the following components. Point values for each are provided. Each component should be discussed in a separate subsection of your paper. Highlight the transition from one section to the next using the appropriate APA style level 2 subheading.
Paper components
Topic of Study (2pts)
Provide a brief overview of the topic for your study Identify the research questions they are trying to answer and the specific hypothesis, that is, what is their prediction about what they will find?
Who are the participants? (2pts)
Describe briefly and in your own words who participated in the study. Outline their basic characteristics and if you can, explain where the researcher found their sample and why they were selected.
What happened? (5pts)
Describe how the research was conducted. Summarize the procedure in your own words. You should also include information about
The type of study it was (experiment, correlational design, descriptive study) The specific variables that were either manipulated or measured and briefly, how this was done.
Conclusion (3 pts)
Explain briefly what the researchers found Describe the findings in your own words and make sure to report whether the results were consistent or inconsistent with the research hypothesis
Critical Analysis (5 pts)
Think about the article and the study and provide a critique. Some items you might consider:
Do you see any problems with the way the study was conducted? Do you think there were any biases that might impact the findings? Do you think that the findings of this article are useful for explaining behavior in the real world? why or why not?
Follow-up study (5 pts)
Regardless of what type of study you analyze, you need to propose a follow-up EXPERIMENT. Think about what wasn’t explained by the research or what the logical “next step” might be. You should explain briefly
What your independent variable will be and how it will be manipulated What you dependent variable will be and how it will be measured How the study would be carried out Why the study should be carried out – justify why this would be a useful study to conduct.
APA style citation (3 pts)
Make sure to review the material linked on Canvas to format your citation correctly
Additional details:
Your article should be chosen from those available on Canvas. If you wish to use a different article, you MUST obtain approval from the instructor prior to completing your paper. You are NOT writing a full APA-style paper, rather you are incorporating APA style into this assignment. You do NOT need to include a cover page. (See below for a sample of the formatting.) The length of the paper should be roughly 4 pages, using a normal font size, double-spacing and regular margins. Note, I am less concerned about length and more concerned about quality. Papers will be graded based on whether or not the appropriate information is included as well as on the clarity of your communication. Please make sure that you re-read and proof-read your paper before submitting it. Don’t forget to include an APA style citation of the article being analyzed at the end of your paper. Papers are due by Thursday 7.30.20 at 11:59:00 PM PST. Late paper will not be accepted for any reason.
Sample formatting
My Name

Psy 138 – Final Paper

Due Date

Research Article Review

Topic of Study

This is where you briefly describe the topic of the research article. You need to also include the author(s)’ hypothesis/hypotheses in this section.

Who?

This is where you describe the sample, in your own words. Do NOT copy from the article itself. If the researchers picked a specific set of participants for a specific reason, note it here.

What?

This is where you describe the research methodology in your own words. Make sure to highlight what type of research design was being used. If it is an experiment, identify the IV(s) and DV(s) and how they were manipulated or measured. For other designs, make sure to include information about the variables being measured. Make sure to summarize – don’t include all the details in the actual method section. Include an overview of the procedure, highlighting the main variables and procedural elements.

Conclusions

This is where you describe the results, in your own words. Do not include numerical values from the article. Write the findings in words, your own words. What did they find and was it consistent with what they expected?

Critical Analysis

This is an important section – demonstrate your critical thinking skills by critiquing the article. There are several items you might consider listed in the table above. In order to earn full credit, you need to not just list items but explain your ideas. Also, your critique needs to be more than just criticizing the participants in the study. That does not demonstrate a high level of critical analysis.

Follow-up Study

This is also an important section. In this section, you need to describe a follow-up study to the one in your article. Think about what might be an additional study that could shed more light on the topic. Avoid saying that you would do the same study again just with different participants. This will not earn you any points. Your follow-up study needs to be original but related to the same topic. Explain exactly what you would do, highlighting the IV and how you would manipulated it and the DV(s) and how you would measure them. Also, explain your reasoning for doing the study – why would it be a useful study to do? What would you expect to find?

*****Then, on a separate page at the end of your paper, you must include the APA-style citation.4 Assignments: nursing assignment help services
I’m trying to learn for my Business class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Week 7 Assignment – Research Paper
DUE: Feb 23, 2020 11:59 PM
Attachments checked for originality? Yes
Assignment Instructions
In a 750-1,000 words Microsoft Word document in APA (6.0) format, respond to the following questions. You must include at least three outside references (in addition to the textbook). Ensure your essay has a title and reference page formatted in APA.
What role do financial institutions play within the global marketplace? How can policies and regulations impact financial institutions? What role does the central banking system play within the global marketplace? Would you recommend any changes to the central banking system? Why or why not?
Refer to the Writing Assignment Grading Guidelines below for assignment requirements in content, organization, writing style, grammar and APA 6.0 format.

