Criminal Justice Classes

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Can you help me understand this Law question?

Explain how courts “balance” the rights of public sector employees against the needs of their employers. Provide examples.

What legal advice would you offer the CEO of a police department or corrections facility with regard to “the law” as it relates to making, changing, or enforcing departmental policy relating to employment conditions?

What is the Connick/Pickering test? Why is it important to criminal justice practitioners?

Which federal labor law should criminal justice managers be most concerned about? Least?

Which aspect of administrative/employment law was the most difficult to comprehend? Why?ECON314 week two. homework.: nursing assignment help services
I’m working on a Economics question and need guidance to help me study.

ECON314 week two. homework.ECON314 week two. homework.ECON314 week two. homework.Assignment #3: Inferential Statistics Analysis and Writeup
I need help with a Statistics question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

STAT200 Introduction to Statistics

Inferential Statistics Analysis and Writeup

Purpose:

The purpose of this assignment is to develop and carry out an inferential statistics analysis plan and write up the findings. There are two main parts to this assignment:

● Part A: Inferential Statistics Data Plan and Analysis

● Part B: Write up of Results

Part A: Prepare Data Plan, Analyze Data, and Complete Part A of the Assignment #3 Template

➢ Task 1: Select Variables. Review the variables you used for assignments #1 and #2. Select your qualitative socioeconomic variable as your grouping variable and the two expenditure variables from the variables used in these previous assignments. Fill in Table 1: Variables Selected for Analysis with name, description, and type of variable (i.e., qualitative or quantitative).

➢ Task 2: Select and Run a One Sample Confidence Interval Analysis. For one expenditure variable, select and run the appropriate method for estimating a parameter, based on a statistic (i.e., confidence interval method). Complete Table 2: Confidence Interval Information and Results, which follows the format outlined by Kozak and the course’s problem-solving approach, including:

○ Random variable stated in words

○ Confidence interval method, including rationale and assumptions

○ Method used for analyzing data (i.e., web applets, Excel, TI calculator, etc.).

○ Results obtained

○ Interpretation

➢ Task 3: Select Two Sample Hypothesis Test. Using the second expenditure variable (with the socioeconomic variable as the grouping variable), select and run the appropriate method for making decisions about two parameters relative to observed statistics (i.e., two sample

STAT200: Assignment #3 – Inferential Statistics Analysis and Writeup – Instructions

Page 2 of 5

hypothesis test method). Complete Table 3: Two Sample Hypothesis Test Analysis, which follows the format outlined by Kozak and the course’s problem-solving approach, including:

○ Hypotheses (null and alternative).

○ Two sample hypothesis testing method, including rationale and assumptions

○ Method used for analyzing data (i.e., web applets, Excel, TI calculator, etc.).

○ Results obtained.

○ Interpretation (i.e., Reject the null hypothesis OR Fail to reject null hypothesis)

Step 2: Write Up Results and Complete Part B of the Assignment #3 Template

For this 1 to 2 page section, refer to the inferential statistics data plan and computations done for Part A of this assignment. Address the following area:

➢ Introduction. Based on the scenario you submitted for the second assignment, provide a brief description of scenario, including the variables that were used in this analysis. Include a completed “Table 1: Variables Selected for Analysis to show the variables you selected for analysis.

➢ Data Set Description and Method Used for Analysis. Briefly describe the data set, using information provided with data set and write up in Assignment #2. Also describe what method(s) (i.e., free web applets, Excel, TI Calculator) you used to analyze the data.

➢ Results. In this section, you will report the results of your inferential statistics data analysis.

For the Confidence Interval Analysis, write one paragraph that includes:

o Statistical method used, including rationale and whether assumptions were met.

o Statistical Interpretation. The statistical interpretation is that the confidence interval has a probability (1−α, where α is the complement of the confidence level) of containing the population parameter.

o Real World Interpretation. Explain the results in everyday language. Recommend reviewing the text and information from the classroom for examples on how to report results in everyday language.

STAT200: Assignment #3 – Inferential Statistics Analysis and Writeup – Instructions

Page 3 of 5

For the Two Sample Hypothesis Test Analysis, write one paragraph that includes:

o Hypotheses that were assessed. See below table for example format:

Examples Format for Writing Null and Alternative Hypotheses, in Words

Null Hypothesis: There is no significant difference in [insert variable name] between [insert group 1 name] and [insert group 2 name] households.

Alternative Hypothesis:

➢ For two-tailed (≠): There is a significant difference in [insert variable name] between [insert group 1 name] and [insert group 2 name] households.

