Describe The Letters/emails/memos Strength And Weakness In Terms Of The Following:

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m studying and need help with a English question to help me learn.

Describe the letters/emails/memos strength and weakness in terms of the following:

– format

– organization

– style

– identify the most effective and least effective correspondence, and explain why you picked the ones you picked.

– choose one correspondence and rewrite it so that it more effectively accomplished its goals.

500 words minimum

no plagiarism

check the files belowManaging a Project Schedule
I’m trying to study for my Management course and I need some help to understand this question.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you answer the following questions:
What differentiates a list of project requirements from a work breakdown structure (WBS)? What is the importance of developing a WBS to manage a project? How does the WBS contribute to the success of a project? Once the project schedule is finalized, what are the tools you can use to monitor the schedule? How do you handle resource overallocation? What are the advantages and disadvantages of fast-tracking a project?
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Database Management class, Responsibilities of Database Administrator: my nursing assignment help
I’m trying to study for my Computer Science course and I need some help to understand this question.

Hello,

Here are the instructions:

Complete the following:
Describe 5 responsibilities of a DBA and provide an example of each. Submit a document (1-2 pages) with your results. If you utilize external resources, cite them.
Here is the grading rubic:

MGMT 392 8.2 Module Exercises Rubric

MGMT 392 8.2 Module Exercises Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identification and Analysis of the Main Issues/Problem

30.0 pts Excellent (A) (27-30) Identifies and understands all of the main issues in question. Insightful, and thorough analysis of all the issues.

26.0 pts Above-Average (B) (23-26) Identifies and understands most of the main issues in question. Thorough analysis of most of the issues.

22.0 pts Average (C) (19-22) Identifies and understands some of the issues in question. Superficial analysis of some of the issues in question.

18.0 pts Near-Failing (D) (15-18) Identifies and understands few of the issues in question. Incomplete analysis of the issues.

14.0 pts Failing (F) (0-14) Identifies and understands very little of the issues in question. No analysis of the issues.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answers to Questions

30.0 pts Excellent (A) (27-30) Answers to questions are clear throughout. Connection with class and study material goes well beyond the obvious connections among ideas; demonstrates insight and original thinking.

26.0 pts Above-Average (B) (23-26) Answers to questions present some irrelevant information on topic etc., but very little; treatment goes beyond obvious connections with class and study material.

22.0 pts Average (C) (19-22) Answers to questions are vague in places; some irrelevant or distracting information.

18.0 pts Near-Failing (D) (15-18) Answers to questions are unclear and/or confusing. Treatment is very superficial; paper may be well written but says nothing.

14.0 pts Failing (F) (0-14) Does not address the questions. Treatment is very superficial and says very little.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Strategy Choice and Justification

25.0 pts Excellent (A) (21-25) An appropriate, reasonable strategy is selected and successfully developed. Content knowledge is used correctly.

20.0 pts Above-Average (B) (17-20) An appropriate, reasonable strategy is selected and moderately developed. Content knowledge used appropriately, with minor computation errors.

16.0 pts Average (C) (13-16) An appropriate, reasonable strategy is selected, but minimally developed. Uses content knowledge with conceptual errors.

12.0 pts Near-Failing (D) (10-12) There is an attempt to solve the problem. Barely any strategy is applied that could lead to an answer. Rarely uses content knowledge.

9.0 pts Failing (F) (0-9) There is no attempt to solve the problem. No strategy is applied that could lead to an answer. Uses no content knowledge.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communication, Style and Mechanics

15.0 pts Excellent (A) (13-15) Solution is presented in a clear and orderly manner so the reader can follow the flow of the solution and final answer.

12.0 pts Above-Average (B) (11-12) Solution is presented appropriately, but may contain a minor error. Reader can follow most of the steps in the solution and final answer.

10.0 pts Average (C) (9-10) Solution is presented appropriately, but contains conceptual errors. Solution is presented in an unclear manner. Scorer has difficulty following the sequence of steps.

8.0 pts Near-Failing (D) (7-8) Presents the problem in an unclear manner, steps are missing or out of sequence. Scorer cannot determine a sequence of steps.

6.0 pts Failing (F) (0-6) Does not present the problem in a manner that can be deciphered. Misuse of words throughout. Awkward sentences throughout. Difficult to attach a thought process. Poorly punctuated, misspelled words, grammatically abusive.

15.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services