Your paper will be automatically submitted to Turnitin in the assignment dropbox. Originality reports will be returned to the faculty and student. Multiple submissions are allowed. For full credit, make sure that your Similarity Index does not exceed 20%. Refer to the following links for APA guidelines.

APA Style

Purdue OWL

Guidelines

Writing Assignment Requirements

Content(60%)
Response demonstrates a clear understanding of the key elements of assignment questions. Response thoroughly covers the elements in a substantive manner. Response demonstrates critical thinking and analysis. Content is complete and accurate. Introduction and conclusion provide adequate information on the given topic.
Organization(20%)
Paper structure is clear and easy to follow. Ideas flow in a logical sequence. Introduction provides a sound introduction to the topic and previews major points. Paragraph transitions are logical and support the flow of thought throughout the paper. The conclusion thoroughly reviews the major points.
Writing Style,Grammar, APA Format(20%)
Sentences are well constructed, complete, clear, and concise. Words used are specific and unambiguous. The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are correct. APA guidelines (6th edition) are followed, such as headers, citations, references, etc. Effective use of aids, such as sections, summaries, table of contents, indices, and appendices (if appropriate)
Supporting Materials
APA_6th_Edition_Template+2015.doc (30 KB)

Issue Analysis 2 (wk 4)

DUE: Feb 2, 2020 11:59 PM

Assignment Details

Attachments checked for originality?

Yes
Top of Form

Assignment Instructions

This week you are asked to write a critical literature review of between 7-9 pages covering the points below.

As you have seen in the lesson and your readings, there is a great deal of current consternation about the size of the U.S. federal budget deficit and what to do about it. Review the literature and, as you do so, make sure you cover the key arguments surrounding the issue. Draw your points from the scholarly literature dealing with past federal administrations as well as contemporary writings in current affairs. Then conclude with a section summarizing the literature you have reviewed that also develops your own argument for what you consider to be the best policy response you have reviewed and why. Include up-to-date statistics and other evidence you find in primary government (and other) sources to support your argument and ground your policy modifications.

Use at least 5 peer-reviewed journal articles and at least 10 other resources. You can draw some of these from your supplementary reading list and the links/references in the lesson. However, supplement these further with independent research, particularly government websites. Please cite all sources perfectly in APA style.

This site gives some extremely useful instruction hands-on on how to write a good literature review. You will find several short literature reviews here, broken down sentence-by-sentence with a clear explanation of exactly what each sentence is attempting to do/achieve in the review. It even highlights in bold text the kind of language and phrases you will find in all good literature reviews from Master’s level, to Ph.D. to journal articles. The journal articles you review will almost certainly also have a literature review section you can evaluate and emulate too. If you need more information on how to research for, compile structure, and write an excellent postgraduate-level literature review, you are almost guaranteed to find what you are looking for in this detailed guide. This assignment, and the research you do on literature review writing for it, will provide some excellent preparation for when you come to write your Capstone Thesis.

The criteria for evaluating this issue analysis is based on the Graduate Assignment Rubric, which can be found in the irubric icon.

Midterm Exam

DUE: Feb 2, 2020 11:59 PM

Assignment Details

Attachments checked for originality?

Yes
Top of Form

Assignment Instructions

The following 5 questions are your midterm exam. Please follow 6th edition APA format including ample research. It is recommend that you aim for 2-3 paragraphs per question and use each question as a heading so that the paper is organized. Deliverable length: 5 page minimum,

Question 1:

Define what is meant by “brand equity” and discuss what a company can do to maintain brand equity.

Question 2:

Discuss the Product Life Cycle Concept and include the relative amounts of sales and profit during each stage.

Question 3:

How are innovations in interactive television and online services expanding the strategies and tactics marketers employ today?

Question 4:

What are some of the personal and business-related privacy issues associated with the growth in database marketing and how should they be addressed?

Question 5:

Define direct marketing and give some real world examples.

‘lastnamefirstinitial-MKTG600-assignment#

Course Objectives:
Develop a Marketing Plan. Define the types of marketing research. Analyze potential pricing alternatives. Define channel strategy Design a sales management plan. Define the process for bringing a new product or service to market.

