Briefly summarize the method used. Was this an appropriate method given the rationale of the experiment?

Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

This is the article I am writing about: file:///C:/Users/18303/Downloads/Evaluating%20Research%20(1).pdf.
These are the instructions:
This article must include empirical research. This means that they must actually do an experiment, not just talk about the research of others. To identify an empirical article, look for a “methods” section. You must include the following in your summary. Please use these titles in your writeup.
I. Rationale: What was the investigators’ hypothesis? Why do you think they found this topic to be important?
II. Method: Briefly summarize the method used. Was this an appropriate method given the rationale of the experiment? Explain?
III. Results and Conclusion: Did their results support or refute their hypothesis?
IV. Evaluation: If you were the investigator, how would you have done the experiment differently? What were the strengths and weaknesses of the study?
V. How does this experiment fit into the historical research in social psychology? Explain what kinds of studies are precursors to this study, why this research is important today, and a possible next step in this line of research.
These are a few rules the professor has:
Don’t use direct quotations. I need to see that you can summarize and analyze the material yourself.
A summary does NOT involve you changing two or more words in the sentence. The entire sentence is written in your own words. Not using direct quotations does NOT mean writing the author’s sentence word for word and just leaving out quotation marks. Both of those still constitute plagiarism, which is taking credit for someone else’s work.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services