Case Study 3 Question (words Totall Should About Over 1 Page And More)

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m trying to learn for my Business class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Case Study 2
Misplaced Affections: Discharge for Sexual Harassment
Peter Lewiston was terminated on July 15, 2017, by the governing board of the Pine Circle Unified School District (PCUSD) for violation of the district’s sexual harassment policy. Prior to Lewiston’s termination he was a senior maintenance employee with an above-average work record who had worked for the PCUSD for 11 years. He had been a widower since 2012 and was described by his coworkers as a friendly, outgoing, but lonely individual. Beverly Gilbury was a fifth-grade teacher working in the district’s Advanced Learning Program. She was 28 years old and married and had worked for PCUSD for 6 years. At the time of the incidents, Lewiston and Gilbury both worked at the Simpson Elementary School, where their relationship was described as “cooperative.” The following sequence of events was reported separately by Lewiston and Gilbury during the district’s investigation of this sexual harassment case.

Gilbury reported that her relationship with Lewiston began to change during the last month of the 2016–2017 school year. She believed that Lewiston was paying her more attention and that his behavior was “out of the ordinary” and “sometimes weird.” He began spending more time in her classroom talking with the children and with her. At the time she did not say anything to Lewiston because “I didn’t want to hurt his feelings since he is a nice, lonely, older man.” However, on May 25, when Lewiston told Gilbury that he was “very fond” of her and that she had “very beautiful eyes,” she replied, “Remember, Peter, we’re just friends.” For the remainder of the school year, there was little contact between them; however, when they did see each other, Lewiston seemed “overly friendly” to her.

June 7, 2017. On the first day of summer school, Gilbury returned to school to find a dozen roses and a card from Lewiston. The card read, “Please forgive me for thinking you could like me. I played the big fool. Yours always, P.L.” Later in the day Lewiston asked Gilbury to lunch. She replied, “It’s been a long time since anyone sent me roses, but I can’t go to lunch. We need to remain just friends.” Gilbury told another teacher that she was uncomfortable about receiving the roses and card and that Lewiston would not leave her alone. She expressed concern that Lewiston might get “more romantic” with her.

June 8, 2017. Gilbury arrived at school to find another card from Lewiston. Inside was a handwritten note that read, “I hope you can someday return my affections for you. I need you so much.” Later in the day, Lewiston again asked her to lunch, and she declined, saying, “I’m a happily married woman.” At the close of the school day, when Gilbury went to her car, Lewiston suddenly appeared. He asked to explain himself but Gilbury became agitated and shouted, “I have to leave right now.” Lewiston reached inside the car, supposedly to pat her shoulder, but touched her head instead. She believed he meant to stroke her hair. He stated that he was only trying to calm her down. She drove away, very upset.

June 9, 2017. Gilbury received another card and a lengthy letter from Lewiston, stating that he was wrong in trying to develop a relationship with her and he hoped they could still remain friends. He wished her all happiness with her family and job.

June 11, 2017. Gilbury obtained from the Western Justice Court an injunction prohibiting sexual harassment by Lewiston. Shortly thereafter Lewiston appealed the injunction. A notice was mailed to Gilbury giving the dates of the appeal hearing. The notice stated in part, “If you fail to appear, the injunction may be vacated and the petition dismissed.” Gilbury failed to appear at the hearing, and the injunction was set aside. Additionally, on June 11 she had filed with the district’s EEOC officer a sexual harassment complaint against Lewiston. After the investigation, the district concluded that Lewiston’s actions created an “extremely sexually hostile” environment for Gilbury. The investigative report recommended dismissal based upon the grievous conduct of Lewiston and the initial injunction granted by the Justice Court.
Questions
Evaluate the conduct of Peter Lewiston against the EEOC’s definition of sexual harassment. Should the intent or motive behind Lewiston’s conduct be considered when deciding sexual harassment activities? Explain. If you were the district’s EEOC officer, what would you conclude? What disciplinary action, if any, would you take? You must provide an example of how the topic of the case relates to a “real world” experience you have had, or, if you have not had any relevant experience, providing an example from a recent current event.CRJ 151research paper using 2 sources: nursing essay help
I’m working on a Law question and need guidance to help me study.