Issue Analysis 3 (wk 6)
DUE: Feb 16, 2020 11:59 PM
Grade Details
Attachments checked for originality? Yes
Assignment Instructions
This week you are asked to develop your analytic response to the following questions in a multimedia project using Knovio or Prezi.

What does your state budget look like? Where do your state revenues originate? What are the expenditures? How does this compare to the federal budget?

Your analysis should be formally presented as a multimedia presentation. Substantively, it should first identify your state and the key figures/policy areas/time period(s) you will be looking at. Then it should cover the major policy concepts and how they apply to the budget, identify the key stakeholders, and review the development and implementation of the budget. Zoom in on taxation strategies (state personal income tax, state sales taxes and any other tax issues you feel are important) and major expenditures. Include a portion of a project where you evaluate the effectiveness of the policy and its ability to meet stated goals. Also include a critical comment on how well you think the key elements of the budget follow the economic principle of equity. Finally, offer some carefully considered recommendations for improving or modifying the policy. Situate your analysis in the contemporary policy literature where you can and include appropriate citations in APA style. The final part of your project should therefore contain a perfect APA-style bibliography.

The criteria for evaluating this issue analysis is based on the Graduate Assignment Rubric, which can be found in the iRubric icon.Aviation legislation paper revised
Can you help me understand this Law question?

(irrelevant)

2. Discussion.

Summary judgment is appropriate when “based upon the pleadings, affidavits, and depositions, `there is no genuine issue as to any material fact,’ and where `the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’” FDIC v. Anchor Properties, 13 F.3d 27, 30 (1st Cir. 1994), quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c) and citing Gaskell v. Harvard Co-Op Soc’y, 3 F.3d 495, 497 (1st Cir.1993).[1]

a. Negligence.

The plaintiffs have shown (a) that Mrs. Lamkin was burned by hot coffee *32 served by Braniff and (b) that a defective machine was removed the next day. The question thus raised is whether the plaintiffs have shown enough to support a finding by a factfinder that Braniff was negligent. The Court concludes that they have not.

The plaintiffs have failed to offer any evidence that Braniff knew or should have known that there was a defect in the coffeemaker which would cause it to brew extremely hot coffee. Indeed, the plaintiffs have not even shown that there was a defect in the coffeemaker that caused it to brew extremely hot coffee. The plaintiffs have not offered any evidence to show that Braniff or any of its employees knew or should have known that the coffee which was actually served to Mrs. Lamkin was extremely hot.[2] In short, the plaintiffs have simply failed to offer any evidence which would support a finding of negligence.

The plaintiffs cannot prevail on their failure to warn claim because Mrs. Lamkin was aware that the coffee was hot. The complaint states that “Helen Lamkin set the coffee upon a folding shelf attached to the seat in front of her to allow the coffee to cool before she drank it.” (emphasis added) One needs no warning if he or she is aware of the danger as to which a warning would apply. Colter v. Barber-Greene Co., 403 Mass. 50, 525 N.E.2d 1305, 1312 (1988). Moreover, the plaintiffs have not shown that any Braniff employees were aware that the coffee was hot enough to burn Mrs. Lamkin; i.e., that any Braniff employees knew or should have known that there was anything unusual about which Mrs. Lamkin should have been warned.

In addition, the plaintiffs have not offered any evidence to suggest that the flight attendants on her flight acted negligently with respect to Mrs. Lamkin’s care after the coffee spilled. The plaintiffs have also failed to show how any behavior of the flight attendants after the coffee spilled exacerbated her injury. Finally, the plaintiffs have not offered any evidence as to how the seats, seat trays or cups were defective.

The preceding discussion effectively resolves this case. However, the plaintiffs raised two issues at the hearing on this motion which the court will also address.

b. Common Carrier

At the very end of hearing on this motion, after the parties had been heard at length, the plaintiffs raised for the first time the argument that a higher standard of care applies to Braniff as a common carrier. The Court, in its discretion, will address this issue.[3]

