Explain why you think this interpretation of society offers a path to understanding/resolving what Nietzsche believes is wrong with civilization.

Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

I want you to focus on Nietzsche’s ideas.
he raised valid points for his time but offered no solution. He felt religion, democracy, equal suffrage, socialism (equality), and Enlightenment ideals weakened people, stifled creativity, and created a mediocre world. As you read his section, which of his points do you feel were valid and why? Was there a solution or was the universe really irrational?
Second, consider which one of the following you feel provided a possible answer to civilization’s malaise: Pareto, Weber, Freud, Bergson, Sorel, or Durkheim. Explain why you think this interpretation of society offers a path to understanding/resolving what Nietzsche believes is wrong with civilization.
read Mencius, “Man’s Nature is Good” & Tzu, “Man’s Nature is Evil”
post two questions
EXAMPLE:
1-
If Tzu believed that we were born evil and needed to be taught through teachers how to be a gentleman then how can someone be “good” if we were the people who created these concepts?
2-
Mencius believed that education played an important role in social development. Its primary function was to develop the mind and strengthen the cardinal virtues such as benevolence, righteousness, respect for rites, and wisdom. He held that the human being was naturally good, that virtues were innate and simply needed cultivating. What are the other contributions of Mencius in the field of education?

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services