Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
I’m studying and need help with a Philosophy question to help me learn.
Writing Guide for Philosophy
Part 1:General Advice
Pattern for Each Exam Problem
You are comparing at least two philosophers.
two philosophers: Anselm The Ontological Argument – Aquinas The Existence of God
You will explain a concept or argument from each philosopher.
You should dedicate at least one full paragraph to each text. You should have at least one quote to support your discussion of each text.
You should conclude each of your essays with an overall judgment.
You should dedicate at least one full paragraph to your judgment. Was one of the arguments stronger than the other? Were both weak? Make sure you explain your judgment. It should connect back to the rest of your essay: judge a concept or argument that you have already explained in the main part of your essay.
Your Audience
Assume that your reader is familiar with the philosophers you are writing on. Do not provide general biographical details on the philosophers, such as birth date or how awesome they were. Your reader will presume that you are merely wasting space instead of examining an argument. DO NOT ASSUME your reader understands a quoted passage the same way that you do. Also, do not assume that your reader shares your beliefs, aside from the most obvious and boring facts (things like, the earth is the third planet from our sun).
Your exam SHOULD NOT …
look like you just typed up your notes; look like you typed it in one sitting; look like you have slapped two summaries from SparkNotes next to each other.
Can I use the word “I” in my writing?
Yes. It’s okay to express yourself from a first-personal perspective. But be sure to express your considered/informed judgments rather than merely your opinions. In other words, give reasons to support your beliefs rather than just sharing your beliefs as merely personal preferences.
Re-read what you write!
Think of how another person might question what you have written. You are doing philosophy when you add this additional layer of thought/reflection. For example, if you wrote something like: “Some people might disagree with this claim because [… ]. But I think this concern is wrong. Here’s why: […].” Effective use of quotes creates at least two voices within your essay. Effective reflection/questioning of what you have written adds a third voice.
The Big Picture
Remember: The overall goal of a philosophy essay is to present a persuasive argument to your audience. As you write your essays, don’t forget:
why the topic matters, who you are talking to, and what you’re trying to convince your audience to believe.
Part 2: The Process of Writing
How NOT to begin
Do not wait until you know exactly what you want to write and in what order you want to write it. Do not continually delete what you have written because it is not perfect. For example, wait to correct most grammar and punctuation issues until the final editing process. In the beginning of your essay, focus on developing the ideas rather than having everything exactly right.
How to begin
It might be helpful if you formulate your overall judgment on the topic. This is helpful when it focuses your attention on specific parts of the readings. Just remember that you are not married to the judgment: you can change your mind in the process of writing your essay.
If you are uncertain about your overall judgment of the topic, then start with #1. Writing is a messy process. Having a document of quotes and your explanation of the quotes allows you to re-arrange the ideas as you develop your essay.
Find an important passage from each philosopher for each of the listed questions. Re-type those passages into a document.
Keep the passages separate from each other. Focus on their individual meaning.
Explain each of the passages in your own words. Explain how the passages relate to each other.
Working with quoted passages
Main goal: Show that you have some in-depth understanding of the reading. To do this, you don’t have to summarize the entire reading. Pick parts that are the most interesting or problematic to you. Save the explanation of a quote until after you have presented the quote. Make your explanation of the quote at least as long as the quote itself.
If you don’t have much to say about a quote, then the quote probably isn’t important. … So find an important quote. Or use ellipses (…) to shorten a long passage.
Use the page numbers of our course readings.
Organize your thoughts
Use paragraphs! Short paragraph. Write your introduction after you have drafted your essay. The introduction should only give enough detail to prepare the reader for the rest of the essay. Don’t try to summarize every aspect of the essay. Give your reader a sense of your overall judgment/evaluation.
Is there a philosopher that you are strongly disagreeing with? Or maybe strongly agreeing with? In the introductory paragraph, do not try to justify your argument—that’s what the rest of the paper is for.
Good Intro
Short paragraph. Write your introduction after you have drafted your essay. The introduction should only give enough detail to prepare the reader for the rest of the essay. Don’t try to summarize every aspect of the essay. Give your reader a sense of your overall judgment/evaluation.
Is there a philosopher that you are strongly disagreeing with? Or maybe strongly agreeing with? In the introductory paragraph, do not try to justify your argument—that’s what the rest of the paper is for.GOVERNMENT class DISCUSSION BOARd: nursing coursework help
I need an explanation for this History question to help me study.
GOVERNMENT CLASS
THE DISCUSSION BOARD IS THE PICTURE .
THE INFORMATION BELOW IS HOW IT SHOULD BE DONE .
To get started with the discussion forums, first, click on the word “thread” to begin a new post. After your post, reply to one of your classmates by clicking on their discussion link and hitting the reply button.Discussion Board Participation- “Meet and Greet” and “Thought Sessions” (1 @ 40 Points and 2 @ 20 points each = 80 points) Read Carefully!You are required to participate in three online discussion board forums. The first “Meet and Greet” session, where you introduce yourself to the class, is worth 40 points. The other two are “thought sessions” that will be centered on a particular theme and are worth up to 20 points each (40 total points), depending on quality and length of the required posts. Participation in the thought sessions includes an initial posting by students specifically answering the question posed and at least one secondary post making a critical response to at least one other student’s post. The response to another student can indicate agreement or disagreement or other comment but must be substantive in explaining the reasons for the comments. The initial post and secondary response post will be weighted equally (up to 10 points each, for a total of 20 points) when grades are assigned. Therefore, to receive full credit for participation on each Thought Session, you must make two posts at a minimum, each post worth up to 10 points. The first post (your initial post) must respond to the original question, while the second post must respond to at least one of your classmate’s postings on the topic by the due date.Consider each post as a “micro” essay of several (two or more) thoughtful paragraphs including at least 5 or 6 sentences each. This is the bare minimum for any credit, however, and it does not guarantee full credit or even a passing grade. You may earn only minimal credit even if you meet this minimum quantity requirement, because quality is more important than quantity. However, any post consisting of less than 5 or 6 sentences in a single post will receive no credit at all. This applies to any reply posts as well as your initial post. Please check the Discussion guidelines and directions under Course Information tab. There you will find additional information, instructions, the grading rubric that will be used to score your posts, and examples of model posts from prior course participants who received full credit. Save your work before posting on discussion board. If for technical reasons your posts are lost, you can simply copy and paste your saved work to the discussion board again.Warning: For other students to have time to respond to your post, your initial must be made 48 hours before the due date. Because “thought Sessions” require an initial post and a response post by the due date, late discussion board postings cannot be accepted and will not be graded.response needed
I need an explanation for this Social Science question to help me study.
Please Respond to Ryan with a connection or suggestion. some resources are attached
Ryan
I have been involved in most of the process for an FBA and BIP, and I have two students with current behavior plans in place. The plans seem to work relatively well in terms of the accommodations, tracking, and reward systems. The students have improved some since there implementation as well. The part that I feel needs more follow through is the teaching of appropriate behaviors and coping skills. Both students have social-emotional minutes that are serviced by a social worker, but they do not meet often enough to see a change in the students’ use of strategies. I am actually taking a course on social-emotional strategies, so I plan to take time to work on this with the students myself.
I do have a student that may benefit from having an FBA and BIP added to his IEP. I have had to work on social skills and anger management with him since his transfer to our school, but he has recently escalated in terms of distracting behavior, defiance, and even some violence toward computer equipment. He has always reacted negatively to redirects but is now even shutting down some which was not previously occurring. I have not formally tracked his behavior but will likely start with an ABC form.