You must research one theory relating to why people become involved in criminal activity. Explain this theory fully including the original theorist with the elements of it and explain why you chose this particular theory. Then, write a paper discussing the background, elements, impact and relevancy of this theory on society and predicating criminal behavior. and crimes. Finally, connect your findings to a real criminal event and explain how the theory you chose relates to the offender. The paper must be typed and have at least two sources with proper citations ( MLA Format with Citation Page). Papers MUST be typed and submitted in class (minimum of1000 words, Times New Roman, Font 12, and double spaced).In 500 words or more, discuss the risk and costs of compromised data integrity breaches. Focus on integrity not confidentiality. Look at military, education, science, medicine, finance, utilities, municipalities, etc.
I’m stuck on a Computer Science question and need an explanation.

Use at least three sources. Include at least 3 quotes from your sources enclosed in quotation marks and cited in-line by reference to your reference list. Example: “words you copied” (citation) These quotes should be one full sentence not altered or paraphrased. Cite your sources using APA format.

Copying without attribution or the use of spinbot or other word substitution software will result in a grade of 0.

Write in essay format not in bulleted, numbered or other list format.

Do not use attachments as a submission.

Reply to two classmates’ posting in a paragraph of at least five sentences by asking questions, reflecting on your own experience, challenging assumptions, pointing out something new you learned, offering suggestions. These peer responses are not ‘attaboys’. You should make your initial post by Thursday evening so your classmates have an opportunity to respond before Sunday.at midnight when all three posts are due.

It is important that you use your own words, that you cite your sources, that you comply with the instructions regarding length of your post and that you reply to two classmates in a substantive way (not ‘nice post’ or the like). Your goal is to help your colleagues write better. Do not use spinbot or other word replacement software. It usually results in nonsense and is not a good way to learn anything. . I will not spend a lot of my time trying to decipher nonsense. Proof read your work or have it edited. Find something interesting and/or relevant to your work to write about. Please do not submit attachments unless requested.

Required Readings
https://www.wombatsecurity.com/blog/scary-data-breach-statistics-of-2017

https://www.csoonline.com/article/2130877/data-breach/the-biggest-data-breaches-of-the-21st-century.html

https://www.army-technology.com/news/us-dod-suffers-massive-data-breach/

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/projects/biggest-healthcare-data-breaches-2018-so-far

Where Stolen Data Goes After Breach: An Experiment

https://www.computerweekly.com/opinion/Security-Think-Tank-Data-integrity-breaches-the-challenge-facing-banking

https://www.cimcor.com/blog/five-industries-in-greatest-danger-of-a-data-breach

Know the Odds: The Cost of a Data Breach in 2017

https://www.rapid7.com/db/modules/

Required Vidoes
Office of Personnel Management Breach Congressional Hearing

Launching Point for Women in Cyber Security – Unit 8200

Alexa, Health Data, and Medical Hacking

Red Tea,m Hacks Power Utility

Russian Hackers Breach US Utilities

Shadow Brokers Steal NSA Cyber ToolsASPA 3970 Final (MANGA & ANIME)
I don’t know how to handle this Social Science question and need guidance.

ASPA 3970 Final Project Prompt, Spring 2020

The Assignment

Topic: MANGA’S TRANSFORMATION INTO ANIME

Part 1

BEGIN BY WRITING A FORMAL PROPOSAL about the reason this topic was chosen! (Worth 5%)

Part 2

Rather than write a traditional research essay, you will develop an ArcGIS Story Maps project.

You will need to employ a mix of scholarly and non-scholarly sources – at least three of each and a total of eight sources overall (this may vary depending on your topic, the type and lengths of the sources, etc.). In addition to the text, I will ask that you include at least 6 images or other media on your site (this includes the title image or “cover”). Attention to detail will boost your final grade – such as: ensuring that all images or other media are captioned with explanatory information and proper attribution/citation, providing your project with a title that is both informative and interesting, manipulation of text to include hyperlinks, the careful choice of images of images and other media that will look good on the site (i.e. high-resolution), etc. Extensions can be granted if you ask well in advance but cannot go much beyond the deadline because grades are due soon afterwards.

Topic, Outline, and List of Sources

I would like you to upload a document to Brightspace explaining your topic, with an outline, list of sources, and ideally a preliminary thesis statement.

Grading Rubric

Essentials – 80%
Argument – Is the argument clear, logical, sustained, and convincing? Analysis – Does the analysis reflect an understanding of some of the major themes this semester? Does it go beyond surface appearances to find trends or explanations that a casual observer would miss? Evidence – Is evidence sufficient, from a variety of sources, and properly cited?
Bells & whistles – 20%
Readability – Does the text flow well between sentences and sections/paragraphs? Grammar – Are there a minimum of grammatical errors and typos? Pictures, videos, aesthetics – Does the presentation of your information catch the reader’s eye? Is it too busy or too simple? Is there a variety of media included in your webpage?
Quotations, Citations, and Works Cited

• Use quotation marks to identify quotes from any source, or use single-spaced indented blocks for quotes exceeding four lines of text.