➢ For one-tailed (>): [Insert group 1 name] has statistically significantly higher [insert variable name] than [insert group 2 name].

➢ For one-tailed (<): [Insert group 1 name] has statistically significantly lower [insert variable name] than [insert group 2 name]. o Statistical method used, including rationale and whether assumptions were met. See below table for example format: Example Format for Writing Statistical Method with Rationale To determine whether the there was a difference in [insert household expenditure] between [insert names of two groups), a [insert name of hypothesis test used] was used. It was the appropriate statistical method, because [insert rationale]. The assumptions were assessed [insert information about the assumptions assessed and whether they were met]. o Conclusion from the Results. This is where you state whether to reject Ho or fail to reject Ho including the p-value that was obtained. The rule is: if the p-value < α, then reject Ho. If the p-value ≥α, then fail to reject Ho. STAT200: Assignment #3 – Inferential Statistics Analysis and Writeup – Instructions Page 4 of 5 o Real World Interpretation. Explain, in everyday language, the results. If any of the assumptions were not met, describe how it might affect conclusions. Address issues of Type I and/or Type II Error, where appropriate. Recommend reviewing the text and information from the classroom for examples on how to report results in everyday language. ➢ Discussion– Write one paragraph that summarizes the results of your findings and how they may be helpful to the person described in the scenario, when making a household budget.​FAMILY CULTURE ANALYSIS (Individual’s understanding of diversity and difference) I don’t know how to handle this Social Science question and need guidance. FAMILY CULTURE ANALYSIS This journal focuses on how family relationships and environments shape an individual’s understanding of diversity and difference. Students will interview one or two family members to explore one dimension of difference from the course content. For the purpose of this assignment, family can be broadly defined to include kin and extended kin relations, adopted family, care takers, as well as “found” family who have been instrumental in shaping your awareness of who you are and how you interpret the world. The journal is also meant to help students become more comfortable with the process of interviewing to obtain information about dimensions of difference. Pre-interview process: Select one dimension of difference that has been significantly shaped by familial interactions. For example: the assignment can focus on understanding race/culture/ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or even basic understanding of privilege and oppression, etc. Select one or two family members to interview from your family system and craft a series of interview questions (open ended, with prompts included) which are intended to explore the dimension of difference selected in relation to the family’s culture. Interview questions should be submitted as an attachment to the assignment (not counted in the 4-5 page limit). Journal prompts: Introduction – identify the dimension of difference selected; the family member(s) interviewed, noting the person’s relationship to you; and provide a rationale for both selections. Report – synthesize the interviewees responses to the questions crafted. For example: what are the interviewee’s perspectives, experiences, biases (both for and or against)? How has the interviewee’s perspective shaped your own thought? Please do not provide a transcript of the interview, but rather highlight themes or trends and discuss whether they were anticipated, in accord with class readings, etc. as appropriate. Reflection – consider how the values transmitted from this family member will influence your ability to work with clients whose values, beliefs, and experiences are discernably different from yours. Additionally, reflect on anything you learned about yourself and your cultural identity by talking to this individual(s). (FOCUS) Attach – attach the list of interview questions noting which were used and any that were extemporaneous (if applicable).This i9s for a rough draft for a research paper for ECON 211: nursing case study help I’m trying to study for my Economics course and I need some help to understand this question. Hi, The outline is already completed for this paper. The title of this paper is The Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 After you have written your outline, you will initiate work on the first draft of your paper. While the draft is not expected to include all of the points that you will have in your final paper, it must provide enough detail so that the general scope and depth of the final paper is clear. Your final paper must be at least 1,800 words and include six or more credible sources. Two of your sources must be from academic journals. Your first draft must include the following four sections: An introduction that introduces the selected topic and discusses how the analysis was conducted. A literature review that provides a detailed summary of the economic circumstances and facts that serve as the foundation of the economic analysis. A narrative body that includes: An economic analysis that uses the tools developed in the course along with your graphical depiction of the economics applied to your topic. Provide an explanation of the graphical analysis. Don’t leave it to the reader to figure out your intention. The specific analysis will depend on your chosen topic. Statistics that support your topic and narrative. Conclusion and a brief summary. Use current APA formatting for your paper including these elements: Title page Running head Page numbers Headings Source citations Reference list An abstract and table of contents are not required. Remember to use the Eaglet and APA resources provided on the Academic Resources