Death To The Dead

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m studying for my Law class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

At 4:00 pm, Jughead arrives home after spending the afternoon with his mistress, Betty. He suddenly feels tired, and enters his study for a late afternoon nap, which is his habit. He lies down, and dies in his sleep. At precisely 4:30 pm, his wife Veronica sneaks into the study, believing he is asleep on the couch, and stabs him 22 times in the chest.

Evidence suggests that Veronica learned of Jughead’s affair just before entering the study. The autopsy confirms that Jughead’s death occurred at 4:10 pm as a result of poisoning. Subsequently, police obtained a written confession from Betty stating that she poisoned Jughead.

Write a formal essay recommending, if any, charges against Veronica. Support your answer using statutes, case law, and other external sources. Please double-space, use a 12-pt font and APA format. Answers must not exceed 500 words (not including cover page and bibliography–you do not have to draft an abstract).4.4 Reader Response for “What is an Author” by Foucault
I’m stuck on a English question and need an explanation.

There’s a lot going on in this essay. Look at the Attached document, and use it to address the following questions:
What distinctions does Foucault make between a person and an author? What are some of the compelling ideas, and what makes them speak to you?
When answering these, think about using full paragraphs, and quoting passages from the argument that comes to mind that help support your explanations.

The Reader Response will be graded by a simple rubric you can see here, and must be done by the time we review the piece in class. Consider how you might use the Reader Responses to advance your work on the papers we’re working on.Rhetorical Essay: nursing case study help
I’m studying for my English class and need an explanation.

Requirements:

3-4 pages in length MLA 8 Format MLA 8 Works Cited Page Direct quotes make sure you introduce, integrate, and analyze. Don’t simply “drop in” quotes. Because you are asked to write an analysis of an argument, you are required to evaluate whether or not Wong’s argument was effective or ineffective. Focus on walking your reader through the choices Wong makes and why she makes them in order to make her argument. Intro: strong hook, background context, introduce author & text, identify who the audience is, road map of your analysis, thesis (“In this paper, I will analyze and evaluate…”) Body: topic sentence; identify main claim; introduce evidence used, analyze and evaluate both the effectiveness of the claim & evidence
Repeat as necessary
Conclusion: So what? Bigger picture? Why should we care? Was Wong successful or persuasive? What should she add to be more persuasive?Discussion Question: nursing homework help
Need help with my Law question – I’m studying for my class.

Learning Object 1: Understand how identity is a combination of one sees oneself and how others perceive one.

Question1: Discuss the ways in which identity is shaped by both personal and social factors, with respect to racial and ethnic identity.

Learning Object2: Understand the four sociological perspectives on gender identity.

Question2: Compare and contrast the four sociological perspectives on identity and gender: essentialism, socialization, social construction, and structuralism.the giver book
I’m stuck on a Philosophy question and need an explanation.

Giver Paper (4 pages minimum, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, Times New Roman 12-point font)

Write an essay connecting class materials/discussion to Lois Lowry’s The Giver, reflecting on the questions in both A and B:

A. How does Jonas come to an understanding of himself? What role does memory play in this understanding?

B. Does Jonas make the right ethical decision in leaving his community? How does the relationship he has with his community play a role in his coming to that decision?

The essay should relate observations regarding these questions to content from the course texts and discussions. Be sure that the introduction of your paper includes your thesis about each question, and that the body of your paper presents logically constructed arguments to support your theses. Papers should include reference to events, characters, plot/subplots and themes in the novel relevant to your argument, but must not retell the story.

No outside research is required or expected on this assignment, but a close and thoughtful reading of the novel and its relationship to course topics is necessary. Use of any outside materials in your paper should nonetheless use proper citation. (See the Catalog statement on “Plagiarism” in “Class Policies” in syllabus.) Connecting class discussions and other readings will strengthen the essay and is essential for a B-level grade or above on this assignment (see assignment rubric below).

Rubric

PL 104 Giver Paper Rubric (1)

PL 104 Giver Paper Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompletion on time
10.0 pts

BASIC/PROFICIENT/EXCELLENT: 20 Completed on time.
6.0 pts

MINIMAL: 6-9 Not sufficiently completed and/or not completed on time.
0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT: 0-… Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics: clarity, grammar, attention to Style Sheet as appropriate etc.
10.0 pts

EXCELLENT: 9-10 Written with exceptional clarity and argumentation, persuasive style that describes well the observations about the book.
8.0 pts

PROFICIENT: 8 Organized, clear, and succinct. No grammar, syntax or spelling errors. Paper shows both distinctions and the relationships among its various parts/sections.
7.0 pts

BASIC: 7 Follows Style Sheet guidelines. Meets but does not exceed length requirement. Well organized. Generally free of grammar, syntax or spelling errors. Parts of paper are clearly delineated.
6.0 pts

MINIMAL: 6 Fails to follow Style Sheet guidelines. Disorganized, unclear, substantial grammar, syntax and spelling errors. Parts of paper not clearly delineated.
0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT: 0-… Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion A: Jonas’ self-understanding, and role of memory
40.0 pts

EXCELLENT: 37-40 Demonstrates thoughtful analysis and makes nuanced philosophical connections with course content.
35.0 pts

PROFICIENT: 34-36 Gives clear evidence of student’s having reflected on the question; clear connection with course content
32.0 pts

BASIC: 32-33 Gives some evidence of student’s having reflected on the question; minimal connection with course content.
28.0 pts

MINIMAL: 28-31 Lacks evidence of student’s having reflected on the question; no connection with course content.
0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT: 0-… Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion B: Jonas’ decision, and role of community
40.0 pts

EXCELLENT: 37-40 Demonstrates thoughtful analysis and makes nuanced philosophical connections with course content.
35.0 pts

PROFICIENT: 34-36 Gives clear evidence of student’s having reflected on the question; clear connection with course content
32.0 pts

BASIC: 32-33 Gives some evidence of student’s having reflected on the question; minimal connection with course content.
28.0 pts

MINIMAL: 28-31 Lacks evidence of student’s having reflected on the question; no connection with course content.
0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT: 0-… Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

40.0 pts

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services