• You must cite your sources. Any citation style is permitted so long as it is consistent. You may refer to the University of Wisconsin’s Writing Center website for citation styles: http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/Documentation.html.

• I take academic integrity very seriously; the university guidelines on academic honesty can be found at: https://academics.lmu.edu/honesty/Ethics Debate and Professional Discourse: assignment help philadelphia
Can you help me understand this Psychology question?

Ethics Debate and Professional Discourse
For professionals in psychology, it is important to critically evaluate ethical actions by gathering information and considering alternatives. It is important for psychology professionals to be able to present alternatives and respectfully agree, but also to respectfully disagree.

For this discussion, select one of the case studies from the Ethical Case Studies media. Summarize the case you selected in your own words. Supporting your thinking with specific ethical principles and standards, construct an initial post with a recommended clear course of action for the instructor in the case you selected.

TRANSCRIPT FOR THE CASE STUDY CHOSEN:

Introduction

Founded in 1990, the Institute for Global Ethics (IGE) is an independent, nonsectarian, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting ethical action in a global context. Their challenge is to explore the global common ground of values, elevate awareness of ethics, provide practical tools for making ethical decisions, and encourage moral actions based on those decisions. These two real-life ethical dilemmas from IGE come to you without resolutions. How you might resolve them? Select one of the case studies in this presentation. You will use your selection to complete this week’s discussion.
Cheating Yourself

As a professor of mathematics and computer science at a large regional university in the south, Al regularly teaches a remedial algebra course. The course typically enrolls students who have done very poorly in high-school math—a number of whom feel they were hopelessly incompetent in math and are frightened of failing yet again.

Al’s course, which has 90 students, has five exams during the semester. After grading the first one, he makes a mental note to pay close attention to a few students—this year including Sarah, a sophomore who does particularly badly on the exam. She confesses to him that she has never understood math at all but needs this course for her major. So Al is surprised to see that she is not in the room during the second exam. He does, however, think he sees a young man whom he hasn’t seen before. When the young man turns in his test paper, Al puts it aside to look at later. Sure enough, when he turns it over, it has Sarah’s name on it.

On this point, Al knows, the rules of the university are particularly clear: he could initiate action that will surely lead to the immediate and dishonorable dismissal of both Sarah and her friend. But he knows that such a dismissal would become a permanent part of their records. As such, it could forever warp their futures. To be sure, they did something terribly wrong. And certainly, given the well-known levels of cheating in the university system, the faculty has to send strong messages that such cheating will not be tolerated.

But do these two deserve to be singled out and academically destroyed? Is it fair to punish two individuals for the increased cheating statistics of their generation—especially when Sarah seems to have been driven into temptation through an almost helpless sense of fear? Al finds himself in a right-versus-right dilemma, with his strong sense of justice pitted against his powerful sense of mercy. So he calls them in to see him. The young man, it turns out, is Sarah’s boyfriend and a senior engineering major. Al lets them know the serious trouble they are in, and sends them away for a week while he considers what to do.
Lost in Translation?

Brian McNally is a part-time faculty member at a mid-sized university located in Boston, Massachusetts. He has worked for the University in his current capacity for less than five years, but is well versed in the university’s policies he has agreed to uphold.

In McNally’s survey course on American History, an international student turns in her first term paper. During the grading process, McNally discovers that the student’s work is a textbook case of plagiarism. The majority of the paper is copied directly and without attribution from the references listed at the back of the student’s paper, and little of the work is the student’s own.

The university has a strong policy about plagiarism, which is outlined in the course syllabus that McNally knows this student received. When confronted about plagiarizing her paper, she claims that she did not realize what she was doing was plagiarism, since the academic culture in her own country is very tolerant of such copying. McNally explains to her that the policy, as outlined, requires that he fail her, but that he would consider her explanation over the weekend.

In this justice-versus-mercy decision, McNally thinks that on one hand it is right to fail her and maybe even eject her from the class, because there would be no chance for her to pass the course after failing this assignment. He would be just in his decision because the rules were clear. On the other hand, it is right to show mercy and ask her to rewrite her paper. If she truly did not understand the rule, it would seem unfair to penalize her so harshly, especially if this was just a case of cultural mistranslation.

What should McNally do?

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services