page. Note: Your paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin. Turnitin is a service that checks your work for improper citation or potential plagiarism by comparing it against a database of web pages, student papers, and articles from academic books and publications. Ensure that your work is entirely your own and that you have not plagiarized any material! Your draft paper will not be stored in the Turnitin repository. You will submit your first draft in Module 6. Review the assignment rubric for detailed grading criteria. Here is the grading rubic: ECON 211 Module 6 Draft Research Paper Rubric ECON 211 Module 6 Draft Research Paper Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Focus – Application of Economic Theory 10.0 pts Paper makes great use applying economic theory to the topic (explaining the economics in the issue), includes economically logical conclusions, student excels at predicting future economic trends, events or conclusions based on the reasoning used. 8.0 pts Paper makes good use applying economic theory to the topic (explaining the economics in the issue), may include basic economically logical conclusions/projections. 5.0 pts Paper incorporates economic theory in explaining the topic (explaining the economics in the issue.) Little more than stating the economic theory is included. No use of economically logical conclusions. 3.0 pts Paper makes no application of economic theory to the topic. Is just descriptive of the topic in nature. Provides no evidence student connected economic theory to topic. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Inclusion of Course Learning Outcomes 10.0 pts Paper makes great use of course material, readings, and supplements. Easily maps to a number of learning outcomes in the syllabus. 8.0 pts Paper makes good use of course material and readings. Little outside supplements are included. Maps to a number of learning outcomes in the syllabus. 5.0 pts Paper makes basic use of course material. Typically no outside supplements or research in included. Difficult to map to a number of learning outcomes in the syllabus. 3.0 pts Paper makes no real constructive use of course material. One could consider this an opinion paper with no real supporting material. Difficult to map to a number of learning outcomes in the syllabus. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Inclusion of Supporting Data 10.0 pts Paper contains evidence of solid research effort drawing from many strong academic sources. 8.0 pts Paper contains evidence of medium research effort in number and strength of resources. 5.0 pts Paper contains evidence of minimal research effort or success drawing from few or weak sources (Wikipedia). 3.0 pts Paper contains evidence of no real research effort including no real source of research. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Use of Statistical Evidence 10.0 pts Paper makes exemplary use of credible statistical evidence. 8.0 pts Paper makes good use of credible statistical evidence. 5.0 pts Statistical evidence is partial, weak or inappropriate. 0.0 pts No statistical evidence is presented. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Strength of Argumentation 10.0 pts Thesis is well developed and supported, feeds conclusion. Contradictory views plausibly handled. 8.0 pts Thesis is adequately developed and supported, only partially supports the conclusion. Contradictory views not treated adequately. 5.0 pts Thesis is not adequately developed and logically supported, conclusion not supported. Contradictory views not treated. 3.0 pts Thesis is not developed or supported. Conclusion missing or not supported. Contradictory views not treated adequately. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome References 15.0 pts References are well documented in both the body and reference section in a consistent form. Many more than the minimum number of sources. 12.0 pts References are inconsistently documented in body and reference section. References are not ideally matched to content. Five sources and at least three journals contained. 8.0 pts References are poorly documented in body and reference section. References not appropriate to content or not current. Less than minimum requirements. 5.0 pts Almost no references documented. Inappropriate references. Fewer than five sources or fewer than three journal articles. Reliance on nonquality web sources. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar 10.0 pts Writing is grammatically correct, clear and flowing. 8.0 pts Writing should be polished for stronger presentation. 5.0 pts Writing needs work for clarity, organization and grammatical presentation. 2.0 pts Clear indication that this is a draft with serious need for review and editing. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Spelling 5.0 pts No spelling errors that distract the reader from the content. 4.0 pts Less than 1% of word total have errors in spelling that distract the reader from content. 2.0 pts Frequent (3-4%) spelling errors that distract the reader from content. 0.0 pts Significantly more than 4% spelling errors that distract the reader from the content. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Flow of Thesis and Arguments 10.0 pts Organization is logical and easy to follow. Includes introductory overview and supportable conclusion. 8.0 pts Organization is evident but could be strengthened. 5.0 pts Organization is weak. Introduction and conclusion are not clearly delineated in body of work. 3.0 pts Organization is almost nonexistent and represents just a free flow of ideas. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format 10.0 pts APA style is employed perfectly. 8.0 pts Few errors in APA style and most are inconsequential. 5.0 pts Many features of APA style are ignored. 0.0 pts APA style ignored completely. 10.0 pts Total Points: 100.0

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services