Braniff, as a common carrier, is subject to a high standard of care. The Supreme *33 Judicial Court of Massachusetts has stated that “the standard to which common carriers are held is the very highest, approaching that of an insurer.” Worcester Ins. Co. v. Fells Acre Day School, Inc., 408 Mass. 393, 558 N.E.2d 958, 968 (1990). See O’Malley v. Putnam Safe Deposit Vaults, Inc., 17 Mass.App. 332, 458 N.E.2d 752, 758 (1983). But while the standard may “approach” that of an insurer, the Supreme Judicial Court has not gone so far as to rule that a common carrier is in fact strictly liable for accidents which befall its passengers. The court has stated that “the carrier is not an insurer of the safety of its passengers, nor is it obliged by law to foresee and to guard against unlikely dangers and improbable harms.” Quigley v. Wilson Line of Massachusetts, 338 Mass. 125, 154 N.E.2d 77, 79 (1958). See Holton v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., 303 Mass. 242, 21 N.E.2d 251, 251 (1939); Intriligator v. Goldberg, 299 Mass. 333, 12 N.E.2d 730, 731 (1938). None of the Supreme Judicial Court’s decisions has altered Massachusetts law to the effect that, in general, the mere occurrence of an accident by itself will not support a finding of negligence. Holton, 21 N.E.2d at 251; Wilson v. Colonial Air Transport, 278 Mass. 420, 180 N.E. 212, 214 (1932). The common carrier standard of care, thus, cannot parlay the plaintiff’s mishap into liability for negligence in the absence of some proof other than that an accident happened.

c. Res Ipsa Loquitor.

At the hearing on this motion, but not in their brief, the plaintiffs suggested that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur would allow this case to go to a jury. Again, the Court, in its discretion, will review the law concerning this claim.

The doctrine of res ipsa loquitor “permits a trier of fact to draw an inference of negligence in the absence of a finding of a specific cause of the occurrence when an accident is of the kind that does not ordinarily happen unless the defendant was negligent in some respect and other responsible causes including conduct of the plaintiff, are sufficiently eliminated by the evidence.” Enrich v. Windmere Corp., 416 Mass. 83, 616 N.E.2d 1081, 1085 (1993). See Wilson v. Honeywell, Inc., 409 Mass. 803, 569 N.E.2d 1011, 1013 (1991). In res ipsa loquitor cases, “the jury must be able to find, either by expert evidence or by their own common knowledge, that the mere occurrence of the accident shows negligence as a cause.” Enrich, 616 N.E.2d at 1085.

Neither the plaintiffs’ expert nor common knowledge supports a finding that the mere occurrence of this accident shows negligence. Mr. Chapdelaine, the expert offered by the plaintiff, by self-acknowledgement is not qualified to testify as to the cause of the accident. He has no particular expertise regarding the proper functioning and maintenance of a coffee machine. As noted above, he admitted that he has no specialized knowledge which would permit him to render an opinion on the proper temperature at which coffee should be served on an airplane. Nor does Mr. Chapdelaine have any expertise regarding the procedure for in-flight service. See Enrich, 616 N.E.2d at 1085.

Moreover, the Court is not persuaded that a jury may reasonably infer negligence from their general knowledge of practical affairs merely because a passenger is burned by hot coffee. A jury would have no way of knowing whether the coffee served to the plaintiff was hotter than coffee customarily served on airplanes or in places of public accommodation. See Huppe, 497 N.Y.S.2d at 308. Thus, a conclusion that the brewing of extremely hot coffee was due to negligence would be based on speculation and guesswork.

Because the plaintiffs have failed to submit sufficient evidence to allow a jury to conclude that Braniff acted negligently, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.

SO ORDERED.The Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground Laws
I’m studying for my Law class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

Week 4 Discussion

“The Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground Laws” Please respond to the following:
From the e-Activity, specify the key reasons why legislatures modified the castle doctrine. Select an article within the past three years where either the castle doctrine or the stand your ground law was used as a defense and discuss whether or not you agree or disagree with the use of the defense by the assailant. Provide a rationale to support your response and respond to no less than one of your peers.Answer the questions: nursing homework help
I need support with this Psychology question so I can learn better.

1. Based on the files and chapter 11 in the text book below, answer all the questions (500 words):

What can be done to minimize the immediate effects of Acute Stress Disorder?

What can be done to ameliorate the long term effects of PTSD?

Are the strategies you proposed different, or the same? Why?

One thing that sometimes happens after a traumatic death, is that a family, or a community will build a spontaneous memorial. Sometimes the location is specific to the death (roadside), or sometimes it is a location which held a significant meaning to the community or family (school locker, park bench). There has long been debate about the function, practicality, and even safety of these memorials. For example, it is not uncommon here in Virginia for the Department of Transportation to leave some memorials indefinitely (such as a small marker), but elaborate displays are often removed after six months to a year (depending on the county, the location, and the size). What are some factors for or against such displays? Do you feel they should be left indefinitely? If not, what should we use the guide their removal or relocation?

2. Response to a classmate post which I will send later (100 words)

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services